Skip to main content
Log in

e-Health intervention development: a synopsis and comment on “What Design Features are Used in Effective e-Health Interventions? A Review Using Techniques From Critical Interpretive Synthesis”

  • Synopses and Guidelines
  • Published:
Translational Behavioral Medicine

Key question

What design features are included in effective e-Health interventions, and how do these features influence intervention outcomes?

Abstract

In this synopsis and commentary on the Morrison and colleagues article published in Telemedicine and e-Health (18:2, 137–144, 2012), we provide a brief review of effective design features of e-Health interventions as well as a discussion on future directions. The Internet is being used more frequently to deliver health behavior interventions; however, it is unclear which design features contribute to intervention outcomes. Morrison and colleagues conducted a review using critical interpretive synthesis techniques to identify design features that mediate the effects of e-Health intervention outcomes. A total of four design features were identified (social context and support, contacts with intervention, tailoring, and self-management) that may mediate the effect of the intervention on outcomes. This review provides a preliminary conceptual framework to guide future evaluations of the effects of e-Health design features on intervention outcomes. Future research should target optimizing e-Health interventions to determine which design features should be included as well as how they contribute to outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morrison LG, Yardley L, Powell J, et al. What design features are used in effective e-health interventions? A review using techniques from critical interpretive synthesis. Telemed J e-health: Off J Am Telemed Assoc. 2012;18(2):137-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nguyen HQ, Carrieri-Kohlman V, Rankin SH, et al. Internet-based patient education and support interventions: a review of evaluation studies and directions for future research. Comput Biol Med. 2004;34(2):95-112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wantland DJ, Portillo CJ, Holzemer WL, et al. The effectiveness of Web-based vs. non-Web-based interventions: a meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes. J Med Internet Res. 2004;6(4):e40.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Webb TL, Joseph J, Yardley L, et al. Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(1):e4.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Abraham C, Michie S. A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychol: Off J Div Health Psychol Am Psychol Assoc. 2008;27(3):379-87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Green LW, Krueter MV. Health Promotion and Planning: An Educational and Ecological Approach. Mayfield: Mountain View; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kok G, Schaalma H, Ruiter RA, et al. Intervention mapping: protocol for applying health psychology theory to prevention programmes. J Health Psychol. 2004;9(1):85-98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dixon-Woods M, Shaw R, Agarwal S, et al. The problem of appraising qualitative research. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13:223-5. doi:10.1136/qshc.2003.008714.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Collins LM, Murphy SA, Bierman KL. A conceptual framework for adaptive preventive interventions. Prev Sci: Off J Soc Prev Res. 2004;5(3):185-96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nahum-Shani I, Qian M, Almirall D, et al. Experimental design and primary data analysis methods for comparing adaptive interventions. Psychol Methods. 2012;17(4):457-77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Adherence to ethical principles

All procedures, including the informed consent process, were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine A. Pellegrini Ph.D.

Additional information

Implications

Researchers: Researchers should continue to aim to understand which design features contribute to e-Health intervention outcomes.

Practitioners: Practitioners may recommend e-Health interventions, particularly if they include features that facilitate social support, interventionist contact, personalization, and self-management.

Policymakers: Policymakers should consider promoting the use of e-Health interventions that incorporate evidence-based effective design features.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pellegrini, C.A., Steglitz, J. & Hoffman, S.A. e-Health intervention development: a synopsis and comment on “What Design Features are Used in Effective e-Health Interventions? A Review Using Techniques From Critical Interpretive Synthesis”. Behav. Med. Pract. Policy Res. 4, 342–345 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-014-0283-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-014-0283-y

Keywords

Navigation