Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Cancer, Educate to Prevent Model—the Potential of School Environment for Primary Prevention of Cancer

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 29 January 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

Cancer represents one of the main causes of death worldwide; consequently, preventive interventions are of utmost importance in public health education. The leading model of cancer prevention campaigns is based on general and undifferentiated actions mediated by health professionals, focusing on the technical and scientific information but rather ineffective in changing the symbolic, cognitive and practical relationship with the disease. New intervention models are thus required to address cancer literacy, being early interventions targeted to specific groups an elective counterpoint to contribute to positive and durable changes in cancer prevention. Our aim is to evaluate the feasibility and impact of cancer prevention programmes planned as focused interventions in restricted targets and mediated by non-healthcare professionals to increase cancer literacy and promote preventive behaviours. This pilot study evaluates schools’ potential as a vehicle for cancer prevention education in a reality shaped by traditional health prevention campaigns. We developed a protocol of systematic surveying in order to review and, in the future, optimize and replicate this ecological model of intervention to other groups and contexts. The implementation of this model has been successful in which concerns to the effectiveness of the training programme for teachers. This led to the development of impactful cancer prevention education projects by trainees targeted to their students, allowing us to argue that it contributes to knowledge and practice in this complex as consensual priority area of intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 29 January 2018

    The affiliation address of Dr. Helena Santos should be Faculty of Economics, University of Porto, Portugal and Dr. Luís Moreira’s should be Research Unit in Education and Community Intervention – RECI & Health School of Vila Nova de Gaia – Piaget Institute.

References

  1. Bray F, Jemal A, Grey N, Ferlay J, Forman D (2012) Global cancer transitions according to the Human Development Index 2008–2030: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 13(8):790–801. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70211-5.2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61(2):69–90. doi:10.3322/caac.20107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Colditz GA, Wei EK (2012) Preventability of cancer: the relative contributions of biologic and social and physical environmental determinants of cancer mortality. Annu Rev Public Health 33(1):137–156, 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031811-124627

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Green L, Kreuter M (2005) Health program planning: an educational and ecological approach, vol 1–2. McGraw-Hill Education, McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berger PL (1971) The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge / by Peter L. Berger and Thomas Luckmann. Penguin University Books, vol. Accessed from http://nla.gov.au/nla.cat-vn2167125. Harmondsworth: Penguin

  6. Mason M (2000) Teachers as critical mediators of knowledge. J Philos Educ 34(2):343–342. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.00177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp Educ Psychol 25(1):54–67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stiller CA (2007) International patterns of cancer incidence in adolescents. Cancer Treat Rev 33(7):631–645. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2007.01.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sener SF, Grey N (2005) The global burden of cancer. J Surg Oncol 92(1):1–3. doi:10.1002/jso.20335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang S, Collie CL (2009) The future of cancer prevention: will our workforce be ready? Cancer Epidemiol, Biomark Prevent : Public Am Assoc Cancer Res, Cospons Am Soc Prevent Oncol 18(9):2348–2351. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gouveia J, Coleman MP, Haward R, Zanetti R, Hakama M, Borras JM, Primic-Žakelj M, de Koning HJ, Travado L (2008) Improving cancer control in the European Union: conclusions from the Lisbon round-table under the Portuguese EU Presidency, 2007. Eur J Cancer 44(10):1457–1462. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.02.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Colditz GA, Wei EK (2012) Preventability of cancer: the relative contributions of biologic and social and physical environmental determinants of cancer mortality. Annu Rev Public Health 33(1):137–156. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031811-124627

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kyle RG, Nicoll A, Forbat L, Hubbard G (2013) Adolescents’ awareness of cancer risk factors and associations with health-related behaviours. Health Educ Res. doi:10.1093/her/cyt055

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Parsons T., E.A. Shils and N.J. Smelser (1965) Toward a general theory of action: Theoretical Foundations for the Social Sciences. Harper & Row

  15. Schiavo R. (2007) Health communication: from theory to practice. Wiley

  16. Cheng D, Claessens M, Gascoigne T, Metcalfe J, Schiele B, Shi S (2008) Communicating science in social contexts: new models, new practices. Springer Science + Business Media B.V, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Issel M. (2009) Health program planning and evaluation: a practical, systematic approach for community health. Jones & Bartlett Learning

  18. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (2005) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bryman A (2012) Social research methods. OUP Oxford, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ghiglione R, Matalon B (1978) Les enquÍtes sociologiques : thÈories et pratique. Colin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to all the teachers that voluntarily participated in the training programme and to the schools and their students that participated in the study. This study was supported by Portuguese High Commissioner for Health—grant ref# 010–98. The funder had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Santos-Silva.

Additional information

A correction to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-018-1327-7.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 61 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barros, A., Santos, H., Moreira, L. et al. The Cancer, Educate to Prevent Model—the Potential of School Environment for Primary Prevention of Cancer. J Canc Educ 31, 646–651 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0892-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0892-2

Keywords

Navigation