Skip to main content
Log in

Prior Experience and Co-opetition in R&D Programs

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Past managerial literature found that prior experience of organisations is an important factor affecting somehow their willingness in participating to a R&D consortium. Our research extends this body of knowledge in two directions: (1) by investigating how prior experience affects the choices of organisations coordinating project proposals for R&D programs (the so-called “coordinators”) in terms of composition of their R&D consortia, and (2) by analysing how prior experience affects co-opetition between project coordinators. The assumption of the study is that organisations coordinating and forming R&D consortia for R&D programs usually engage in co-opetitive relationships with each other. Therefore, the research question of the paper is, “how does prior experience affect the coordinators’ choices about the formation of their inter-organisational consortia within a R&D program?” We analysed 2.895 R&D projects of inter-organisational consortia which received funds by the European Union under more Framework Programmes in order to implement R&D projects for the aerospace industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Absorptive capacity is the “firm’s ability to value, assimilate and apply new knowledge towards commercial ends”. The other key condition is the intensity of effort (Cohen and Levinthal 1990).

  2. Open innovation is “the use of purposive inflows and outflows of knowledge to accelerate internal innovation, and expand the markets for external use of innovation, respectively”(Chesbrough et al. p. 1 2006).

  3. By experienced coordinators we considered organizations belonging to the first decile of the ranking based on the number of projects coordinated at time t-1.

References

  • Arranz, N., & Fernandez de Arroyabe, J. C. (2007). Governance structures in R&D networks: An analysis in the European context. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 74(5), 645–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autant-Bernard, C., Billand, P., Frachisse, D., & Massard, N. (2007). Social distance versus spatial distance in R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from European collaboration choices in micro and nanotechnologies”. Papers in Regional Science, 86, 495–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barajas, A., & Huergo, E. (2010). International R&D cooperation within the EU Framework Programme: empirical evidence for Spanish firms”. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19(1), 87–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1996). Co-opetition. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breschi, S., & Cusmano, L. (2004). Unveiling the texture of a European research area: Emergence of oligarchic networks under EU Framework Programmes. International Journal of Technology Management. Special Issue on Technology Alliances, 27(8), 747–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busom, I., & Fernández-Ribas, A. (2008). The impact of firm participation in R&D programmes on R&D partnerships. Research Policy, 37, 240–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caloghirou, Y., Vonortas, N. S., & Ioannides, S. (Eds.). (2004). European Collaboration in Research and Development. UK: Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassiman, B., Di Guardo, M. C., & Valentini, G. (2009). Organising R&D projects to profit from innovation: Insights from co-opetition. Long Range Planning, 42(2), 216–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2006). Open Innovation. Researching a New Paradigm. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. L., Olk, P. M., & Ring, P. S. (2000). Formation processes of R&D consortia: Which path to take: Where does it lead? Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 239–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gnyawali, D. R., & Madhavan, R. (2001). Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: A structural embeddedness perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 431–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnyawali, D. R., & Park R. (2011). Co-opetition between Giants: Collaboration between competitors for technological innovation. Forthcoming in Research Policy.

  • Hagedoorn, J. (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14(5), 371–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J., Roijakkers, N., & Van Kranenburg, H. (2006). Inter-firm R&D networks: the importance of strategic network capabilities for high-tech partnership formation. British Journal of Management, 17, 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernán, R., Marín, P. L., & Siotis, G. (2003). An empirical evaluation of the determinants of research joint venture formation. The Journal of Industrial Economics, LI(1), 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhok, A. (2000). Transaction (In)efficiency, value (In)Efficiency and inter-firm collaboration. In D. Faulkner & M. de Rond (Eds.), Cooperative strategy: Economic, business, and organizational issues. UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miotti, L., & Sachwald, F. (2003). Cooperative R&D: Why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy, 32, 1481–1499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Nishiguchi, T. (Eds.). (2001). Knowledge emergence: social, technical, and evolutionary dimensions of knowledge creation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padula, G., & Dagnino, G. B. (2008). Untangling the rise of co-opetition: the intrusion of competition in a cooperative game structure. International Studies of Management and Organization, 37(2), 32–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paier, M., & Scherngell, T. (2008). “Determinants of collaboration in European R&D networks: Empirical evidence from a discrete choice model”, 12th International Conference of the International Schumpeter Society, July, 2nd - 5th. Rio de Janeiro: CD-ROM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakakibara, M. (1998). Heterogeneity of firm capabilities and cooperative research and development: an empirical examination of motives. Strategic Management Journal, 18(1), 143–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakakibara, M. (2002). Formation of R&D consortia: Industry and company effects. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11), 1033–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. C. (2005). Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 1009–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiavone, F., & Simoni, M. (2011). An experience-based view of Co-opetition in R&D networks. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(n. 2).

  • Schmiele, A., & Sofka, W. (2007). Internationalizing R&D Co-opetition: Dress for the dance with the devil. ZEW Discussion Paper. 07-045.

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

No conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Schiavone.

Additional information

Although the paper reports the common ideas of both the authors, Francesco Schiavone wrote sections: 1, 2, 3. Michele Simoni wrote sections 4, 5, 6.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schiavone, F., Simoni, M. Prior Experience and Co-opetition in R&D Programs. J Knowl Econ 7, 819–835 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0251-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0251-x

Keywords

Navigation