Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Structural Differentiation and Its Implications—Core/Periphery Structure of the Technological Network

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By applying a network analytical approach, this paper examines the position of technological network in shaping the contribution of a technology in technological development. Between the core and the periphery of the technological network structure, we argue that technologies which occupy a core position of network are in propensity for exploitation in succeeding or derivative technologies. On the contrary, technologies located in periphery position of network are likely to lead to seminal technologies. We empirically test the patent data of insurance business methods and discuss the technological implications of the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Borgatti and Everett [2] UCINET 6 for Windows software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA, Analytic Technologies.

References

  1. Baum JAC, Ingram P (2002) Interorganizational learning and network organization: toward a behavioral theory of the interfirm. In: Augier M, March JG (eds) The Economics of Choice, Change and Organization: Essays in Memory of Richard M. Cyert. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp 191–218

    Google Scholar 

  2. Borgatti SP, Everett MG (1999) Models of core/periphery structures. Soc Netw 21:375–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Breschi, S. Lissoni, F (2005) Knowledge networks from patent data: methodological issues and research targets, in Henk F. Moed, Wolfgang Glänzel and Ulrich Schmoch (Eds.). Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, the Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems. Springer, The Netherlands, 613–643

  4. Calero C, van Leeuwen TN, Tijssen RJW (2007) Research cooperation within the bio-pharmaceutical industry: network analyses of copublications within and between firms. Scientometrics 71:87–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cantner U, Graf H (2006) The network of innovators in Jena: an application of social network analysis. Res Policy 35:463–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Castiglionesi, F. Navarro, N (2008) Optimal Fragile Financial Networks. Second Singapore International Conference on Finance 2008. EFA 2008 Athens Meetings Paper

  7. Chen YS, Chang KC (2010) The relationship between a firm's patent quality and its market value—the case of US pharmaceutical industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 77(1):20–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi C, Kim S, Park Y (2007) A patent-based cross impact analysis for quantitative estimation of technological impact: the case of information and communication technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74(8):1296–1314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Coleman J (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am J Sociol 94:95–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Duysters GM, Hagedoorn J, Lemmens CEAV (2003) The effect of alliance block membership on innovative performance. Revue d’Économie Industrielle 103:59–70, Special Issue on ‘La Morphogénèse des Réseaux’

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Freeman LC (1979) Centrality in social networks: I conceptual clarification. Soc Netw 1:215–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. García MAS, Ramos CC (2006) Core/periphery structure models: an alternative methodological proposal. Soc Netw 28:442–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Griliches Z (1990) Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. J Econ Lit 28:1661–1707

    Google Scholar 

  14. Haythornthwaite C (1996) Social network analysis: an approach and technique for the study of information exchange. LISR 18:323–342

    Google Scholar 

  15. Heinze, T (2006) Emergence of Nano S&T in Germany: Network, Formation and Company Performance, Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers Innovation System and Policy Analysis, No 7/2006

  16. Joglekar, N (2005) A Behavioral View of Core-Periphery Dynamics in Social Networks. Conference Proceedings, The 23 rd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, July 17–21, 2005, Boston

  17. Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad Manage J 45:1183–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee S, Yoon B, Lee C, Park J (2009) Business planning based on technological capabilities: patent analysis for technology-driven roadmapping. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76(6):769–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leydesdorff L, Vaughan L (2006) Co-occurrence matrices and their applications in information science: extending ACA to the Web environment. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 57(12):1616–1628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Licoppe C, Smoreda Z (2005) Are social networks technologically embedded? How networks are changing today with changes in communication technology. Soc Netw 27(4):317–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2:71–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Moody J (2001) Peer influence groups: identifying dense clusters in large networks. Soc Netw 2:261–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Narin F (1995) Patent as indicators for the evaluation of industrial research output. Scientomertics 34(3):489–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Podolny JM, Stuart TE, Hanan MT (1996) Networks, knowledge, and niches: competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984–1991. Am J Sociol 102(3):659–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Podolny JM, Stuart TE (1995) A role-based ecology of technological change. Am J Sociol 100:1224–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ramlogan R, Mina A, Tampubolon G, Metcalfe J (2007) Networks of knowledge: the distributed nature of medical innovation. Scientometrics 70:459–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rank C, Rank O, Wald A (2006) Integrated versus core-periphery structures in regional biotechnology networks. Eur Manag J 24(1):73–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Scott J (2002) Social Network Analysis: A Handbook, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sternitzke C, Bartkowski A, Schramm R (2008) Visualizing patent statistics by means of social network analysis tools. World Patent Inf 28(2):115–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Stuart TE (1998) Network position and propensities to collaborate: an investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Adm Sci Q 43:668–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Stuart TE (1999) Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms. Adm Sci Q 44:315–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Thompson P (2006) Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: evidence from inventor- and examiner-added citations. Rev Econ Stat 88(2):383–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tsai W (2001) Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Acad Manage J 44(5):996–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Valente TW, Coronges KA, Stevens GD, Cousineau MR (2008) Collaboration and competition in a children's health initiative coalition: a network analysis. Eval Program Plann 31(4):392–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Vanhaverbeke W, Gilsing V, Beerkens B, Duysters G (2009) The role of alliance network redundancy in the creation of core and non-core technologies. J Manag Stud 46(2):215–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. von Wartburg I, Teichert T, Rost K (2005) Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis. Res Policy 34:1591–1607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wassermann, S. Faust, K (1994) Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press

  38. Yoon B, Park Y (2004) A text-mining-based patent network: analytical tool for high-technology trend. J High Technol Managem Res 15:37–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zaheer A, Bell GG (2005) Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strateg Manage J 26:809–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mina A, Ramlogan R, Tampubolon G, Metcalfe J (2007) Mapping evolutionary trajectories: applications to the growth and transformation of medical knowledge. Res Policy 36(5):789–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Fontana R, Nuvolari A, Verspagen B (2009) Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks. An application to data communication standards. Economics of Innovation and New Technology Routledge 18(4):311–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Verspagen B (2007) Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks: a study on the history of fuel cell research. Adv Complex Syst 10(1):93–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am J Sociol 91:481–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  45. Gulati R, Gargiulo M (1999) Where do interorganizational networks come from? Am J Sociol 104(5):1439–1493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hall B, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2000) Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look. NBER Working Paper Series, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  47. Baum JAC, Calabrese T, Silverman BS (2000) Don’t go it alone: alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strateg Manage J 21:267–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Boss M, Elsinger H, Summer M, Thurner S (2004) The network topology of the interbank market, Oesterreichische Nationalbank. Quantitative Finance 4:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Duguet E, MacGarvie M (2005) How well do patent citations measure flows of technology? Evidence from French innovation surveys. J Econ Innov New Tech 14(5):375–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Moody J, McFarland DA, Bender-DeMoll S (2005) Dynamic network visualization: methods for meaning with longitudinal network movies. Am J Sociol 110:1206–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wagner CS (2005) Six case studies of international collaboration in science. Scientometrics 62:3–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Takming University of Science and Technology, Taiwan, Republic of China

    Calvin Weng

  2. Department of Engineering and Tech Mgmt, Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA

    Tugrul U. Daim

Authors
  1. Calvin Weng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tugrul U. Daim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tugrul U. Daim.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 6 The degree and degree centrality of patents
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weng, C., Daim, T.U. Structural Differentiation and Its Implications—Core/Periphery Structure of the Technological Network. J Knowl Econ 3, 327–342 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0048-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0048-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation