Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development and Evaluation of the Curriculum for BOLD (Bronx Oncology Living Daily) Healthy Living: a Diabetes Prevention and Control Program for Underserved Cancer Survivors

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Underserved minority communities have few resources for addressing comorbidity risk reduction among long-term cancer survivors. To address this community need, we developed and piloted the Bronx Oncology Living Daily (BOLD) Healthy Living program, the first known diabetes prevention and control program to target cancer survivors and co-survivors in Bronx County, NY. The program aimed to facilitate lifestyle change and improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) through weekly group nutrition education (60–90 min) and exercise (60 min) classes. We examined baseline characteristics of participants using simple descriptive statistics and evaluated program implementation and impact using the Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. The curriculum, which drew from the social-ecological framework and motivational and cognitive behavioral strategies, consisted of 12 culturally and medically tailored modules with options for implementation as a 12- or 4-week program. Seven programs (four 12 weeks and three 4 weeks in length, respectively) were implemented at five community site locations. Sixty-six cancer survivors and 17 cancer co-survivors (mean age 60.5 ± 10.2 years) enrolled in one of the programs. Most participants were female (95.2 %) minority (55.4 % black, 26.5 % Hispanic/Latino) breast cancer survivors (75.7 %). Median program attendance was 62.5 % and did not significantly differ by program length; however, 67.3 % of participants achieved ≥60 % attendance among the 12-week programs, compared to 41.9 % among the 4-week programs, and this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.02). Overall, participants reported significant pre/post improvements in perceived health as good/excellent (66.0 to 75.5 %; p = 0.001) and borderline significant decreases in perceived pain as moderate/severe (45.5 to 38.2 %; p = 0.05). More than 90 % of participants reported that the program helped them to achieve their short-term goals, motivated them to engage in healthier behaviors, and felt that the nutrition and exercise classes were relevant to their needs. These results indicate that a short-term lifestyle intervention program for adult cancer survivors was acceptable in our community and motivated cancer survivors to improve their HRQoL. The curriculum can be used as a tool to facilitate development of similar programs in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society (2012) Cancer treatment & survivorship facts & figures 2012–2013. American Cancer Society, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  2. Smits A, Lopes A, Das N, Bekkers R, Galaal K (2014) The impact of BMI on quality of life in obese endometrial cancer survivors: does size matter? Gynecol Oncol 132(1):137–141. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.11.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Irwin MR, Olmstead RE, Ganz PA, Haque R (2013) Sleep disturbance, inflammation and depression risk in cancer survivors. Brain Behav Immun 30(Suppl):S58–S67. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2012.05.002

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vissers PA, Thong MS, Pouwer F, Zanders MM, Coebergh JW, Van De Poll-Franse LV (2013) The impact of comorbidity on health-related quality of life among cancer survivors: analyses of data from the PROFILES registry. J Cancer Surviv 7(4):602–613. doi:10.1007/s11764-013-0299-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tammemagi CM, Nerenz D, Neslund-Dudas C, Feldkamp C, Nathanson D (2005) Comorbidity and survival disparities among black and white patients with breast cancer. JAMA 294(14):1765–1772. doi:10.1001/jama.294.14.1765

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stava CJ, Beck ML, Feng L, Lopez A, Busaidy N, Vassilopoulou-Sellin R (2007) Diabetes mellitus among cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 1(2):108–115. doi:10.1007/s11764-007-0016-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moadel AB, Morgan C, Dutcher J (2007) Psychosocial needs assessment among an underserved, ethnically diverse cancer patient population. Cancer 109(2 Suppl):446–454. doi:10.1002/cncr.22357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Byers TE, Wolf HJ, Bauer KR, Bolick-Aldrich S, Chen VW, Finch JL, Fulton JP et al (2008) The impact of socioeconomic status on survival after cancer in the United States: findings from the National Program of Cancer Registries Patterns of Care Study. Cancer 113(3):582–591. doi:10.1002/cncr.23567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. United States Census Bureau. State & county quick facts: Bronx County (Bronx Borough), New York. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/36/36005.html. Accessed 30 May 2014

  10. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Shortage designation: health professional shortage areas & medically underserved areas/populations. Available at URL: http://www.hrsa.gov/shortage/. Accessed 12 Jun 2014

  11. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. New York City: Community Health Survey Atlas. Available at URL: http://home2.nyc.gov/html/doh/downloads/pdf/epi/nyc_comhealth_atlas10.pdf. Accessed 18 Mar 2013

  12. Gutierrez J, Devia C, Weiss L, Chantarat T, Ruddock C, Linnell J, Golub M, Godfrey L, Rosen R, Calman N (2014) Health, community, and spirituality: evaluation of a multicultural faith-based diabetes prevention program. Diabetes Educ 40(2):214–222. doi:10.1177/0145721714521872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Demark-Wahnefried W, Aziz NM, Rowland JH, Pinto BM (2005) Riding the crest of the teachable moment: promoting long-term health after the diagnosis of cancer. J Clin Oncol 23(24):5814–5830

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM (1999) Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health 89(9):1322–1327

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA, Estabrooks PA, Vogt TM (2006) Evaluating the impact of health promotion programs: using the RE-AIM framework to form summary measures for decision making involving complex issues. Health Educ Res 21(5):688–694. doi:10.1093/her/cyl081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bronx Health Reach. Bronx Health REACH Website. Available at URL: http://www.bronxhealthreach.org/. Accessed 13 Jun 2014

  17. Komen SG. Friends & familiy: co-survivor. Available at URL: http://ww5.komen.org/BreastCancer/FriendsampFamily.html. Accessed 11 Jun 2014

  18. Given BA, Sherwood P, Given CW (2011) Support for caregivers of cancer patients: transition after active treatment. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 20(10):2015–2021. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-11-0611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Calhoun JG, Rowney R, Eng E, Hoffman Y (2005) Competency mapping and analysis for public health preparedness training initiatives. Public Health Rep 120(Suppl 1):91–99

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Evert AB, Boucher JL, Cypress M, Dunbar SA, Franz MJ, Mayer-Davis EJ, Neumiller JJ et al (2014) Nutrition therapy recommendations for the management of adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care 37(Suppl 1):S120–S143. doi:10.2337/dc14-S120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bantle JP, Wylie-Rosett J, Albright AL, Apovian CM, Clark NG, Franz MJ, Hoogwerf BJ et al (2008) Nutrition recommendations and interventions for diabetes: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 31(Suppl 1):S61–S78. doi:10.2337/dc08-S061

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kushi LH, Byers T, Doyle C, Bandera EV, Mccullough M, Mctiernan A, Gansler T, Andrews KS, Thun MJ (2006) American Cancer Society Guidelines on Nutrition and Physical Activity for cancer prevention: reducing the risk of cancer with healthy food choices and physical activity. CA Cancer J Clin 56(5):254–281, quiz 313–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wiseman M (2008) The second World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research expert report. Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. Proc Nutr Soc 67(3):253–256. doi:10.1017/s002966510800712x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kerr J, Rosenberg DE, Nathan A, Millstein RA, Carlson JA, Crist K, Wasilenko K et al (2012) Applying the ecological model of behavior change to a physical activity trial in retirement communities: description of the study protocol. Contemp Clin Trials 33(6):1180–1188. doi:10.1016/j.cct.2012.08.005

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Choose MyPlate. Available at URL: http://www.choosemyplate.gov/. Accessed 11 Jul 2014

  26. The New York City Department of Mental Health and Hygiene. Diabetes provider action kit. http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/html/living/diabetes-provider-kit.shtml. Accessed 11 Jul 2014

  27. (1998) Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: executive summary. Expert Panel on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight in Adults. Am J Clin Nutr 68(4):899–917

  28. Gerhard T (2008) Bias: considerations for research practice. Am J Health Syst Pharm 65(22):2159–2168. doi:10.2146/ajhp070369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kelley K, Clark B, Brown V, Sitzia J (2003) Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int J Qual Health Care 15(3):261–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Moody K, Mannix MM, Furnari N, Fischer J, Kim M, Moadel A (2011) Psychosocial needs of ethnic minority, inner-city, pediatric cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 19(9):1403–1410. doi:10.1007/s00520-010-0966-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Courneya KS, Friedenreich CM, Quinney HA, Fields AL, Jones LW, Fairey AS (2004) Predictors of adherence and contamination in a randomized trial of exercise in colorectal cancer survivors. Psychooncology 13(12):857–866. doi:10.1002/pon.802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Moadel AB, Shah C, Wylie-Rosett J, Harris MS, Patel SR, Hall CB, Sparano JA (2007) Randomized controlled trial of yoga among a multiethnic sample of breast cancer patients: effects on quality of life. J Clin Oncol 25(28):4387–4395. doi:10.1200/jco.2006.06.6027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Klosky JL, Cash DK, Buscemi J, Lensing S, Garces-Webb DM, Zhao W, Wiard S, Hudson MM (2008) Factors influencing long-term follow-up clinic attendance among survivors of childhood cancer. J Cancer Surviv 2(4):225–232. doi:10.1007/s11764-008-0063-0

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gordon C, Purciel-Hill M, Ghai NR, Kaufman L, Graham R, Van Wye G (2011) Measuring food deserts in New York City’s low-income neighborhoods. Health Place 17(2):696–700. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.12.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hosler AS, Rajulu DT, Fredrick BL, Ronsani AE (2008) Assessing retail fruit and vegetable availability in urban and rural underserved communities. Prev Chronic Dis 5(4):A123

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Risendal B, Dwyer A, Seidel R, Lorig K, Katzenmeyer C, Coombs L, Kellar-Guenther Y, Warren L, Franco A, Ory M (2014) Adaptation of the chronic disease self-management program for cancer survivors: feasibility, acceptability, and lessons for implementation. J Cancer Educ. doi:10.1007/s13187-014-0652-8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (2001) Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58,209 women with breast cancer and 101,986 women without the disease. Lancet 358(9291):1389–1399. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06524-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Colditz GA, Kaphingst KA, Hankinson SE, Rosner B (2012) Family history and risk of breast cancer: nurses’ health study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 133(3):1097–1104. doi:10.1007/s10549-012-1985-9

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The BOLD program and all of its facets were initiated and developed at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine’s Cancer Center. The BOLD Healthy Living program was funded by Mount Sinai School of Medicine’s Communities IMPACT Diabetes Center Legacy Grant, the Entertainment Industry Foundation’s Revlon Run/Walk, and the New Yankee Stadium Community Benefits Fund, Inc. In addition, this publication was supported in part by the Diabetes Research and Training Center Grant P60 DK020541, CTSA Grant UL1 TR001073, TL1 TR001072, and KL2 TR001071 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Additional support was provided by the Commission on Dietetic Registration Doctoral Scholarship of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.

Conflict of Interest

The authors do not have any potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beth A. Conlon.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Table 1

(DOCX 36 kb)

Supplementary Table 2

(DOCX 34 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Conlon, B.A., Kahan, M., Martinez, M. et al. Development and Evaluation of the Curriculum for BOLD (Bronx Oncology Living Daily) Healthy Living: a Diabetes Prevention and Control Program for Underserved Cancer Survivors. J Canc Educ 30, 535–545 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0750-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0750-7

Keywords

Navigation