Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Consumers’ perception and expectations of local organic food supply chains

  • Published:
Organic Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Local production is becoming an increasingly important food attribute for consumers due to inter alia recent food scandals and the growing complexity of food production. Especially in the organic food market, local production is seen as an important additional value. Even though there is a high preference for local food, it is still unknown, what organic consumers know about the production process when buying what is believed to be local food. We analysed which parts of the supply chains have to be local so that consumers perceive a product as local. Feed production is a very important part of the supply chain of animal products, so we analysed consumers’ perception of local supply chains with a focus on feed origin. A focus group study in Germany using three groups of organic consumers reveals a low consumer awareness of feed origin and little consumer knowledge about animal feed and feeding. The results of the study indicate that organic consumers do not include the feed origin in their purchase decision. None of the participants was aware of the high import rate of organic feed stuffs to Germany. Nevertheless, the study findings show that organic consumers prefer organic animal products with complete local supply chains. The results suggest that the current situation with regard to feed production is not in line with consumers’ ideas of sustainable organic agriculture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams DC, Adams AE (2011) De-placing local at the farmers’ market: consumer conceptions of local foods. J Rural Soc Sc 26(2):74–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams DC, Salois MSJ (2010) Local versus organic. Renewable Agric Food Syst 25(4):331–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bean MK (2008) Consumer support for local and organic foods in Ohio. Graduate School of The Ohio State University, USA, Dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean M, Shar J (2011) Profiling alternative food system supporters: the personal and social basis of local and organic food support. Renewable Agric Food Syst 26(3):243–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernabéu R, Díaz M, Olmeda M (2010) Origin vs organic in Manchego cheese: which is more important? Br Food J 112(8):887–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernués A, Olaizola A, Corcoran K (2003) Extrinsic attributes of red meat as indicators of quality in Europe: an application for market segmentation. Food Qual Prefer 14(4):265–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bingen J, Sage J, Sirieix L (2011) Consumer coping strategies: a study of consumers committed to eating local. Int J Consum Stud 35(4):410–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouxin, A. (2013) Feed and food. Statistical Yearbook 2013. http://www.fefac.eu/files/57916.pdf. Accessed 27 February 2015

  • Bryman A (2008) Social research methods. University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchardi H, Schröder C, Thiele HD (2005) Willingness-to-pay for food of the own region: empirical estimates from hypothetical and incentive compatible settings. American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/19365/1/sp05bu02.pdf

  • Carlsson F, Frykblom P, Lagerkvist C (2006) Consumer benefits of labels and bans on GM foods. Am J Agric Econ 89:152–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpio CE, Isengildina-Massa O (2009) Consumer willingness to pay for locally grown products. Agribus 25(3):412–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain AJ, Kelley KM, Hyde J (2013) Comparing consumer preferences for locally grown and certified organic produce in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States. HortTechnology 23(1):74–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers S, Lobb A, Butler L, Harvey K, Traill W (2007) Local, national and imported foods: a qualitative study. Appetite 49(1):208–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chern WS, Rickertsen K, Nobuhiro T, Fu T (2002) Consumer acceptance and willingness to pay for genetically modified vegetable oil and salmon: a multiple-country assessment. J Agrobiotechnology Manag Econ 5(3):105–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung C, Boye T, Han S (2009) Valuing quality attributes and country of origin in the Korean beef market. J Agric Econ 60(3):682–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne JB, Chambers KJ, Giombolini KJ, Schlegel SA (2011) What does ‘local’ mean in the grocery store? Multiplicity in food retailers’ perspectives on sourcing and marketing local foods. Renewable Agric Food Syst 36(1):46–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2014) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 836/2014 of 31 July 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products with regard to organic production, labelling and control. Off J Eur Union L 230:10–11, 1.8.2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Feagan R (2007) The place of food: mapping out the ‘local’ in local food systems. Prog Hum Geogr 31:23–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feagan RB, Morris D (2009) Consumer quest for embeddedness: a case study of the Brantford Farmers’ Market. Int J Consum Stud 33:235–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldmann C, Hamm U (2015) Consumers’ perceptions and preferences for local food: a review. Food Qual Prefer 40:152–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finch H, Lewis J (2006) Focus groups. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J (eds) Qualitative research practice. Sage Publications, London, UK, pp 170–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Font i Furnols M, Realini C, Montossi F, Sañudo C, Campo M, Oliver M, Nute G, Guerrero L (2011) Consumer’s purchasing intention for lamb meat affected by country of origin, feeding system and meat price: a conjoint study in Spain, France and United Kingdom. Food Qual Prefer 22(5):443–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grebitus C, Lusk JL, Nayga RM (2013) Effect of distance of transportation on willingness to pay for food. Ecol Econ 88:67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenbaum TL (1998) The handbook for focus group research, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grunert K (2005) Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand. Eur Rev Agric Econ 33:369–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs JE (2003) Consumer demand for traceability. Working paper 03-1. International Agricultural Trade Research. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/14614/1/wp03-01.pdf.

  • Janssen M, Hamm U (2011) Consumer perception of different organic certification schemes in five European countries. Org Agric 1(1):31–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jekanowski MD, Williams DR II, Schiek WA (2000) Consumers’ willingness to purchase locally produced agricultural products: an analysis of an Indiana survey. Agric Resour Econ Rev 29(1):43–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerton S, Sinclair AJ (2010) Buying local organic food: a pathway to transformative learning. Agric Hum Values 27(4):401–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger J (1995) Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ 311:299–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff KH (2013) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger RA, Casey M (2009) Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research, 4th edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindh H, Olsson A (2010) Communicating imperceptible product attributes through traceability: a case study in an organic food supply chain. Renewable Agric Food Syst 25(4):263–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loureiro ML, Hine S (2002) Discovering niche markets: A comparison of consumer willingness to pay for local (Colorado grown), organic, and GMO-free products. J Agric Appl Econ 34(3):477–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loureiro ML, Umberger WJ (2003) Estimating consumer willingness to pay for country-of-origin labeling. JAgric Resour Econ 28(2):287–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Loureiro ML, Umberger WJ (2005) Assessing consumer preferences for country-of-origin labeling. J Agric Appl Econ 37(1):49–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusk JL, Briggeman BC (2009) Food values. Am J Agric Econ 91(1):184–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayring P (2000) Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2) Art. 20. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0002204. Accessed 2 March 2015

  • Mennecke B, Townsend A, Hayes DJ, Lonergan S (2007) A study of the factors that influence consumer attitudes toward beef products using the conjoint market analysis tool. J Anim Sci 85(10):2639–2659

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Migliore G, Schifani G, Cembalo L (2015) Opening the black box of food quality in the short supply chain: effects of conventions of quality on consumer choice. Food Qual Prefer 39:141–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan DL (2012) Focus groups and social interaction. In: Gubrium JF, Holstein JA, Marvasti AB, McKinney KD (eds) The SAGE handbook of interview research, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, USA, pp 161–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris C, Kirwan J (2011) Ecological embeddedness: an interrogation and refinement of the concept within the context of alternative food networks in the UK. J Rural Stud 27(3):322–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naspetti S, Bodini A (2008) Consumer perception of local and organic products: substitution or complementary goods? Int J Inter Soc Sc 3

  • Ngapo T, Dransfield E, Martin J, Magnusson M, Bredahl L, Nute G (2004) Consumer perceptions: pork and pig production. Insights from France, England. Meat Sci 66(1):125–134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nygard B, Storstad O (1998) De-globalization of food markets? Consumer perceptions of safe food: the case of Norway. Sociol Rural 38(1):35–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padel S (2005) Overview of supply and demand for concentrated organic feed in the EU in 2002 and 2003 with a particular focus on protein sources for mono-gastric animals. D41 (2) Report sub-work package 4.2 in the EU project. Research to support the EU regulation on Organic Agriculture. University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Great Britain, http://orgprints.org/8854/. Accessed 2 March 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Padel S, Röcklinsberg H, Verhoog H, Alroe H F, de Wit J, Kjeldsen C, Schmid O (2007) Balancing and integrating basic values in the development of organic regulations and standards: proposal for a procedure using case studies of conflicting areas. Report from the Organic Revision Project, Aberystwyth. http://www.organic-revision.org/pub/D_2_3_Integrating_values_final_2007.pdf. Accessed 2 March 2015

  • Perreault WD, Leigh LE (1989) Reliability of nominal data based on qualitative judgments. JMR 26:135–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter WJ, Levine‐Donnerstein D (1999) Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. J Appl Commun Res 27(3):258–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell RA, Single HM (1996) Methodology matters. Focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 8(5):499–504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie J, Spencer L, O’Connor W (2006) Carrying out qualitative analysis. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J (eds) Qualitative research practice. Sage Publications Ltd, London, Great Britain, pp 219–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Roininen K, Arvola A, Lahteenmaki L (2006) Exploring consumers’ perceptions of local food with two different qualitative techniques: laddering and word association. Food Qual Prefer 17(1–2):20–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roosen J, Lusk JL, Fox JA (2003) Consumer demand for and attitudes toward alternative beef labeling strategies in France, Germany, and the UK. Agribus 19(1):77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleenbecker R, Hamm U (2013) Consumers’ perception of organic product characteristics: a review. Appetite 71:420–429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schreier M (2012) Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Schupp A, Gillespie J (2001) Consumer attitudes toward potential country-of-origin labeling of fresh or frozen beef. J Food Dist Res 32(3):34–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Sehrer W, Kropp C, Brunner KM, Engel A, Ader D (2005) Potentiale für eine Verbreitung der ökologischen Lebensmittelnachfrage im Zuge der Agrarwende. BMBF-Forschungsprojekt: Von der Agrarwende zur Konsumwende? München. http://www.konsumwende.de/Dokumente/Potentiale%20f%FCr%20Lebensmittelnachfrage.PDF. Accessed 2 March 2015

  • Sirieix L, Kledal PR, Sulitang T (2011) Organic food consumers’ trade-offs between local or imported, conventional or organic products. Int J Consum Stud 35(3):670–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stranieri S, Banterle A (2009) Fresh meat and traceability labelling: who cares? International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks. February 15–20, 2009. Innsbruck-Igls, Austria. http://purl.umn.edu/58710. Accessed 2 March 2015

  • Thilmany D, Bond CA, Bond JK (2008) Going local. Am J Agric Econ 90(5):1303–1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toler S, Briggeman BC, Lusk JL, Adams DC (2009) Fairness, farmers markets and local production. Am J Agric Econ 91(5):1272–1278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tregear A, Kuznesof S, Moxey A (1998) Policy initiatives for regional foods. Food Policy 23(5):383–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umberger WJ, McFadden DDT, Smith AR (2009) Does altruism play a role in determining U.S. consumer preferences and willingness to pay for natural and regionally produced beef? Agribus 25(2):268–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waver M, Bates S, Connolly K (2011) Supermarkets on dioxin alert over contaminated egg products. The guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/jan/07/supermarkets-dioxin-contaminated-eggs. Accessed 2 March 2015

  • Xue H, Mainville D, You W, Nayga RM Jr (2010) Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for grass-fed beef: empirical evidence from in-store experiments. Food Qual Prefer 21(7):857–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zander K, Hamm U (2010) Consumer preferences for additional ethical attributes of organic food. Food Qual Prefer 21(5):495–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanoli R, Naspetti S (2002) Consumer motivations in the purchase of organic food. A means-end approach. Br Food J 104(8):643–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zepeda L, Deal D (2009) Organic and local food consumer behaviour. Int J Consum Stud 33(6):697–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zepeda L, Leviten-Reid C (2004) Consumers’ views on local food. J Food Dist 35(3):1–6

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments which helped to significantly improve the text and Ms. Anne Christopherson for the thorough language check.

Compliance with ethical standards

Compliance with the ethical standards of the journal is given.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

There was no third body funding for this research study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrich Hamm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wägeli, S., Hamm, U. Consumers’ perception and expectations of local organic food supply chains. Org. Agr. 6, 215–224 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-015-0130-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-015-0130-6

Keywords

Navigation