Severe Drug-induced Liver Injury Associated with Prolonged Use of Linezolid
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- De Bus, L., Depuydt, P., Libbrecht, L. et al. J. Med. Toxicol. (2010) 6: 322. doi:10.1007/s13181-010-0047-0
- 491 Views
This study aims to describe a patient developing concomitant severe liver failure and lactic acidosis after long-term treatment with linezolid. A 55-year-old Caucasian woman developed concomitant severe liver failure and lactic acidosis after a treatment with linezolid for 50 days because of infected hip prosthesis. Other causes of liver failure and lactic acidosis were excluded by extensive diagnostic workup. A liver biopsy showed microvesicular steatosis. As linezolid toxicity was considered to be the cause of the lactic acidosis and the severe hepatic failure, the antibiotic was withdrawn. After 4 days of supportive therapy and hemodialysis, the serum lactate level returned within normal limits. The prothrombin time ratio and thrombocytes recovered within 2 weeks. Bilirubin levels normalized within 14 weeks. Since no other cause could be identified, liver injury was considered to be drug-related. Resolution of the hepatotoxicity occurred after discontinuation of linezolid, supportive treatment measures, and hemodialysis. Both lactic acidosis and microvesicular steatosis after the use of linezolid are related to mitochondrial dysfunction. The Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences/Roussel Ucalf Causality Assessment Method scale revealed that the adverse drug event was probable. Prolonged exposure to linezolid may induce severe hepatotoxicity. Clinicians should be aware of this possible adverse effect especially in case of long-term treatment.
KeywordsLinezolidLiver failureMicrovesicular steatosisLactic acidosis
Infection of prosthetic devices is frequently caused by Gram-positive pathogens and requires prolonged antibiotic treatment in order to achieve microbial eradication. When methicillin-resistant staphylococci are involved, linezolid is a recommendable therapeutic option as it shows excellent activity against these pathogens and as it has a 100% oral bioavailability . As such, it can be administered orally and on an outpatient basis, whereas treatment with glycopeptides requires intravenous access, which often implies prolonged hospitalization.
Serious side effects of linezolid therapy have been described, including bone marrow toxicity, peripheral and optic neuropathy, and lactic acidosis [2–4]. Lactic acidosis has been reported almost exclusively in patients treated for longer than the maximum recommended duration of 28 days. In this report, we describe a case of severe drug-induced liver injury (DILI) related to the use of linezolid.
Time course of laboratory test results parameter (reference range)
ALT (7–31 U/l)
AST (0–31 U/l)
ALP (30–120 U/l)
GGT (9–36 U/l)
TotBili (0.3–1.2 mg/dl)
Lactate (9–16 mg/dl)
D − 64
D − 42
D − 34
D − 6
D + 34
D + 50
D + 54
D + 104
After 5 weeks on glycopeptides, she developed renal toxicity (on vancomycin) and thrombocytopenia (on teicoplanin), so these were discontinued and linezolid (600 mg every 12 h) was initiated. Liver function tests at the start of linezolid (day 0) are detailed in Table 1. Meropenem (1 g every 8 h) was added for coverage of Gram-negative pathogens. With this antibiotic regimen, the patient improved clinically, and inflammatory parameters decreased gradually, but symptoms of anorexia and weight loss persisted, necessitating placement on parenteral nutrition.
She was discharged from the hospital 4 months after the removal of the prosthesis. Six days later, she was readmitted to the emergency department with general weakness and itching, right hypochondrial and epigastric pain, nausea, and vomiting for 4 days. Her family had noticed yellow discoloration of the sclerae for 2 days. At that time, she was taking linezolid and meropenem for 50 days and was receiving home total parenteral nutrition (Structokabiven 12 g N (Fresenius®), supplemented with vitamins and oligo-elements) for 36 consecutive days. Additional medication consisted of vitamin D, calcium, domperidone, esomeprazole, enoxaparin, and dorzolamide–timolol eye drops. Upon admission, she had a temperature of 37°C, a pulse rate of 103/min, a blood pressure of 110/60 mmHg, and a respiratory rate of 36 breaths per minute. Clinical examination showed an icteric and dehydrated patient in poor general condition. She was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) because of progressive encephalopathy, grade 3 (presence of apathy, somnolence, and disorientation). The abdomen was tender, especially in the right hypochondriac region, but there was no peritoneal irritation. On admission, blood analysis showed a severe lactic acidosis: pH 7.27 (normal 7.35–7.45), bicarbonate 11.2 mmol/l (normal 22–26), lactate 121 mg/dl (normal 9–16), and cholestasis (gamma-glutamyltransferase 559 U/l (normal 9–36), alkaline phosphatase 2,486 U/l (normal 30–120), total bilirubin 12.1 mg/dl (normal 0.3–1.2), direct bilirubin 8.83 mg/dl (normal 0–0.30)). Transaminases were slightly elevated: aspartate aminotransferase 97 U/l (normal 0–31) and alanine aminotransferase 113 U/l (normal 7–31); and thrombocytopenia was present: 84,000/µl (normal 177,000–393,000). The prothrombin time ratio was 50% (normal 70–120%). In European laboratories, the prothrombin time is usually expressed as a ratio (rather than as seconds) (patient’s prothrombin time divided by mean normal prothrombin time (pooled plasma)). The serum ammonia was elevated up to 86 µmol/l (normal 11–48). She also had a mild elevation of the serum creatinine on admission of 1.07 mg/dl (normal 0.55–0.96). In the presence of impaired synthetic function (decreased prothrombin time and spontaneous hypoglycemia), encephalopathy and icterus having occurred within less than 6 weeks, a diagnosis of acute liver failure was made. Initially, she was hemodynamically and respiratory stable. There were no signs of cardiac ischemia based on cardiac enzymes, electrocardiography, and transthoracic echocardiography. There were no focal signs of intercurrent infection. Linezolid, meropenem, and total parenteral nutrition were discontinued, and continuous hemodialysis was started because of persistent lactic acidosis within 24 h of ICU admission.
The patient could not be weaned from the ventilator postoperatively due to the encephalopathy. Lactic acidosis resolved over a few days. Hemodialysis was discontinued after 4 days. The prothrombin time ratio increased but cholestasis persisted. Repetitive ultrasound revealed no dilated intrahepatic or extrahepatic bile ducts. The patient was weaned from the ventilator after 12 days of mechanical ventilation and could be discharged from the intensive care unit after 16 days. Bilirubin levels normalized within 14 weeks. In this period, alkaline phosphatase and gamma-glutamyltransferase levels returned to the patients’ baseline values (Table 1).
Meropenem was restarted 1 month later because of persisting osteomyelitis, and no increases in liver function tests were observed. The patient however died 4 months after her first ICU admission because of uncontrollable septic shock.
DILI has been associated with the use of nearly 1,000 drugs and may mimic all forms of acute and chronic hepatobiliary disease [5, 6]. A diagnosis of DILI is expressed in terms of increasing probability, as conclusive proof is often lacking. The Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences/Roussel Ucalf Causality Assessment Method scale [6–8] is developed to quantify the strength of the association between hepatic injury and medication as its suspected cause. The system comprises seven weighted criteria (time to onset following initial drug exposure, course of the reaction, presence of risk factors, concomitant drug exposure, exclusion of nondrug causes of liver injury, previous information regarding the known hepatotoxic potential of the drug, and response to rechallenge) in addition to the type of liver injury (hepatocellular or cholestatic/mixed). We calculated a score of 6 in our patient, which corresponds to a probable association between linezolid and DILI. Elevation of liver enzymes in patients treated with linezolid has been described before , but severe DILI with signs of hepatic failure, as in our patient, has not yet been reported. The time course of liver dysfunction in our patient reflects that of previous case reports of patients developing linezolid-induced lactic acidosis (which was also present in our patient), both in terms of onset (after more than 6 weeks of linezolid) and of resolution following drug withdrawal and institution of supportive therapy. It is noteworthy that resolution of DILI after drug withdrawal may be delayed, in particular the cholestatic pattern which may take up to 1 year to resolve .
We intensively sought for alternative causes of liver injury. Screening tests for viral hepatitis, hereditary hemochromatosis, α1-antitrypsin deficiency, and Wilson’s disease were negative, and medical imaging ruled out biliary obstruction, cardiac dysfunction, or hepatic vascular abnormality. The liver did not show ischemia on laparoscopy. Despite the presence of some anti-smooth-muscle antibodies, light microscopy of the liver biopsy revealed no autoimmune hepatitis or primary biliary cirrhosis.
In our patient, the predominant pattern of liver histology was that of diffuse microvesicular steatosis. It is identified by the presence of small, uniform lipid droplets dispersed throughout the hepatocyte, which leave the nucleus in the center of the cell. Microvesicular steatosis may, in severe cases, rapidly evolve to liver failure, coma, and death. While some hepatocytes exhibit microvesicular fat, others may exhibit macrovacuolar steatosis in the same patient. These mixed cases should be classified as microvesicular steatosis, since the latter may entail a more severe prognosis [10–12]. Various endogenous and exogenous substances impair mitochondrial ß-oxidation to cause microvesicular steatosis (for an overview, see references [10, 12]). Our patient was not taking any of these medications, and she denied the use of any over-the-counter drugs, herbal products, or alcohol.
Microvesicular steatosis is related to severe impairment of the mitochondrial ß-oxidation of fatty acids. Linezolid exerts its antimicrobial effect through inhibition of bacterial protein synthesis by binding to the 23S ribosomal RNA of the 50S subunit. The mitochondrial protein synthesis machinery however is in many ways similar to the prokaryotic machinery and as a result may be a collateral target for antibiotics that function by binding to the bacterial ribosome such as linezolid and tetracyclines [2, 10, 13, 14]. Mitochondrial dysfunction is also the key mechanism responsible for linezolid-induced lactic acidosis [14, 15]. Finally, it should be mentioned that other antimicrobial oxazolidinones, more precisely the early derivatives investigated by DuPont in the 1980s , and newer potent molecules (PNU-140693 and PNU-141059)  are known to induce hepatic toxicity in animal models. Interestingly, in the lactic acidosis case patient of De Vrieze et al., macrovesicular and microvesicular steatoses were also seen on histological examination of liver samples. In contrast to our patient, elevation of the liver function tests or clinical symptoms associated with liver failure, with the exception of encephalopathy, were not mentioned for this case patient .
We considered the possibility of DILI being associated with therapy coadministered with linezolid (total parenteral nutrition and meropenem). Parenteral nutrition is a known cause of liver dysfunction, ranging from mild elevations of serum aminotransferases, alkaline phosphatase, and bilirubin to steatosis, steatohepatitis (predominantly in adults), and cholestasis (predominantly in infants). When steatosis is related to the use of parenteral nutrition, macrovesicular steatosis is the predominant finding observed on biopsy specimen . Scarce articles describe both microvesicular and macrovesicular steatoses with the use of parenteral nutrition . The purely microvesicular steatosis with associated bile duct damage in our patient, coupled with the fulminant course of liver dysfunction, argues against parenteral nutrition as the main etiology. The possibility remains however that total parenteral nutrition has contributed to the development of severe DILI in our patient. Elevation of liver function tests, especially transaminases, during meropenem therapy has been described in 2% to 5% of the treated patients . A more thorough search of the literature showed no reports on severe hepatic failure or microvesicular steatosis. In our patient, meropenem rechallenge was not followed by recurrence of elevation of the transaminases.
The fact that our patient presented with signs of cholestasis 2 months prior to starting linezolid is a limitation in this report. As our patient already had received multiple antibiotic regimens and parenteral nutrition, the presence of an underlying preexisting liver injury is possible. However, from the time course of liver function tests, it shows that treatment with linezolid coincided with the occurrence of a new hepatotoxic event.
In conclusion, we believe that, in our patient, DILI with fulminant liver failure and lactic acidosis were probably related to prolonged use of linezolid. Clinicians should be aware of this rare but life-threatening adverse effect.
Conflict of interest
The authors state that there are no potential conflicts of interest or funding.