Abstract
The relationship between breakthrough and incremental innovation remains one of the more important issues in innovation theory and in national innovation policy. Using a comparative historical approach, in this paper, we analyze the rise and fall of Germany as a science and innovation leader of the early part of the twentieth century and its transformation from a breakthrough to an incremental innovator after 1945. We find that Germany was an important early precursor and successful practitioner of such contemporary concepts as national innovation systems, the triple (quadruple) helix, and university–business collaboration well before they became regarded as best practice only after 1980. We then pose the question of why modern Germany, in spite of its economic success, was not able to restore its preeminence in science and breakthrough innovations limiting its performance to incremental innovation in selected traditional industries. In our conclusions, we propose to draw important lessons from the successes and failures of Germany for countries that aspire to innovation leadership today. We argue that although many conditions have changed, key rules of maintaining breakthrough innovation leadership remain valid.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, J., & Pendlebury, D. (2010). Global research report: United States. Thomson-Reuters ScienceWatch. http://sciencewatch.com/sites/sw/files/sw-article/media/globalresearchreport-usa.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2013.
Battelle and R&D Magazine (2012). 2013 Global R&D funding forecast. http://www.rdmag.com/digital-editions/2012/12/2013-r-d-magazine-global-funding-forecast. Accessed 11 July 2013.
Baumol, W. J. (2004). Education for innovation: entrepreneurial breakthroughs vs. corporate incremental improvements. NBER Working Paper 10578. http://www.nber.org/papers/w10578. Accessed 2 Dec 2013.
Bhattacharya, N. (2012). The evolution of knowledge in the university. The Information Society, 28, 208–227.
Cahan, D. (1989). An institute for an empire: the Physikalisch-Technische Reichsanstalt, 1871–1918. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carayannis, E., & Campbell, D. (2010). Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other?: A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41–69.
Casumano, M. (1985). The Japanese automobile industry: technology & management at Nissan & Toyota. Cambridge: Harvard University Asia Center.
Comin, D. A., Trumbull, J. G., & Yang, K. (2011). Fraunhofer: innovation in Germany, HBS Case 711-022. Cambridge: Harvard Business School.
Cornwell, J. (2003). Hitler’s scientists. New York: Penguin.
Dunlap-Hinkler, D., Kotabe, M., & Mudambi, R. (2010). A story of breakthrough versus incremental innovation: corporate entrepreneurship in the global pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(2), 106–127.
Dodgson, M., Gann, D., & Salter, A. (2008). The management of technological innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
European Commission (2011). Innovation union scoreboard 2010. http://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/iu-scoreboard-2010_en.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2013.
EFI, Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation (2011). Research, innovation and technological performance in Germany. http://www.e-fi.de/fileadmin/EFI_2011_en_final.pdf. Accessed 11 July 2013.
INSEAD and WIPO (2012). Global Innovation Index 2012: stronger innovation linkages for global growth. http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/freepublications/en/economics/gii/gii_2012.pdf. Accessed 11 July 2013.
Jacobi, H.F. (2011). German innovation. Presentation at the Fraunhofer Institute, Munich.
Kobayashi, S., & Okubo, Y. (2004). Demand articulation, a key factor in the reconfiguration of the present Japanese science and technology system. Science and Public Policy, 31(1), 55–67.
Koizumi, K. (2008). Historical trends in federal R&D. In AAAS Report XXXIII: Research and Development FY 2009 (pp. 21-26). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science
Levin, R. C. (2010). Top of the class: the rise of Asia’s universities. Foreign Affairs, 89(3), 63–75.
McClelland, C.E. (1980). State, society, and university in Germany 1700–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nobel Foundation (2013). Nobel prizes and laureates. http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/. Accessed 26 July 2013.
OECD (2007). OECD science, technology and industry scorecard 2007. http://www.oecd.org/science/inno/oecdsciencetechnologyandindustryscoreboard2007.htm. Accessed 11 July 2013.
OECD (2011). OECD science, technology and industry scorecard 2011. http://www.oecd.org/innovation/inno/oecdsciencetechnologyandindustryscoreboard2011innovationandgrowthinknowledgeeconomies.htm. Accessed 11 July 2013.
OECD (2012). OECD science, technology and industry outlook 2012. http://www.keepeek.com/oecd/media/science-and-technology/oecd-science-technology-and-industry-outlook-2012_sti_outlook-2012-en. Accessed 11 July 2013.
OECD (2013). Indicators of international cooperation. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/data/oecd-patent-statistics_patent-data-en. Accessed 11 July 2013.
Pinkwart, A. (2012). The new role of universities in the twenty-first century: universities as engines of innovation and entrepreneurial hubs. Washington, DC: American Institute for Contemporary German Studies.
Reiss, T., Hinze, S., & Dominguez Lacasa, I. (2004). Performance of European member states in biotechnology. Science and Public Policy, 31(5), 344–388.
Shanghai Ranking Consultancy (2012). Academic ranking of world universities. http://www.shanghairanking.com/index.html. Accessed 11 July 2013.
Stifterverband (2008). FuE-facts: Industrieforschung und Konjunktur im Gleichschritt. http://www.stifterverband.info/publikationen_und_podcasts/wissenschaftsstatistik/index.html. Accessed 26 July 2013.
Strachan, H. (2004). The outbreak of the First World War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thomson Reuters (2011). Top 20 countries in all fields, 2001-August 31, 2011. http://archive.sciencewatch.com/dr/cou/2011/11decALL/. Accessed 11 July 2013.
Tuchman, B. (1995). The proud tower. London: Folio Society.
Turner, R. S. (1974). University reformers and professorial scholarship in Germany, 1760-1806. In L. Stone (Ed.), The university in society (Vol. 2, pp. 495–532). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
US News and World Report (2012). World’s best universities: subject rankings. http://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings-articles/university-subject-rankings. Accessed 11 July 2013.
VFA (Association of Research Based Pharmaceutical Companies) (2011). The pharmaceutical market. http://www.vfa.de. Accessed 2011.
Watson, P. (2010). The German genius: Europe’s Third Renaissance, the second scientific revolution, and the twentieth century. London: Simon and Shuster.
Williams, E. E. (1896). Made in Germany. London: Heinemman.
Zimmerman, D. (1996). Top secret exchange: the Tizard Mission and the scientific war. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Acknowledgments
I want to acknowledge that parts of this model are borrowed from a presentation made by J. Liberkowski at the 2012, Vail conference in Wroclaw, Poland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mroczkowski, T. From Breakthrough to Incremental Innovation Leadership: Lessons from Germany. J Knowl Econ 5, 409–426 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0184-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0184-9