Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical Presentation and Outcomes Associated with Different Treatment Modalities for Pediatric Bark Scorpion Envenomation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Scorpion envenomation is potentially life-threatening and affects children in the Southwestern USA. An FDA-approved antivenom is available, but its high cost has led to use of off-label antivenom dosing or supportive care alone as alternatives to FDA-recommended dosing. This study sought to determine whether treatment approach influences outcomes in envenomated children.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of children with grade III or IV scorpion envenomation evaluated in Phoenix Children’s Hospital ED between September 1, 2011, and March 31, 2014. Patients were grouped based on treatment: group 1, supportive care only; group 2, FDA-recommended dosing (3-vial initial dose); group 3, “off label” dosing (1–2 vial initial dose). Primary outcomes were ED length of stay and hospital admission. Secondary outcomes were mechanical ventilation and aspiration pneumonia.

Results

One hundred fifty-six patients were included with 58 patients in group 1, 16 patients in group 2, and 82 patients in group 3. Group 1 was significantly older than the antivenom groups (p < 0.001), and group 2 was younger than group 3 (p = 0.024). Envenomation grade was also different, with group 1 having fewer grade IV then groups 2 and 3 (p < 0.001). Three percent of group 1, 56 % of group 2, and 28 % of group 3 had respiratory distress (p < 0.001). ED LOS was not significantly different between groups. Hospital admission occurred in 3.4 % group 1, no group 2, and 8.5 % group 3 patients. Two intubations and two aspirations occurred in group 3.

Conclusions

In this study, clinical presentation appeared to influence treatment. Groups that received antivenom had a higher envenomation grade than the group that received supportive care. The FDA-recommended dosing group was younger and had more respiratory distress than those treated with initial doses of 1–2 vials. Outcomes were not significantly different between groups. Prospective studies may identify the ideal population for each treatment approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. LoVecchio F, McBride C. Scorpion envenomations in young children in Central Arizona. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2003;41(7):937–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Curry SC, Vance MV, Ryan PJ, Kunkel DB, Northey WT. Envenomation by the scorpion Centruroides sculpturatus. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1983-1984;21(4–5):417–49.

  3. Skolnik AB, Ewald MB. Pediatric scorpion envenomation in the United States: morbidity, mortality, and therapeutic innovations. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013;29(1):98–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. US Food and Drug Administration: Anascorp® package insert. Available at http://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/BloodBloodProducts/ApprovedProducts/LicensedProductsBLAs/FractionatedPlasmaProducts/UCM266725.pdf

  5. Boyer LV, Theodorou AA, Berg RA, Mallie J. Antivenom for critically ill children with neurotoxicity from scorpion stings. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2090–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Boyer L, Degan J, Ruha AM, et al. Safety of intravenous equine F(ab’)2: insights following clinical trials involving 1534 recipients of scorpion antivenom. Toxicon. 2013;76:386–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. O’Connor A, Ruha AM. Clinical course of bark scorpion envenomation managed without antivenom. J Med Toxicol. 2012;8(3):258–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gibly R, Williams M, Walter FG, McNally J, Conroy C, Berg RA. Continuous intravenous midazolam infusion for Centruroides exilicauda scorpion envenomation. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;34(5):620–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Armstrong EP, Bakall M, Skrepnek GH, Boyer LV. Is scorpion antivenom cost-effective as marketed in the United States? Toxicon. 2013;76:394–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bond GR. Antivenin administration for Centruroides scorpion sting: risks and benefits. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21(7):788–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Riley BD, LoVecchio F, Pizon AF. Lack of scorpion antivenom leads to increased pediatric ICU admissions. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;47(4):398–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne-Michelle Ruha.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

None of the authors have any conflicting financial relationships to declare.

Sources of Funding

There was no funding provided for this study.

Additional information

This study was presented as a platform at the American College of Medical Toxicology Annual Scientific Meeting in Clearwater, Florida, in March of 2015.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Coorg, V., Levitan, R.D., Gerkin, R.D. et al. Clinical Presentation and Outcomes Associated with Different Treatment Modalities for Pediatric Bark Scorpion Envenomation. J. Med. Toxicol. 13, 66–70 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-016-0575-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-016-0575-3

Keywords

Navigation