Skip to main content
Log in

Extent and Reproductive Mechanisms of Phragmites australis Spread in Brackish Wetlands in Chesapeake Bay, Maryland (USA)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The number of patches of non-native Phragmites australis in brackish tidal wetlands in the Rhode River subestuary increased from 5 in 1971–72 to 212 in 2007, and the area covered by the patches increased more than 25 times during the same time interval. Genetic analysis of the patches showed that the expansion has primarily been from seed, and genetic similarities between patches indicate that most cross-pollination occurs within a distance of 50 m. Comparison of patches in different parts of the subestuary indicate that the expansion of Phragmites australis has occurred at the scale of the entire subestuary and not the scale of subsections of the subestuary dominated by differing upland land-uses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarez MG, Tron F, Mauchamp A (2005) Sexual versus asexual colonization by Phragmites australis: 25-year reed dynamics in a Mediterranean marsh, southern France. Wetlands 25:639–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balloux F, Lugon-Moulin N (2002) The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers. Molecular Ecology 11:155–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balloux F, Lehmann L, de Meeus T (2003) The population genetics of clonal and partially clonal diploids. Genetics 164:1635–1644

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett SCH, Colautti RI, Eckert CG (2008) Plant reproductive systems and evolution during biological invasion. Molecular Ecology 17:373–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bart D, Hartman JM (2003) The role of large rhizome dispersal and low salinity windows in the establishment of common reed, Phragmites australis, in salt marshes: New links to human activities. Estuaries 26:436–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertness MD, Ewanchuk P, Silliman BR (2002) Anthropogenic modification of New England salt marsh landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99:1395–1398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blum MJ, Bando KJ, Strong DR (2007) Geographic structure, genetic diversity and source tracking of Spartina alterniflora. Journal of Biogeography 34:2055–2069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers RM, Havens KJ, Killeen S, Berman M (2008) Common reed Phragmites australis occurrence and adjacent land use along estuarine shoreline in Chesapeake Bay. Wetlands 28:1097–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clevering OA, Lissner J (1999) Taxonomy, chromosome numbers, clonal diversity and population dynamics of Phragmites australis. Aquatic Botany 64:185–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coops H, Van der Velde G (1995) Seed dispersal, germination and seedling growth of six halophyte species in relation to water-level zonation. Freshwater Biology 34:13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronk JK, Fennessy MS (2001) Wetland plants: biology and ecology. CRC Press/Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Gervais C, Trahan R, Moreno D, Drolet A-M (1993) Le Phragmites australis au Québec: distribution, géographique, nombres chromosomiques et reproduction. Canadian Journal of Botany 71:1386–1393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo W, Wang R, Zhou S, Zhang S, Zhang Z (2003) Genetic diversity and clonal structure of Phragmites australis in the Yellow River delta of China. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 31:1093–1109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halkett F, Simon J-C, Balloux F (2005) Tackling the population genetics of clonal and partially clonal organisms. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20:194–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (1999) Isolation by distance in a continuous population: reconciliation between spatial autocorrelaton analysis and population genetics models. Heredity 83:145–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (2002) SPAGeDi: a versitile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Molecular Ecology Notes 2:618–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam SM (1972) Biological flora of the British Isles. Journal of Ecology 60:585–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudon C, Gagnon P, Jean M (2005) Hydrological factors controlling the spread of common reed (Phragmites australis) in the St. Lawrence River (Québec, Canada). Ecoscience 12:347–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishii J, Kadono Y (2002) Factors influencing seed production of Phragmites australis. Aquatic Botany 72:129–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller BEM (2000) Genetic variation among and within populations of Phragmites australis in the Charles River watershed. Aquatic Botany 66:195–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kettenring KM, McCormick MK, Baron HM, Whigham DF (in press) Phragmites australis (common reed) invasion in the Rhode River subestuary of the Chesapeake Bay: disentangling the effects of foliar nutrients, genetic diversity, patch size, and seed viability. Estuaries and Coasts

  • Kettenring KM, Whigham DF (2009) Seed viability and seed dormancy of Phragmites australis in suburbanized and forested watersheds of the Chesapeake Bay, USA. Aquatic Botany 91:199–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King RS, Deluca WV, Whigham DF, Marra PP (2007) Threshold effects of coastal urbanization on Phragmites australis (Common Reed) abundance and foliar nitrogen in Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries and Coasts 30:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koppitz H (1999) Analysis of genetic diversity among selected populations of Phragmites austalis world-wide. Aquatic Botany 64:209–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert AM, Casagrande RA (2007) Characteristics of a successful estuarine invader: evidence of self-compatibility in native and non-native lineages of Phragmites australis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 337:299–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lelong B, Lavoie C, Jodoin Y, Belzile F (2007) Expansion pathways of the exotic common reed (Phragmites australis): a historical and genetic analysis. Diversity and Distributions 13:430–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks M, Lapin V, Randall J (1994) Phragmites australis (P. communis): Threats, management, and monitoring. Natural Areas Journal 14:285–294

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick J, Somes HA Jr (1982) The coastal wetlands of Maryland. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Coastal Zone Management, Jack McCormick and Associates, Inc., Chevy Chase

  • Minchinton TE (2002) Disturbance by wrack facilitates spread of Phragmites australis in a coastal marsh. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 281:89–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrin D, Hauber DP (1999) Isozyme variation among populations of the clonal spcies, Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. Ex Steudel. Aquatic Botany 63:241–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pollux BJA, Jong MDE, Steegh A, Verbruggen E, van Groenendael JM, Ouborg NJ (2007) Reproductive strategy, clonal structure and genetic diversity in populations of the aquatic macrophyte Sparganium emersum in river systems. Molecular Ecology 16:313–325

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rees GN, Baldwin DS, Watson GO, Perryman S, Nielson DL (2004) Ordination and significance testing of microbial community composition derived from terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms: application of multivariate statistics. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 86:339–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saltonstall K (2002) Cryptic invasion by a non-native genotype of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99:2445–2449

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saltonstall K (2003a) Microsatellite variation within and among North American lineages of Phragmites australis. Molecular Ecology 12:1689–1702

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saltonstall K (2003b) Genetic variation among North American populations of Phragmites australis: implications for management. Estuaries 26:444–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silliman BR, Bertness MD (2004) Shoreline development drives invasion of Phragmites australis and the loss of plant diversity on New England salt marshes. Conservation Biology 18:1424–1434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin M (1995) A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 139:1463

    Google Scholar 

  • Soons MB (2006) Wind dispersal in freshwater wetlands: knowledge for conservation and restoration. Applied Vegetation Science 9:271–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windham L, Ehrenfeld JG (2003) Net impact of a plant invasion on nitrogen-cycling processes within a brackish tidal marsh. Ecological Applications 13:883–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported through a subcontract with Pennsylvania State University on an EPA STAR grant (692105), Denice Wardrop, Principal Investigator, a Smithsonian Postdoctoral Fellowship to KMK, and a Smithsonian Work-learn internship to HMB. Mark Brinson and two anonymous reviewers provided valuable comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melissa K. McCormick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCormick, M.K., Kettenring, K.M., Baron, H.M. et al. Extent and Reproductive Mechanisms of Phragmites australis Spread in Brackish Wetlands in Chesapeake Bay, Maryland (USA). Wetlands 30, 67–74 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-009-0007-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-009-0007-0

Keywords

Navigation