ABSTRACT
Over one-third of patients treated in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) are obese. VHA introduced the MOVE! Weight Management Program for Veterans in 2006 to provide comprehensive weight management services. An evolving, periodic evaluation using the RE-AIM framework (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) has been conducted to gauge success and opportunities for improvement. Key metrics were identified in each RE-AIM dimension. Data were compiled over fiscal years (FY) 2006 through 2010 from a variety of sources including VHA administrative and clinical databases, electronic medical record reviews, and an annual, structured VHA facility self-report. REACH: Screening for obesity and offering weight management treatment to eligible patients increased from 66% to 95% over the past 3 years. MOVE! is currently provided at every VHA hospital facility and at over one-half of VHA community-based outpatient clinics. The percent of eligible patients who participate in at least one weight management visit has doubled since implementation began but has stabilized at 10 to 12%. EFFECTIVENESS: About 18.6% of the 31,854 patients with available weight data who participated in at least two treatment visits between Jul 1, 2008 and Sep 30, 2009 had at least a 5% body weight loss by 6 months as did almost one-third of those who participated in more intense and sustained treatment. By contrast, only 12.5% of a comparison group of patients matched on age, gender, body mass index (BMI) class, and comorbidity status who were not treated with MOVE! had at least a 5% body weight loss. ADOPTION: The median full-time staff equivalent providing weight management services at each facility has increased over time and was 1.76 in FY 2010. IMPLEMENTATION: Staff from multiple disciplines typically provide MOVE!-related care although not all disciplines are involved with providing care at every facility. Group-based treatment has become increasingly utilized, and in FY 2010 it represented 72% of all MOVE!-related visits. Intensity of treatment has increased from an average of 3.6 visits per patient per year in FY 2007 to 4.6 in FY 2010, but more than half of patients have two visits or less. Almost all facilities now report the consistent use of key evidence-based behavioral strategies with patients. MAINTENANCE: While participation in MOVE! by patients continues to grow each year, facility self-reported program staffing and space/equipment challenges are potential barriers to long-term program maintenance. Evidence-based weight management treatment can be delivered at VHA medical centers and community-based outpatient clinics, but the REACH remains limited after several years of implementation. Intense and sustained treatment with MOVE! results in a modest positive impact on short-term weight loss outcomes, but a relatively small proportion of patients engage in this level of care. Increasing reach, improving effectiveness of care, and keeping patients engaged in treatment are areas for future policy, practice, and research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Das, S. R., Kinsinger, L. S., Yancy, W. S., Jr., Wang, A., Ciesco, E., Burdick, M., et al. (2005). Obesity prevalence among veterans at Veterans Affairs medical facilities. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(3), 291–294.
Wang, A., Kinsinger, L. S., Kahwati, L. C., Das, S. R., Gizlice, Z., Harvey, R. T., et al. (2005). Obesity and weight control practices in 2000 among veterans using VA facilities. Obesity Research, 13(8), 1405–1411.
Nelson, K. M. (2006). The burden of obesity among a national probability sample of veterans. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21(9), 915–919.
Almond, N., Kahwati, L., Kinsinger, L., & Porterfield, D. (2008). Prevalence of overweight and obesity among U.S. military veterans. Military Medicine, 173(6), 544–549.
Noel, P. H., Copeland, L. A., Pugh, M. J., Kahwati, L., Tsevat, J., Nelson, K., et al. (2010). Obesity diagnosis and care practices in the Veterans Health Administration. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25(6), 510–516.
Department of Veterans Affairs. Organizational briefing book. Department of Veterans Affairs; 2010 [11/25/2010]; Available from: http://www4.va.gov/ofcadmin/docs/vaorgbb.pdf.
Kinsinger, L. S., Jones, K. R., Kahwati, L., Harvey, R., Burdick, M., Zele, V., et al. (2009). Design and dissemination of the MOVE! Weight-Management Program for Veterans. Preventing Chronic Disease, 6(3), A98.
Veterans Health Administration. VHA handboook 1101.1 Managing Overweight and/or Obesity For Veterans Everywhere (MOVE!) Program. Veterans Health Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs; 2006; Available from: http://www1.va.gov/vhapublications/ViewPublication.asp?pub_ID=1396.
National Institutes of Health. (1998). Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults—the evidence report. Obesity Research, 6(Suppl 2), 51S–209S.
US Preventive Services Task Force. (2003). Screening for obesity in adults: recommendations and rationale. Annals of Internal Medicine, 139(11), 930–932.
McTigue, K. M., Harris, R., Hemphill, B., Lux, L., Sutton, S., Bunton, A. J., et al. (2003). Screening and interventions for obesity in adults: summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Annals of Internal Medicine, 139(11), 933–949.
Veterans Health Administration and United States Army MEDCOM. VA/DoD clinical practice guideline for screening and management of overweight and obesity. Veterans Health Administration and United States Army Medical Command; 2006; Available from: http://www.healthquality.va.gov/Obesity_Clinical_Practice_Guideline.asp.
Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Lifestyle manuals of operations. 1996 [10/26/2010]; Available from: http://www.bsc.gwu.edu/dpp/manuals.htmlvdoc.
Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M., & Boles, S. M. (1999). Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. American Journal of Public Health, 89(9), 1322–1327.
Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2005). Realist review—a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(Suppl 1), 21–34.
Pronk, N. (2005). Worksite health promotion: the four faces of measurement. ACSM's Health & Fitness Journal, 9(5), 34–36.
Maciejewski, M. L., Liu, C. F., Derleth, A., McDonell, M., Anderson, S., & Fihn, S. D. (2005). The performance of administrative and self-reported measures for risk adjustment of Veterans Affairs expenditures. Health Services Research, 40(3), 887–904.
Fan, V. S., Maciejewski, M. L., Liu, C. F., McDonnell, M., & Fihn, S. D. (2006). Comparison of risk adjustment measures based on self-report, administrative data, and pharmacy records to predict clniical outcomes. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol, 6(1–2), 21–36.
West, A. N., Lee, R. E., Shambaugh-Miller, M. D., Bair, B. D., Mueller, K. J., Lilly, R. S., et al. (2010). Defining "rural" for veterans' health care planning. The Journal of Rural Health, 26(4), 301–309.
Kahwati L, Lewis M, Kane H, Williams-Piehota P, Nerz P, Jones K, et al. Best practices in the Veterans Health Administration’s MOVE! Weight Management Program. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(5):in press.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge Dr. Megan Lewis, Dr. Pam Spain, and Mr. Harper Gordek from RTI International for the work they contributed through a contract with VHA to generate many of the effectiveness outcomes presented in this paper. The authors acknowledge Dr. Michael Goldstein and Dr. Margaret Dundon of the VHA National Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention for their careful review and comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
Drs. Kahwati, Jones and Kinsinger and Ms. Lance are employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).
Disclaimer
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Implications
Practice: Weight management treatment can be delivered at VHA medical centers and community-based outpatient clinics with modest but positive impact on short-term weight loss outcomes. Intensity and span of treatment are key drivers of clinical success.
Policy: Policies for weight management within integrated health systems should include both clinical and administrative components to ensure an infrastructure upon which evidence-based weight management can be provided.
Research: Increasing reach, improving effectiveness of care, and keeping patients engaged in treatment through new modalities of care and better linkage with primary care teams are areas for future research.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(doc 145 kb)
About this article
Cite this article
Kahwati, L.C., Lance, T.X., Jones, K.R. et al. RE-AIM evaluation of the Veterans Health Administration’s MOVE! Weight Management Program. Behav. Med. Pract. Policy Res. 1, 551–560 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-011-0077-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-011-0077-4