Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Country-of-origin preferences for organic food

  • Published:
Organic Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consumers in almost any country seem to prefer domestic food compared to foreign food. One reason for this finding is probably consumers believe foreign food to be of lower standard than domestic food. In the last years, international agreements about organic products have led to harmonization of regulations allowing organic food produced in one country to be sold as organic in another. A hypothesis is then whether consumers view a foreign food product with the identical organic label as a domestic counterpart as equivalent substitutes. This study uses an online choice experiment with conventional and organic veal to investigate country-of-origin preferences for organic meat. The results show that despite the fact that the organic label assures consumers that the meat has been produced under the same organic regulations the willingness to pay for organic meat depends greatly on the country of origin. Hence, common international labels for organic food do alleviate the huge skepticism toward foreign food.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alfnes F, Rickertsen K (2003) European consumers’ willingness to pay for US beef in experimental auction markets. Am J Agric Econ 85(2):396–405. doi:10.1111/1467-8276.t01-1-00128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alphonce R, Alfnes F (2012) Consumer willingness to pay for food safety in Tanzania: an incentive-aligned conjoint analysis. Int J Consum Stud 36(4):394–400. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01067.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Animalia (2015) Kjøttets tilstand 2015. Status i norsk kjøtt- og eggproduksjon. http://flashbook.no/animalia/kjottetstilstand15/#/1. Accessed 21 2016

  • Constanigro M, Thilmany McFadden D, Kroll S, Nurse G (2011) An in-store valuation of local and organic apples: the role of social desirability. Agribusiness 27(4):465–477. doi:10.1002/agr.20281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanigro M, Kroll S, Thilmany D, Bunning M (2014) Is it love for local/organic or hate for conventional? Asymmetric effects of information and taste on label preferences in an experimental auction. Food Qual Prefer 31:94–105. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehmke MD, Lusk JL, Tyner W (2008) Measuring the relative importance of preferences for country of origin in China, France, Niger, and the United States. Agric Econ 38(3):277–285. doi:10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00299.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2007) Council Regulation (EC) No. 834/2007 of 28 June 2007 on Organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing regulation (EEC) No. 2092/9.1

  • European Commission (2011) Council Regulation No. 1169/2011 on the Provision of Food information to consumers, amending Regulations No. 1924/2006 and No. 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Commission Directive 87/250/EEC, Council Directive 90/496/EEC, Commission Directive 1999/10/EC, Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Directives 2002/67/EC and 2008/5/EC and Commission Regulation No 608/2004

  • Eurostat (2013) Meat production and foreign trade

  • Gracia A, Barreiro-Hurlé J, López-Gálan B (2014) Are local and organic complement or substitutes? A consumer preferences study for eggs. J Agric Econ 65(1):49–67. doi:10.1111/1477-9552.12036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grane JH, Boys KA (2012) Agricultural trade and the GATT/WTO: does membership make a difference? Am J Agric Econ 94(1):1–24. doi:10.1093/ajae/aar087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidenstrøm N, Jacobsen E, Borgen SO (2011) Seleksjon og ignorering. Forbrukerstrategier for å manøvrere i merkemangfoldet. Oppdragsrapport no. 2-2011. National Institute for Consumer Research (SIFO), Oslo. http://www.sifo.no/files/file77467_oppdragsrapport_2-2011.pdf. Accessed 13 Oct 2015

  • Hempel C, Hamm U (2016) How important is local food to organic-minded consumers? Appetite 96:309–318. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.09.036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hensher D, Rose JM, Green WH (2005) Applied choice analysis: a primer. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Illichmann R, Abdulai A (2013) Analysis of consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay for organic food products in Germany. In: Contributed paper presented at the AAEA Annual Meeting, Washington. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/150980/2/Illichmann_Abdulai_AAEA%202013.pdf Accessed 13 Oct 2015

  • Kim R, Suwunnamek O, Toyoda T (2008) Consumer attitude towards organic labeling schemes in Japan. J Int Food Agrbus Mark 20(3):55–71. doi:10.1080/08974430802157622

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjærnes U, Poppe C, Lavik R (2005) Trust, distrust and food consumption. Project report no. 15-2005. National Institute for Consumer Research (SIFO), Oslo

  • Korn A, Hamm U (2014) Differentiation of rearing systems: is there a market for organic beef from extensive suckler cow husbandry? In: Rahman, G Aksoy U (Eds.) Proceedings of the 4th ISOFAR Scientific Conference, Istanbul, p 449–451. http://www.isofar.org/isofar/images/conferences/2014_owc/OWC14%20proceedings%20Volume%202%20web.pdf Accessed 8 Apr 2016

  • Kuhfeld WF (2010) Marketing research methods in SAS: experimental design, choice, conjoint, and graphical techniques. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavik R (2006) Grensehandelen 2006 - enkelte utviklingstrekk. Hurtigstatistikk fra SIFO-survey 2006. Prosjektnotat no. 4-2006. National Institute for Consumer Research (SIFO), Oslo

  • Lim KH, Hu W, Maynard LJ, Goddard E (2013) U.S. consumers’ preference and willingness to pay for country-of-origin-labeled beef steak and food safety enhancements. Can J Agric Econ 61(1):93–118. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7976.2012.01260.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loureiro ML, Umberger WJ (2005) Assessing consumer preferences for country-of-origin labeling. J Agric Appl Econ 37(1):49–63. doi:10.1017/S1074070800007094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y (2013) Consumer preference for eggs from enhanced animal welfare production systems: a stated choice analysis. In: Contributed paper at the AAEA Annual Meeting, Washington. https://atrium.lib.uoguelph.ca/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10214/7467/Lu_Yiqing_Aug_2013_MSc.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed 13 Oct 2015

  • Lusk JL, Briggeman BC (2009) Food values. Am J Agric Econ 9(1):184–196. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01175.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusk JL, Fields D, Prevatt W (2008) An incentive compatible conjoint ranking mechanism. Am J Agric Econ 90(2):487–498. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01119.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mennecke BE, Townsend AM, Hayes DJ, Lonergan SM (2007) A study of the factors that influence consumer attitudes toward beef products using the conjoint market analysis tool. J Anim Sci 85(10):2639–2659. doi:10.2527/jas.2006-495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mey BJV (2004) The globalization of food and how Americans feel about it: results of two surveys. J Food Distr Res 35(1):6–17. purl.umn.edu/27128

  • Norwegian Agricultural Agency (2016) Produksjon og omsetning av økologiske landbruksvarer. Rapport for 2015. Rapport no. 12/2016. https://www.slf.dep.no/no/miljo-og-okologisk/okologisk-landbruk/om-okologisk-landbruk/publikasjoner/_attachment/52164?_ts=15388c01cc8&download=true. Accessed 21 Apr 2016

  • Oikos 2012 Økologisk mat stadig rimeligere! http://www.oikos.no/aktuelt/okologisk-mat-stadig-rimeligere.aspx. Accessed 13 Oct 2015

  • Onozaka Y, Thilmany McFadden D (2011) Does local labeling complement or compete with other sustainable labels? A conjoint analysis of direct and joint values for fresh produce claims. Am J Agric Econ 93(3):693–706. doi:10.1093/ajae/aar005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson HH, Li X (2011) Consumer preferences for product origin and processing scale: the case of organic baby food. Am J Agric Econ 93(2):590–596. doi:10.1093/ajae/aaq153

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozo V, Saak A, Peterson HH (2009) Product origin and reputation for quality: the case of organic foods. In: Contributed Paper presented at the AAEA Annual Meeting, Milwaukee. http://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6553621.pdf. Accessed 15 Sept 2015

  • Realini CE, Font i Furnolsa M, Sañudob C, Montossic F, Olivera MA, Guerreroa L (2013) Spanish, French and British consumers’ acceptability of Uruguayan beef, and consumers’ beef choice associated with country of origin, finishing diet and meat price. Meat Sci 95(1):14–21. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shi L, Gao Z, House LA (2011) Consumer WTP for blueberry attributes: a hierarchical Bayesian approach in the WTP Space. In: Contributed Paper presented at the AAEA Annual Meeting, Pittsburgh. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/103524/2/AAEA%20paper%20Shi.pdf. Accessed 15 Sept 2015

  • Statistics Norway (2013a) Table 08460: cross border trade. Number of same day trips and expenditure. Statistics Norway (SSB), Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Norway (2013b) Table 07459: population, by sex and one-year age groups. Statistics Norway (SSB), Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Norway (2013c) Table 08921: persons 16 years and older, by sex age and level of education. Statistics Norway (SSB), Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Norway (2013d) Table 07752: households, by type of household and total household income. Statistics Norway (SSB), Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Norway (2014) Table 08811: external trade in goods, by commodity group, country and mode of transport. Statistics Norway (SSB), Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolz H (2011) Attitudes and behaviour towards food attributes and organic food – a triangular methodological investigation of occasional organic consumers. Dissertation, University of Kassel, Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences, Kassel. http://orgprints.org/20679. Accessed 13 Oct 2015

  • Synovate MMI (2012) Norske Spisefakta 2012. Synovate MMI, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Taha FA, Hahn WF (2013) Did the U.S BSE and EU27 HPAI outbreaks affect EU meat exports? Paper presented at the AAEA & CAES Joint Annual Meeting Washington DC. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.476.7161&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 16 Mar 2016

  • Tonsor GT, Schroeder TC, Lusk JL (2013) Consumer valuation of alternative meat origin labels. J Agric Econ 64(3):676–692. doi:10.1111/1477-9552.12010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Train K (2009) Discrete choice methods with simulation, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Umberger WJ, Feuz DM, Calkins CR, Sitz BM (2003) Country-of-origin labeling of beef products: U.S. consumers’ perceptions. J Food Distr Res 34(3):103–116

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture (2009) Country of origin labeling. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Washington. http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/cool. Accessed 13 Oct 2015

  • United States Department of Agriculture (2012) European Union and United States agree to historic new partnership on organic trade. News Release no. 0051.12. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Washington. http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome?contentid=2012/02/0051.xml. Accessed 13 Oct 2015

  • Wägeli S, Hamm U (2015) Consumers’ perception and expectations of local organic food supply chains. Org Agric. doi:10.1007/s13165-015-0130-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Wägeli S, Janssen M, Hamm U (2015) Organic consumers’ preferences and willingness-to-pay for locally produced animal products. Int J Con Stud 40(3):357–367. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Trade Organization (2014) Merchandise trade by commodity. World Trade Organization (WTO), Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Y, Li X, Peterson HH (2013) In pursuit of safe foods: Chinese preferences for soybean attributes in soymilk. Agribusiness 29(3):377–391. doi:10.1002/agr.21342

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is financed by the Foundation for Research Levy on Agricultural Products and the Agricultural Agreement Research Fund (grant no. 190424). I would like to thank Frode Alfnes, Lisbet Berg, Svein Ole Borgen and an anonymous referee for useful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Consumption Research Norway - SIFO, Oslo and Akershus University College for Applied Sciences (HiOA), P.O. BOX 4, St. Olavs plass, N-0130, Oslo, Norway

    Alexander Schjøll

  2. Akershus University College for Applied Sciences (HiOA), P.O. BOX 4, St. Olavs plass, N-0130, Oslo, Norway

    Alexander Schjøll

Authors
  1. Alexander Schjøll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Schjøll.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schjøll, A. Country-of-origin preferences for organic food. Org. Agr. 7, 315–327 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-016-0159-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-016-0159-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation