Date: 21 Aug 2012
Dear Doc: advice for collaborators
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Years ago, when Doc was a junior faculty member she became aware of a situation that changed her life. An extremely well-known senior scientist in her department took the data of a graduate student and published it in a very significant, oft-cited paper without crediting the student in any way. That this action had the tacit approval of the department chair was confusing. Dismayed by this violation of trust and feeling powerless to intervene, she decided to become the Dear Abby of Science. Working in the lab during the day she was becoming a world-renowned researcher as well as a highly revered mentor to younger scientists. At night, disguised as Dr. Doc she began advising other researchers who were looking for help with their sticky situations. As word of mouth spread about Doc more and more researchers sought out her advice about a wide range of problems in their labs and in their collaborations. She is currently entertaining a proposal from a collaborative group of editors from high-impact journals to develop a web presence that would offer insightful advice to struggling scientific collaborators around the world. The following is a selection of letters from Doc’s files focused on collaboration. The names and details in the letters have been changed to protect confidentiality.
Researchers: Attending to trust, vision and setting expectations will enable a collaborative team to focus more on the science and less on conflict
Practitioners: Establishing collaborative and pre-tenure agreements provides a scaffold for interpersonal and organizational trust
Policymakers: Institutional messages and communications must align with review and reward structure
Bennett LM, Gadlin H, Levine-Finley S. Team science and collaboration: a field guide. In: DHHS, ed. Bethesda; 2010.
Berndt AE. Developing collaborative research agreements. J Emerg Nurs. 2011;37(5):497-498.PubMed
Bennett LM, Gadlin H. Collaboration and team science: from theory to practice. J Investig Med. 2012;60(5):768-775.PubMed
Lewicki RJ. Trust and Distrust. In: Schneider AK, Honeyman C, eds. The negotiator's fieldbook. Washington, DC: American Bar Association; 2006.
Thomas KW, Killman R. Thomas–Kilmann conflict mode instrument. CPP; 2002.
French JJ, Raven B. The Bases of Social Power. In: Cartwright D, ed. Studies in social power. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press; 1959.
Hill L. Power dynamics in organizations. Harv Bus Sch Note. 1994;9-494-083:1-13.
Nobelprize.org. Daneil Kahneman—Autobiography. 2002; http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/2002/kahneman.html. Accessed September 26, 2011.
Bennett L, Gadlin H. Tenure track offer template. 2011; http://teamscience.nih.gov. Accessed May 18, 2012.
O'Connell D, Hickerson K, Pillutla A. Organizational visioning: an integrative review. Group Organ Manag. 2011;36:102-125.CrossRef
Ang S, Van Dyne L. Handbook of cultural intelligence: theory measurement and application. Armonk, NY: Sharpe; 2008.
Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ, Minkov M. Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. McGraw-Hill; 2010.
Hofstede G. Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organization as across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2001.
- Dear Doc: advice for collaborators
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Volume 2, Issue 4 , pp 495-503
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Team science
- Collaborative agreement
- Pretenure agreement
- Managing conflict
- Promoting disagreement