Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reaching Hard to Reach Populations with Hard to Communicate Messages: Efficacy of a Breast Health Research Champion Training Program

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A Breast Health Research Champion training program was a developed targeting self-identified community breast health advocates from a predominant African-American community with a significant breast cancer mortality disparity. Twelve individuals completed the program that provided training in breast cancer risk and screening, breast cancer research, biospecimen in cancer research, and human research subject protection. The training emphasized four key messages to be disseminated to the community. Trainees hosted a minimum of two social chats with individuals from their social networks and functioned as community researchers, acquiring consent and gathering follow-up data from attendees. Trainees reached 199 individuals from their social networks, and chats were diverse in the venue selected, mode of message transmission, and the audience reached. Post/pre questionnaire data from attendees at the chats showed significant improvement in knowledge, attitudes, and intended behaviors as it relates to breast cancer screening, clinical research, and biospecimen in research. Forty percent of attendees provided 4-week follow-up information. Of respondents eligible for mammography, 38 % had taken action to be screened, and 86 % of respondents had spoken about the information to someone else in their social network. Trainees expressed feelings of empowerment after completing the project, “feeling like the expert,” and all trainees were surprised at the enthusiastic response from attendees of their chats. Trainees continued to disseminate the information learned from the training program during the 6 months following the training, reaching an additional 786 individuals in the community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brawley OW (2004) The study of accrual to clinical trials: can we learn from studying who enters our studies? J Clin Oncol 22(11):2039–2040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ford JG, Howerton M (2004) The science of recruiting minority populations to screening trials. Clin Trials 1(4):341–2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lai GY, Gary TL, Tilburt J, Bolen S, Baffi C, Wilson RF et al (2006) Effectiveness of strategies to recruit underrepresented populations into cancer clinical trials. Clin Trials 3(2):133–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. American Cancer Society (2014) Cancer facts & figures 2014. American Cancer Society, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pinsky PF, Ford M, Gamito E, Higgins D, Jenkins V, Lamerato L et al (2008) Enrollment of racial and ethnic minorities in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer screening trial. J Natl Med Assoc 100(3):291–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Joseph G, Dohan D (2009) Diversity of participants in clinical trials in an academic medical center: the role of the “Good Study Patient?”. Cancer 115(3):608–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Langford A, Resnicow K, An L (2010) Clinical trial awareness among racial/ethnic minorities in HINTS 2007: sociodemographic, attitudinal, and knowledge correlates. J Health Commun 15(3):92–101

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Williams MM, Scharff DP, Mathews KJ, Hoffsuemmer JS, Jackson P, Morris JC, Edwards DF (2010) Barriers and facilitators of African American participation in Alzheimer disease biomarker research. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 24(Suppl):S24–S29

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. George S, Duran N, Norris K (2014) A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders. Am J Public Health 104(2):16–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Scharff DP, Mathews KJ, Jackson P, Hoffsuemmer J, Martin E, Edwards D (2010) More than Tuskegee: understanding mistrust about research participation. J Health Care Poor U 21(3):879–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gibson LM (2000) A four-phase program to recruit African American women into breast cancer promotion programs. ABNF J 11(4):94–96

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cuaresma C, Mitschke D, Robinett H (2007) Capacity building for cancer awareness in Hawai‘i’s foreign-born Filipino communities. Pac Health Dialog 14(1):128–34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Robertson EM, Franklin AW, Flores AM, Wherry S, Buford J (2006) African American community breast health education: a pilot project. ABNF J 17(1):48–51

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mitschke DB, Cassel K, Higuchi P (2007) Empowering natural clinical trial advocates: nurses and outreach workers. Pac Health Dialog 14(1):135–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ford M, Wahlquist A, Blake R, Green C, Streets J, Fuller E, Johnson E et al (2012) Assessing an intervention to improve clinical trial perceptions among predominately African-American communities in South Carolina. Prog Community Health Partnersh 6(3):249–263

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Virginia Department of Health, http://www.vdh.virginia.gov/ofhs/prevention/cpc/documents/2013/pdf/VA_CCC_2012_Annual_Report%20062912.pdf, accessed on 1/12/2014

  17. Virginia Department of Health. http://www.vdh.virginia.gov/healthstats/stats.htm, Cancer deaths 2003 – 2007, accessed on 7/19/2011

  18. Mosavel M, Rafie C, Cadet DL, Ayers A (2012) Opportunities to reduce cancer barriers: community town halls and provider focus groups. J Cancer Educ 27(4):641–8

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. NCI (Producer) (2007). Understanding cancer clinical trials [DVD]. United States: Producer

  20. Lemke AA, Halverson C, Ross LF (2012) Biobank participation and returning research results: perspectives from a deliberative engagement in South side Chicago. Am J Med Genet A 158:1029–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rockwell SK, Kohn H (1989). Post-then-pre evaluation. J Extension; 27 (2)

  22. Ainsworth BE, Wilcox S, Thompson WW (2003) Personal, social, and physical environmental correlates of physical activity in African-American women in South Carolina. Am J Prev Med 25(3 Suppl 1):23–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Christakis NA, Fowler JH (2008) The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. N Engl J Med 358(21):2249–58

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Strully KW, Fowler JH, Murabito JM (2012) Aspirin use and cardiovascular events in social networks. Soc Sci Med 74(7):1125–9

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Barnes J (1954) Class and committees in a Norwegian island Parish. Hum Relat 7:39–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the National Cancer Institute Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities for funding this project through a supplement to the Virginia Commonwealth University Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program (U10CA052784 & U10CA052784-20S2).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlin Rafie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rafie, C., Ayers, A., Cadet, D. et al. Reaching Hard to Reach Populations with Hard to Communicate Messages: Efficacy of a Breast Health Research Champion Training Program. J Canc Educ 30, 599–606 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0720-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0720-0

Keywords

Navigation