Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Study of Contingency Factors of Accounting Information System Design in Tunisian SMIs

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims at identifying the factors that influence the design of the accounting information system in the Tunisian small and medium industries (SMIs) through the characteristics of information, accounting management tools, and degree of formalism. The accounting information system is considered to be a key factor of competitiveness of companies. It provides managers with the relevant accounting information to help them with the decision making. Through a set of structural and behavioral factors, we tried to improve the understanding of the accounting information system in the developing countries, using Tunisia as an example. Based on a technical questionnaire, a total of 221 Tunisian companies operating exclusively in the industrial sector were studied. By using the PLS structural equation modeling, we showed that the design of accounting information system is influenced by several factors of contingency. When we looked at structural contingency, we found a positive and significant effect of the firm’s size on the degree of formalism. In addition, a positive and significant effect of the organizational structure on the characteristics of the accounting information systems was shown. Furthermore, the examination of the behavioral contingency showed that the manager’s profile affects in part the use of accounting management tools. In conclusion, our study extends the accounting information system literature and helps managers to have a framework to enhance the performance of their industries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The database has been used is of the Tunisian Agency for the Promotion of Industry and Innovation (API) (www.tunisieindustrie.nat.tn) to identify this population of 5731 companies.

  2. The questionnaire has been mailed by the same interviewer. There are no difference between earlier and late interview to reveal biases.

  3. Significance level of 10%

  4. Significance level of 10%

References

  • Abdel Kader, M., & Luther, R. (2008). The impact of firm characteristics on management accounting practices: a UK based empirical analysis. Br Account Rev, 40(1), 2–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Affes, H., & Chabchoub, A. (2007). Le système d’information comptable : les déterminants de ses caractéristiques et son impact sur la performance financière des PME en Tunisie. La Revue des Sciences de Gestion, Direction et Gestion, 224-225, 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Omri, M., & Drury, C. (2007). A survey of factors influencing the choice of product costing systems in UK organizations. Manag Account Res, 18(4), 399–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baines, A., & Langfield-Smith, K. (2003). Antecedents to management accounting change: a structural equation approach. Acc Organ Soc, 28(7–8), 675–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bajan-Banaszak, G. (1993). L’expert-comptable et le conseil en gestion, Revue Française de Comptabilité, n° 249, 95–101.

  • Ben Hamadi, Z.,& Chapellier, P. (2010). Le système de données comptables des dirigeants de PME tunisiennes: Facteurs de contingence et impact sur la performance financière. Management International.

  • Ben Hamadi, Z., Bonache, A.B., Chapellier, P. & Mohammed, A. (2011). Les déterminants de la complexité des systèmes de données comptables des dirigeants de petites et moyennes entreprises : Une méta-analyse sur données individuelles, Hal.archives ouvertes.fr/docs/00/64/65/18/PDF/Ben_Hamadi.pdf.

  • Ben Hamadi, Z., Chapellier, P. & Villeseque-Dubus, F. (2014). Innovations budgétaires en PME : l’influence du secteur d’activité et du profil du dirigeant, Innovations, p 223–252.

  • Begon, G. (1990). Le système d’information de synthèse dans les PME : Un marché. Mémoire d’expertise comptable, 98 p. + annexes.

  • Berland, N., & De Rongé, Y. (2013). Contrôle de gestion. France: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, O. (2010). Système de contrôle de gestion et trajectoire du propriétaire-dirigeant de petite entreprise : Le secteur de l’agencement d’intérieur dans le Grand-Est. Thèse de Doctorat en sciences de gestion, Université Paris-Est - Marne la Vallée.

  • Bonache, A. B., Chapellier, P., Ben Hamadi, Z., & Mohammed, A. (2015). Les déterminants de la complexité des systèmes d’information comptables des dirigeants de PME : contingences culturelles et endogénéité. Manag Int, 19(3), 148–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boubakri, W. B., Zghidi, A. B. Y., & Zaiem, I. (2013). The effect of export stimuli on export performance: the case of the Tunisian industrial firms. International Review of Management and Business Research, 2(1), 155–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boujelbene, M. A., & Affes, H. (2015). Impact of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between budgetary participation and managerial performance and job satisfaction: some Tunisian evidence. International Journal of Accounting and Finance, 5(1), 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T. E., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.

  • Chang, R. D., Chang, Y. W., & Paper, D. (2003). The effect of task uncertainty, decentralization and AIS characteristics on the performance of AIS: an empirical case in Taiwan. Information and Management, 40(4), 691–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapellier, P. (1994). Comptabilités et systèmes d’information du dirigeant de PME : essai d’observation et d’interprétation des pratiques. Doctorat en sciences de gestion, Montpellier: Université de Montpellier II.

  • Chapellier, P. (2011). Vers un modèle de gestion hybride pour le dirigeant de PME : Une étude de la triangulation entre système d’information formel, recours à l’expert et mètis du dirigeant. Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches – Université de Nice Sophia Antipolis.

  • Chapellier, P., & Ben Hamadi, Z. (2012). Le système de données comptables des dirigeants de PME tunisiennes: complexité et déterminants. Manag Int, 16(4), 151–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapellier, P. & Mohammed, A. (2010). Les pratiques comptables des dirigeants de PME Syriennes dans un contexte de libéralisation de l’économie. 31ème Congrès de l’Association Francophone de Comptabilité (AFC), Nice.

  • Chapellier, P., Mohammed, A., & Teller, R. (2013). Le système d’information comptable des dirigeants de PME syriennes : complexité et contingences. Management & Avenir, 65(7), 48. doi:10.3917/mav.065.0048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within organisational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organisation and Society, 28, 127–168. doi:10.1108/18347641011023270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chenhall, R. H., & Morris, D. (1986). The impact of structure, environment, and interdependence on the perceived usefulness of management accounting systems. Account Rev, 61(1), 16–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chenhall, R. H., & Langfield-Smith, K. (1998). The relationship between strategic priorities, management techniques and management accounting: an empirical investigation using a systems approach. Acc Organ Soc, 23(3), 243–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chia, Y. M. (1995). Decentralization, management accounting systems (MAS) information characteristics and their interaction effects on managerial performance: a Singapore study. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 22(6), 811–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choe, J. M. (1998). The effects of user participation on the design of accounting information systems. Information and Management, 34(3), 185–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, V. K., & Chong, K. M. (1997). Strategic choices, environmental uncertainty and SBU performance: a note on the intervening role of management accounting systems. Account Bus Res, 27(4), 268–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christ, L. K. & Burritt, R. L. (2013). Environmental management accounting: the significance of contingent variables for adoption. J Clean Prod, 41, 163–173 (online). Available: http://elsevier.com/locate/jelepro.

  • Condor, R. (2012). Le contrôle de gestion dans les PME : une approche par la taille et le cycle de vie. Revue internationale P.M.E. Economie et gestion de la petite et moyenne entreprise, 25(2), 77–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coupal, M. (1994). Les PME, copie conforme de son fondateur. Revue Organisation, 3(1), 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Manag Sci, 32(5), 554–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L., & Macintosh, N. B. (1981). A tentative exploration into the amount and equivocality of information processing in organizational work units. Adm Sci Q, 26, 207–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davila, T. (2005). An exploratory study on the emergence of management control systems: formalizing human resources in small growing firms. Acc Organ Soc, 30(3), 223–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davila, A., Epstein, M.J. & Manzoni, J.F.(2012). Performance Measurement and Management Control: Global Issues.Emerald Books, Studies in Managerial and financial accounting, 25.

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res, 48, 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerdin, J. (2005). Management accounting system design in manufacturing departments: an empirical investigation using a multiple contingencies approach. Accounting, Organization and Society, 30(2), 99–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germain, C. (2000). Contrôle organisationnel et contrôle de gestion : la place des tableaux de bord dans le système de contrôle des petites et moyennes entreprises. Thèse de doctorat en sciences de gestion, Bordeaux, Université Montesquieu- Bordeaux IV.

  • Gordon, L. A., & Narayanan, V. K. (1984). Management accounting systems, perceived environment uncertainty and organization structure: an empirical investigation. Accounting Organizations and Society, 9(1), 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V. (1984). Appropriateness of accounting data in performance evaluation: an empirical examination of environmental uncertainty as an intervening variable. Acc Organ Soc, 9(2), 125–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiner, L. E. (1972). Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harv Bus Rev, 76(3), 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gul, F. A. (1991). The effects of management accounting systems and environmental uncertainty on small business managers’ performance. Account Bus Res, 22(85), 57–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hage, J., & Aiken, M. (1969). Routine technology, social structure, and organization goals. Adm Sci Q, 14(3), 366–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage ISBN 9781452217444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldma, T., & Lääts, K. (2002). Contingencies influencing the management accounting practices of Estonian manufacturing companies. Manag Account Res, 13(4), 379–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammad, S. A., Jusoh, R., & Ghozali, I. (2013). Decentralization, perceived environmental uncertainty, managerial performance and management accounting system information in Egyptian hospital. Int J Account Inf Manag, 21(4), 314–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, S., & Nicholls, D. (1989). Modelling the accounting information requirement of small business. Account Bus Res, 19(74), 143–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jänkälä, S. (2007). Management control systems (MCS) in the small business context : Linking effects of contextual factors with MCS and financial performance of small firms. http://herkules.oulu.fi/isbn9789514285288.

  • Kalika, M. (1987). Structures d’entreprises, réalités, déterminants, performances. Economica

  • Kossaï, M., & Piget, P. (2014). Adoption of information and communication technology and firm profitability: empirical evidence from Tunisian SMEs. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 25(1), 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacombe-Saboly, M. (1994). Les déterminants de la qualité des produits comptables des entreprises : Le rôle du dirigeant. Thèse de Sciences de Gestion, Université de Poitiers.

  • Lassoued, K. & Abdelmoula, I. (2006). Les déterminants des systèmes d’information comptables dans les PME: une recherche empirique dans le contexte tunisien. 27ème Congrès de l’Association Francophone de Comptabilité (AFC), Tunis.

  • Lavigne, B. (1999). Contribution à l’étude de la genèse des états financiers des PME. Thèse de Sciences de Gestion - Université Paris Dauphine.

  • Lavigne B. (2002). Contribution à l’étude de la genèse des états financiers des PME, Comptabilité, Contrôle, Audit, Tome 8, Vol. 1, mai, 25–44.

  • Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Adm Sci Q, 12(1), 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, E. (1991). Profil distinctif des dirigeants de PME innovatrices. Revue internationale PME, 4(3), 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lisi, I. E. (2016). Determinants and performance effects of social performance measurement systems. J Bus Ethics, 38, 1–27. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3287-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manteghi, N., & Jahromi, S. K. (2012). Designing accounting information system using SSADM1 case study: south fars power generation management company (SFPGMC). Procedia Technology, 1, 308–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, K. A. (1981). The design of the corporate budgeting system: influences on managerial behavior and performance. Account Rev, 4, 813–829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, K. A. (1984). Influences on departmental budgeting: an empirical examination of a contingency model. Acc Organ Soc, 9(3), 291–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, K. A., & Van der Stede, W. A. (2011). Management control systems: performance measurement, evaluation and incentives. Harlow, UK: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1982). Structure et dynamique des organisations. Paris: Les Editions d’Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G. W. (1987). Information needs of female entrepreneurs. J Small Bus Manag, 25, 38–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngongang, D. (2007). Analyse des facteurs déterminants du système d’information comptable et des pratiques comptables des PME tchadiennes. La Revue des Sciences de Gestion, Direction et Gestion, 224-225, 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngongang, D. (2010). Analyse de la pratique des coûts dans les PMI camerounaises. Revue Libanaise de Gestion et d’Économie, 3(5), 92–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngongang, D. (2013). Système d’information comptable et contrôle de gestion dans les entreprises camerounaises. La Revue Gestion et Organisation, 5(2), 113–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobre, T. (2001). Méthodes et outils de contrôle de gestion dans les PME. Finance –Contrôle– Stratégie, 4(2), 119–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otley, D. (1980). The contingency theory and management accounting: achievement and prognosis. Acc Organ Soc, 5(4), 413–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post, J., & Epstein, M. J. (1977). Information systems for societal reporting. Acad Manag Rev, 2(1), 81–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramli, I., & Iskandar, D. (2014). Control authority, business strategy, and the characteristics of management accounting information systems. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164, 384–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, G. C., & Smith, J. A. (2000). The impact of contingencies on management accounting system development. Manag Account Res, 11(4), 427–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reix, R. (1984). Quelques facteurs affectant l’utilisation d’informations de caractère comptable. Actes du congrès de l’Association Française de Comptabilité, Nice.

  • Saganuwan, M. U., Ismail, W. K. W., & Ahmad, U. N. U. (2013). Technostress: mediating accounting information system performance. Information Management and Business Review, 5(6), 270–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santin, S. & Van Caillie, D. (2008). Le design du système de contrôle de gestion des PME : Une quête de stabilité adaptative. 29ème Congrès annuel de l’Association Francophone de Comptabilité, Paris.

  • Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business—a skill building approach (4th ed.). USA: John Wiley and Sons, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisaye, S., & Birnberg, J. (2010). Extent and scope of diffusion and adoption of process innovations in management accounting systems. Int J Account Inf Manag, 18(2), 118–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sori, Z. M. (2009). Accounting information systems (AIS) and knowledge management: a case study. American Journal of Scientific Research, 4, 36–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soudani, S. N. (2012). The usefulness of an accounting information system for effective organizational performance. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(5), 136–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stepniewski, J., Souid, S. & Azzabi, L. (2008). La relation facteurs de contingence, complexité du système d’information comptable et performance financière. www.scribd.com/doc/51654351/La-relation-facteurs-de-contingence. Accessed 06/11/2010.

  • Vallerand, J., Morrill, J. & Berthelot, S. (2008). Positionnement de la PME manufacturière canadienne face aux outils de gestion enseignés dans les programmes de formation universitaire en administration. 9ème Congrès International Francophone sur l’Entrepreneuriatet les PME, Louvain-la-neuve.

  • Zghidi, A.B.Y. & Zaiem, I. (2011). Stratégie d’adaptation du produit et performance à l’export : Effets du secteur d’activité et des caractéristiques internes de l’entreprise. 20ème Conférence d’AIMS, Nantes.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. HEC Management School, University of Liège-Belgium, Liège, Belgium

    Jihene Ghorbel

  2. Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Sfax-Tunisia, Sfax, Tunisia

    Jihene Ghorbel

Authors
  1. Jihene Ghorbel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jihene Ghorbel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghorbel, J. A Study of Contingency Factors of Accounting Information System Design in Tunisian SMIs. J Knowl Econ 10, 74–103 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0439-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0439-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation