Skip to main content
Log in

Hard Copy Durable Patient Cancer Education Materials: Do They Still Matter?

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional hard copy information materials are still present in our cancer clinics. While their actual impact on patient care often goes un-assessed, it is important to understand their role in today’s electronic age where information can easily be obtained from various sources. It has remained the practice in our melanoma clinic to provide an information booklet to all of our new patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how useful this booklet was, as well as determine the current resources our patients use to gather cancer information. All patients referred to the clinic in the previous 3 years were pooled from our prospective, IRB-approved, melanoma sentinel node database. Of these 205 patients, a valid email address was listed for 147. A ten-question survey was emailed to all of these patients, who were not told ahead of time that their experience with the booklet would be studied. Seventy-seven of the 147 (52 %) patients polled responded. Fifty-eight (75 %) remembered receiving the booklet at their initial consultation. Forty-four (76 %) of those patients rated it as extremely or very useful, and no patients reported the booklet as not useful at all. Eighty-eight percent of respondents found the information to be clear and helpful. Sixty-four percent remembered the provider reviewing the material with them, and nearly all of these patients found that helpful. When asked to rank the importance of the various resources for obtaining cancer information, providers were ranked as most important, followed by the information booklet and Internet information sites. Internet blogs and friends and family were rated as the least important sources of information. Even in the current electronic age, our results indicate that information shared by providers, including the hard copy education booklet, was the most important source of information for our newly referred melanoma patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group (2014) United States Cancer Statistics: 1999 –2011 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Available at: www.cdc.gov/uscs Accessed 20 Aug 2015

  2. Marbach TJ, Griffie J (2011) Patient preferences concerning treatment plans, survivorship care plans, education, and support services. Oncol Nurs Forum 38(3):335–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chelf JH, Agre P, Axelrod A, Cheney L, Cole DD, Conrad K et al (2001) Cancer-related patient education: an overview of the last decade of evaluation and research. Oncol Nurs Forum 28(7):1139–1147

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sim JA, Shin JS, Park SM, Chang YJ, Shin A, Noh DY et al (2015) Association between information provision and decisional conflict in cancer patients. Ann Oncol 26(9):1974–1980

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McPherson CJ, Higginson IJ, Hearn J (2001) Effective methods of giving information in cancer: a systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials. J Public Health Med 23(3):227–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vetto JT, Dubois PM, Vetto I (1996) The impact of distribution of a patient—education pamphlet in a multidisciplinary breast clinic. J Cancer Educ 11(6):148–152

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stewart DE, Lickrish GM, Sierra S, Parkin H (1993) The effect of educational brochures on knowledge and emotional distress in women with abnormal Papanicolaou smears. Obstet Gynecol 81(2):280–282

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Friedman AJ, Cosby R, Boyko S et al (2011) Effective teaching strategies and methods of delivery for patient education: a systematic review and practice guideline recommendations. J Cancer Educ 26(1):12–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Beranova E, Sykes C (2007) A systematic review of computer-based softwares for educating patients with coronary heart disease. Patient Educ Couns 66(1):21–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bussey-Smith KL, Rossen RD (2007) A systematic review of randomized control trials evaluating the effectiveness of interactive computerized asthma patient education programs. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 98(6):507–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gysels M, Higginson IJ (2007) Interactive technologies and video- tapes for patient education in cancer care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Support Care Cancer 15(1):7–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. File T, Ryan C (2014) “Computer and Internet Use in the United States: 2013” American Community Survey Reports, ACS-28, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.census.gov/history/pdf/2013computeruse.pdf. Accessed 22 August 2015

  13. Fox S, Duggan M. Health Online 2013, Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, August 7-September 6, 2012 Survey. Available from: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Health-online.aspx. Accessed 22 August 2015

  14. Stewart MA (1995) Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ 152(9):1423–1433

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Weiss BD (2003) Health literacy: a manual for clinicians. American Medical Association, American Medical Foundation, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  16. Badarudeen S, Sabharwal S (2010) Assessing readability of patient education materials: current role in orthopaedics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(10):2572–2580

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. National Institute of Health. How to Write Easy to Read Health Materials. National Library of Medicine Website. Available at: https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/etr.html. Accessed Aug. 28th 2015

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John T. Vetto.

Additional information

Winner, R. Davilene Carter Presidential Prize for Best Manuscript, Third Place, 2015 International Cancer Education Conference, Tucson, AZ, October 21–24, 2015

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schuitevoerder, D., Fortino, J. & Vetto, J.T. Hard Copy Durable Patient Cancer Education Materials: Do They Still Matter?. J Canc Educ 32, 487–490 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-0987-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-0987-4

Keywords

Navigation