Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Socio-Economic Determinants of Abortion Rates

  • Published:
Sexuality Research and Social Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Abortion rates are increasing all around the world, especially for young women. Our proposals for public policies to reduce unwanted pregnancies are based on an analysis of the socio-economic determinants of abortion rates. Special attention is paid to regional levels of alcohol consumption, living conditions, and public spending on health and education. We carry out estimations using data on regions in Spain from 1999 to 2004. There is empirical evidence that socioeconomic conditions, lifestyles, and regional characteristics determine regional abortion rates. Our results suggest that it is important to design public policies to reduce alcohol abuse, improve citizens’ working conditions, and promote gender equality through government-subsidised childcare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arranz, J. M., & Gil-Lacruz, A. I. (2009). Traffic accidents, deaths and alcohol consumption. Applied Economics, 41, 2583–2595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babela, J. R. M., Massamba, A., Bantsimba, T., & Senga, P. (2008). Sexual behaviour among adolescent in Brazzaville, Congo. Journal de Gynécologie, Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, 37, 510–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bankole, A., Singh, S., & Haas, T. (1999). Characteristics of women who obtain induced abortion, a worldwide review. International Family Planning Perspectives, 25, 68–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besculides, M., & Laraque, F. (2004). Unintended pregnancy among the urban poor. Journal of Urban Health, 81, 340–348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boland, R., & Katzive, L. (2008). Developments in laws on induced abortion: 1998–2007. International Journal of Family Planning Perspectives, 34, 110–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cano-Serral, G., Rodriguez-Sanz, M., Borrell, C., Perez, M. M., & Salvador, J. (2006). Socioeconomic inequalities in the provision and uptake of prenatal care. Gaceta Sanitaria, 20, 25–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, K. A. M., Sant’Anna, M. J., Coates, V., & Omar, H. A. (2008). Medical students: abuse of psychoactive substances and sexuality aspects. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 20, 321–328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, P. K. (2006). Resolution of unwanted pregnancy during adolescence through abortion versus childbirth: individual and family predictors and psychological consequences. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35, 903–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, P., & Tauchen, G. (1984). The effect of minimum drinking age legislation on youthful auto fatalities, 1970–1977. The Journal of Legal Studies, 13, 169–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Rey, J. (2005). The social problem of pregnancy in teenagers. Annual Research Academy of National Medicine, 122, 149–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekstrand, M., Tyden, T., Darj, E., & Larsson, M. (2007). Preventing pregnancy: a girls’ use, seventeen year-old Swedish boys’ perceptions on abortion, reproduction and use of contraception. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 12, 111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, L. J., & Ridder, E. M. (2006). Abortion in young women and subsequent mental health. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 16–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Font-Ribera, L., Perez, G., Salvador, J., & Borrell, C. (2008). Socioeconomic inequalities in unintended pregnancy and abortion decision. Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 85, 125–135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gjonca, A., Aassve, A., & Mencarini, L. (2008). Trends and patterns, proximate determinants and policies of fertility change. Demographic Research, 19, 261–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, M. A., Sola, A., Cortes, M. J., & Mira, J. J. (2007). Sexual behaviour and contraception in people under the age of 20 in Alicante. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 12, 125–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, M., & Markowitz, S. (2005). I did what last night? Adolescent risky sexual behavior and substance use. Eastern Economic Journal, 31, 383–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, M., Sindelar, J., Mullahy, J., & Anderson, R. (1993). Policy watch. Alcohol and cigarette taxes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7, 211–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, N., & Gaudoin, M. (2007). Teenagers requesting pregnancy termination are no less responsible about contraceptive use at the time of conception than older women. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 114, 226–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kero, A., Hogberg, U., Jacobsson, L., & Lalos, A. (2001). Legal abortion: a painful necessity. Social Science & Medicine, 53, 1481–1490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, M., Tyden, T., Hanson, U., & Haggstrom-Nordin, E. (2007). Contraceptive use and associated factors among Swedish high school students. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 12, 119–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K. O. (1984). The status of women: a review of its relationships to fertility and mortality. New York: The Rockefeller Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oltmans-Ananat, E., Gruber, J., Levine, P. B., & Staiger, D. (2009). Abortion and selection. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91, 124–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paton, D. (2002). The economics of family planning and underage conceptions. Journal of Health Economics, 21, 207–225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, W., Samuelsen, S. O., & Eskild, A. (2006). Abortion among young women—the importance of family environment factors and social class. Tidsskrift for den Norske Lægeforening, 126, 1734–1737.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prager, S. W., Steinauer, J. E., Foster, D. G., Darney, P. D., & Drey, E. A. (2007). Risk factors for repeat elective abortion. American Journal of Obstetrician Gynaecology, 197, 575–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raatikainen, K., Heiskanen, N., & Heinonen, S. (2006). Induced abortion: not an independent risk factor for pregnancy outcome, but a challenge for health counselling. Annals of Epidemiology, 16, 587–592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, D. I., Argys, I. M., & Averett, S. L. (2001). New evidence on the relationship between substance use and adolescent sexual behaviour. Journal of Health Economics, 20, 835–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, H. J., Kirkman, M., Hardiman, E. A., Mallett, S., Rosenthal, D. A., & Doreen, A. (2009). Considering abortion: a 12-month audit of records of women contacting a pregnancy advisory service. Medical Journal of Australia, 190, 69–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salvini, S., & Schifini, S. (1996). Induced abortion in Italy: levels, trends and characteristics. Family Planning Perspective, 28, 267–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santelli, J. S., Lindberg, L. D., Orr, M. G., Finer, L. B., & Speizer, I. (2009). Toward a multidimensional measure of pregnancy intentions: evidence from the United States. Studies in Family Planning, 40, 87–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santow, G., & Bracher, M. (2003). Explaining in teenage childbearing in Sweden. Studies in Family Planning, 30, 169–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, B. (2002). Does alcohol use increase the risk of sexual intercourse among adolescents? Evidence from the NLSY97. Journal of Health Economics, 21, 1085–1093.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sihvo, S., Bajos, N., Ducot, B., Kaminski, M., & Cocon Group. (2003). Women’s life cycle and abortion decision in unintended pregnancies. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57, 601–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sing, S., Wulf, D., Hussain, R., Bankole, A., & Sedgh, G. (2009). Abortion worldwide: a decade of uneven progress. New York: Guttmacher Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. (1993). Influence of socioeconomic factors on attaining targets for reducing teenage pregnancies. British Medical Journal, 306, 1232–1235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, J. R., & Russo, N. F. (2008). Abortion and anxiety: what is the relationship? Social Science & Medicine, 67, 238–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorsen, C., Aneblom, G., & Gemzell-Danielsson, K. (2006). Perceptions of contraception, non-protection and induced abortion among a sample of urban Swedish teenage girls: Focus group discussions. The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care, 11(4), 302–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valero, C., Nebot, M., & Villalbi, J. R. (1994). Adolescent pregnancy in Barcelona: its distribution, antecedents and consequences. Gaceta Sanitaria, 8, 155–161.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, Y., Kaneita, Y., Yokoyama, E., Sone, T., Takemura, S., Suzuki, K., et al. (2008). Alcohol consumption and abstention among pregnant Japanese women. Journal of Epidemiology, 18, 173–182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young, D. J., & Bielinska-Kwapisz, A. (2006). Alcohol prices, consumption and traffic fatalities. Southern Economic Journal, 72(3), 690–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavodny, M. (2001). The effect of partners’ characteristics on teenage pregnancy and its resolution. Family Planning Perspective, 33, 192–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlin, J. A., Saurel-Cubizolles, M. J., Ancel, P. Y., & EUROPOP Group. (2002). Marital status, cohabitation, and the risk of preterm birth in Europe: where births outside marriage are common and uncommon. Paediatric Prenatal Epidemiology, 16, 124–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Esc. Universidad de Ingeniería Técnica Industrial, Departamento Dirección y Organización de Empresa, Universidad de Zaragoza, C/María de Luna, 50018, Zaragoza, Spain

    Ana I. Gil-Lacruz

  2. Departamento de Psicología y Sociología, Esc. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y del Trabajo, Universidad de Zaragoza, Violante de Hungría, 23, 50009, Zaragoza, Spain

    Marta Gil-Lacruz

  3. Departamento Dirección y Organización de Empresa, Facultad de Economía y Empresa, Universidad de Zaragoza, C/María de Luna, 50018, Zaragoza, Spain

    Estrella Bernal-Cuenca

Authors
  1. Ana I. Gil-Lacruz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marta Gil-Lacruz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Estrella Bernal-Cuenca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana I. Gil-Lacruz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gil-Lacruz, A.I., Gil-Lacruz, M. & Bernal-Cuenca, E. Socio-Economic Determinants of Abortion Rates. Sex Res Soc Policy 9, 143–152 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-011-0056-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-011-0056-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation