Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Work flexibility of organic suckler sheep farms in France

  • Published:
Organic Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Labour influences the liveability of organic sheep farms and the sustainability of this activity on rural areas. The aim of this study was to analyse work flexibility of organic suckler sheep farms using the criterion ‘room for manoeuvre in time’. A survey about work organisation was conducted on 14 organic sheep farms in the central region of France to quantify work durations and tasks carried out by different categories of workers in order to calculate the room for manoeuvre in time. Statistical analysis was performed to analyse variability in room for manoeuvre. A cluster analysis conducted on four variables describing room for manoeuvre in time over the year classified the farms into three groups. The results show that the room for manoeuvre in time per person displayed a broad variability according to the farms (396 to 1,199 h per year). The amount of routine work per person of the basic group was one factor explaining the differences. Results show different ways to obtain room for manoeuvre in time and its temporal distribution over the year, among organic suckler sheep farms. Three repartitions were identified. Group 1 was characterised by a low room for manoeuvre in winter, corresponding to the period of lambing in the sheep barn. The high routine workload was carried out self-sufficiently by the basic group. Group 2 had a high room for manoeuvre over the year. The farmers delegated a part of the routine work during holidays. Group 3 had a low room for manoeuvre over the year. These farms had lambings throughout the year due to several different lambing periods. Their low room for manoeuvre was also explained by a farmer's dual jobholding or by diversification of farm activities (slaughter, direct sales). The paper concludes identifying potential labour solutions to increase the flexibility of work organisation such as simplification of flock management or delegation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agreste (2011). GraphAgri France 2011, Ministère de l'Agriculture, de la Pêche et de l'Alimentation. SCEES. Service Central des Enquêtes et Etudes Statistique. Paris, France, http://www.agreste.agriculture.gouv.fr/publications/graphagri/article/graphagri-france-2010. Accessed 26 July 2012

  • Astigarraga L, Ingrand S (2011) Production flexibility in extensive beef farming systems. Ecology and Society 16(1):7. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art7/

  • Bellon S, Prache S, Benoit M, Cabaret J (2009) Recherches en élevage biologique: enjeux, acquis et développements. INRA Prod Anim 22:271–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoit M, Tournadre H, Dulply JP, Laignel G, Prache S, Cabaret J (2009) Is intensification of reproduction rhythm sustainable in an organic sheep production system? A 4-year interdisciplinary study. Anim 3:753–763

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benoit M, Tournadre H, Laignel G (2005) Performances techniques et économiques de 2 troupeaux ovins expérimentaux conduits en Agriculture Biologique (AB). Journée Rencontre Recherches Ruminants 12:4

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoit M, Veysset P (2003) Conversion of cattle and sheep suckler farming to organic farming: adaptation of the farming system and its economic consequences. Livest Prod Sci 80:141–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonneviale JR, Jussiau R, Marshall E, Bonneau P, Capillon A (1989) Approche globale de l'exploitation agricole—comprendre le fonctionnement de l'exploitation agricole: une méthode pour la formation et le développement. INRAP FOUCHER, Dijon

    Google Scholar 

  • Bué J (1989) Les différentes formes de flexibilité. Travail et Emploi 41:7

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdella N, Dobremez L, Madelrieux S (2009) Livestock farming systems in urban mountain regions. Differentiated paths to remain in time. Outlook on agriculture 38:127–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chauvat S (2010) Référentiel travail en élevages ovins viande. Synthèse de 137 Bilans Travail. Document collection RMT Travail en élevage, p 24. http://www.inst-elevage.asso.fr/IMG/pdf_4_Referentiel_travail_Ovins_viande_WEB.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2012

  • Cobb D, Feber R, Hopkins A, Stockdale L, O'Riordan T, Clements B, Firbank L, Goulding K, Jarvis S, Macdonald D (1999) Integrating the environmental and economic consequences of converting to organic agriculture: evidence from a case study. Land Use Policy 16:207–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cournut S, Chauvat S (2010) Work organization in livestock farms and farm liveability. In: Darnhofer I, Grötzer M (eds) Building sustainable rural futures. The added value of systems approaches in times of change and uncertainty. IFSA, Vienna, pp 1148–1157

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnhofer I, Bellon S, Dedieu B, Milestad R (2010) Adaptiveness to enhance the sustainability of farming systems. A review. Agron Sustain Devt 30:545–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dedieu B (2009) Qualification of the adaptive capacities of livestock farming systems. Rev Bras Zootecn 38:397–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dedieu B, Ingrand S (2010) Incertitude et adaptation: cadres théoriques et application à l'analyse de la dynamique des systèmes d'élevage. INRA Prod Anim 23:81–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs T (2006) Challenges facing a second green revolution: expanding the reach of organic agriculture. Crop Management. doi:10.1094/CM-2006-0921-02-RV

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer B, Gronhaug K (2004) Uncertainty, flexibility, and sustained competitive advantage. J Bus Manag 57:484–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufour A, Dedieu B (2010) Rapports au temps de travail et modes d'organisation en élevage laitier. Cahiers Agricultures 19:377–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Errington A, Gasson R (1996) The increasing flexibility of the farm and horticultural workforce in England and Wales. J Rural Stud 12:127–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escoffier B, Pagès J (1998) Analyses factorielles simples et multiples. Editions Dunod, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris CP, Frost JP, Binnie RC, Patterson DC (2006) Dairy cows performance and labour inputs associated with two silage feeding systems. Grass and Forage Sci 61:304–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flaten O, Lien G, Koesling M, Valle PS, Ebbesvik M (2005) Comparing risk perceptions and risk management in organic and conventional dairy farming: empirical results from Norway. Livest Prod Sci 95:11–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grenier J, Guillerand L, Molinier A, Valleix S, Feuillade S (2012) Bio Massif. Bulletin du Pôle Bio du Massif Central, Février, pp 11–12

  • Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL (1987) Multivariate data analysis, 2nd edn. MacMillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (2001) Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4:390–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hostiou N, Dedieu B (2012) A method for assessing work productivity and flexibility in livestock farms. Anim 6:852–862

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hostiou N, Fagon J (2012) Simplification des conduites d'élevage: analyse transversale des pratiques mises en œuvre dans les filières herbivores et granivores. INRA Prod Anim 25:127–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RA, Wichern DW (1982) Applied multivariate analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Jouven M, Lapeyronie P, Moulin CH, Bocquier F (2010) Rangeland utilization in Mediterranean farming systems. Anim 4:1746–1757

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laignel G, Benoit M (2004) Production de viande ovine en agriculture biologique comparée à l'élevage conventionnel. Résultats technico-économiques d'exploitations de plaine et de montagne du nord du Massif central. INRA Prod Anim 17:133–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamine C, Bellon S (2009) Conversion to organic farming: a multidimensional research object at the crossroads of agricultural and social sciences. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 29:97–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madelrieux S, Dedieu B (2008) Qualification and assessment of work organization in livestock farms. Anim 2:453–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martel G, Dourmad JY, Dedieu B (2008) Do labour productivity and preferences about work load distribution affect reproduction management and performance in pig farms? Livest Sci 118:96–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nozières MO, Moulin CH, Dedieu B (2011) The herd, a source of flexibility for livestock farming systems faced with uncertainties? Anim 5:1442–1457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olaizola AM, Chertouh T, Manrique E (2008) Adoption of a new feeding technology in Mediterranean sheep farming systems: implications and economic evaluation. Small Ruminant Res 79:137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rammel C (2003) Sustainable development and innovations: lessons from the Red Queen. Int J Sustain Dev 6:395–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reix R (1979) La flexibilité de l'entreprise. Éditions Cujas, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedel JL, Casasús I, Bernués A (2007) Sheep farming intensification and utilization of natural resources in a Mediterranean pastoral agro-ecosystem. Livest Sci 111:153–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toro-Mujica P, García A, Gómez-Castro A, Perea J, Rodríguez-Estévez V, Angón E, Barba C (2012) Organic dairy sheep farms in south-central Spain: typologies according to livestock management and economic variables. Small Ruminant Res 104:28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundrum A (2001) Organic livestock farming: a critical review. Livest Prod Sci 67:207–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out as part of the DynRurABio project financed by the ‘Agence Nationale de la Recherche’.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Inra, UMR1273 Métafort, F-63122, Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France

    N. Hostiou

  2. AgroParisTech, UMR Métafort, F-63170, Aubière, France

    N. Hostiou

  3. Clermont Université, VetAgro Sup, UMR Métafort, F-63370, Lempdes, France

    N. Hostiou

  4. Irstea, UMR Métafort, F-63170, Aubière, France

    N. Hostiou

Authors
  1. N. Hostiou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Hostiou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hostiou, N. Work flexibility of organic suckler sheep farms in France. Org. Agr. 3, 111–121 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-013-0050-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-013-0050-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation