Skip to main content
Log in

New and Fast Block Bootstrap-Based Prediction Intervals for GARCH(1,1) Process with Application to Exchange Rates

  • Published:
Sankhya A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a new bootstrap algorithm to obtain prediction intervals for generalized autoregressive conditionally heteroscedastic (GARCH(1,1)) process which can be applied to construct prediction intervals for future returns and volatilities. The advantages of the proposed method are twofold: it (a) often exhibits improved performance and (b) is computationally more efficient compared to other available resampling methods. The superiority of this method over the other resampling method-based prediction intervals is explained with Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. The finite sample properties of the proposed method are also illustrated by an extensive simulation study and a real-world example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, T.G. and Bollerslev, T. (1998). Answering the skeptics: yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts. Int. Econ. Rev. 39, 885–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T.G., Bollerslev, T., Diebold, F.X. and Labys, P. (2001). The distribution of realized exchange rate volatility. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 96, 42–55.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Athreya, K. and Lahiri, S. 1994. Measure theory and probability theory. Springer.

  • Baillie, R.T. and Bollerslev, T. (1992). Prediction in dynamic models with time-dependent conditional variances. J. Econ. 52, 91–113.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Beyaztas, B., Firuzan, E. and Beyaztas, U. 2016. New block bootstrap methods: Sufficient and/or ordered. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation. doi:10.1080/03610918.2015.1066808.

  • Bilingsley, P. 1994. Probability and measure, 3rd ed. Wiley.

  • Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. J. Econ. 31, 307–327.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Carlstein, E. (1986). The use of subseries values for estimating the variance of a general statistic from a stationary sequence. Ann. Stat. 14, 1171–1179.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, B., Gel Y.R., Balakrishna, N. and Abraham, B. (2011). Computationally efficient bootstrap prediction intervals for returns and volatilities in arch and garch processes. J. Forecast. 30, 51–71.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann. Stat. 7, 1–26.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R.F. and Patton, A.J. (2001). What good is a volatility model. Quant. Fin. 1, 237–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgino, T. (2009). Computing and visualizing dynamic time warping alignments in r: the dtw package. J. Stat. Softw. 31, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (1985). Resampling a coverage pattern. Stoch. Process. Appl. 20, 231–246.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. 1992. The Bootstrap and Edgeworth Expansion. Springer.

  • Hall, P., Horowitz, J.L. and Jing, B. (1995). On blocking rules for the bootstrap with dependent data. Biometrika 82, 561–574.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, E.J. and Rissanen, J. (1982). Recursive estimation of mixed autoregressive-moving average order. Biometrika 69, 81–94.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P.R. and Lunde, A. (2005). A forecast comparison of volatility models: does anything beat a garch(1,1)? J. Appl. Econ. 20, 873–889.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, E. and Shin, D.W. (2013). Stationary bootstrap prediction intervals for garch (p, q). Commun. Stat. Appl. Methods 20, 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunsch, H.R. (1989). The jackknife and the bootstrap for general stationary observations. Ann. Stat. 17, 1217–1241.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri, S.N. 2003. Resampling methods for dependent data. Springer.

  • Miguel, J.A. and Olave, P. (1999). Bootstrapping forecast intervals in arch models. Test 8, 345–364.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D.B. (1990). Stationarity and persistence in the garch(1,1) model. Econ. Theory 6, 318–334.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pascual, L., Romo, J. and Ruiz, E. (2006). Bootstrap prediction for returns and volatilities in garch models. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 50, 2293–2312.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Politis, D.N. and Romano, J.P. (1992). A circular block-resampling procedure for stationary data. Explor. Limits Bootstrap 263–270.

  • Politis, D.N. and Romano, J.P. (1994). The stationary bootstrap. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 89, 1303–1313.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ratanamahatana, C.A. and Keogh, E. 2004. Everything you know about dynamic time warping is wrong. Third Workshop on Mining Temporal and Sequential Data.

  • Reeves, J.J. (2005). Bootstrap prediction intervals for arch models. Int. J. Forecast. 21, 237–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thombs, L.A. and Schucany, W.R. (1990). Bootstrap prediction intervals for autoregression. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 85, 486–492.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank two anonymous referees for careful reading of the paper and valuable suggestions and comments, which have helped us produce a significantly better paper. We are also grateful to the Editor for offering the opportunity to publish our work. Beste and Ufuk Beyaztas gratefully acknowledge the support from Department of Mathematics, Lehigh University, where major part of this work was done while they were visiting there in 2015–2016. Ufuk Beyaztas was supported by a grant from the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) grant no: 1059B141500288. Soutir Bandyopadhyay’s work has been partially supported by NSF-DMS 1406622.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soutir Bandyopadhyay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beyaztas, B.H., Beyaztas, U., Bandyopadhyay, S. et al. New and Fast Block Bootstrap-Based Prediction Intervals for GARCH(1,1) Process with Application to Exchange Rates. Sankhya A 80, 168–194 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13171-017-0098-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13171-017-0098-2

Keywords and phrases

AMS (2000) subject classification

Navigation