Skip to main content
Log in

Two tribes hidden in one genus: the case of Agaedioxenis Villeneuve (Diptera: Tachinidae: Exoristinae)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Organisms Diversity & Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Afrotropical tachinid “genus” Agaedioxenis Villeneuve is taken here as an example of the challenges faced by dipterists in classifying one of the most diverse and species rich families of organisms on Earth. Our study has revealed “two tribes hidden in one genus”, with one lineage representing a genus belonging to the tribe Goniini (Agaedioxenis) and the other representing a genus belonging to Eryciini (Eugaedioxenis gen. nov.). The two genera have been revised through an integrative approach of morphology and genetics (COI barcode sequences). The genus name Agaedioxenis replaces that of Gaedioxenis Townsend as a valid genus name. Agaedioxenis is recognized from five species consisting of two previously described species (Agaedioxenis setifrons (Villeneuve) and Agaedioxenis brevicornis (Villeneuve) both comb. nov.) and three new species (Agaedioxenis kirkspriggsi sp. nov., Agaedioxenis succulentus sp. nov., and Agaedioxenis timidus sp. nov.). Agaedioxenis propinqua (Villeneuve) is recognized as a subjective synonym of A. brevicornis (Villeneuve), syn. nov., and by First Reviser action, the latter is chosen as the senior of the two names. Eugaedioxenis gen. nov. is recognized based on two species, Eugaedioxenis haematodes (Villeneuve), type species and comb. nov., and Eugaedioxenis horridus sp. nov. All new species of both genera are described from South Africa. We further discuss how genetics, morphology, and natural history have contributed to revise the generic circumscription of Agaedioxenis, bringing about both the description of Eugaedioxenis and the revision of the suprageneric classification for these two taxa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cerretti, P., & Barraclough, D. A. (2007). Anomalostomyia namibica, a new genus and species of Afrotropical Tachinidae (Diptera). Italian Journal of Zoology, 74, 101–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerretti, P., O’Hara, J. E., Stireman, J. O., III, Winkler, I. S., & Kirk-Spriggs, A. H. (2013). To ‘Die Hel’ and back. Expeditions of the phylogeny of World Tachinidae Project. Part I: Western Cape, South Africa. The Tachinid Times, 26, 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerretti, P., Di Giulio, A., Romani, R., Inclan, D. J., Whitmore, D., Di Giovanni, F., Scalici, M., & Minelli, A. (2014a). First report of exocrine epithelial glands in oestroid flies: the tachinid sexual patches (Diptera: Calyptratae: Oestroidea: Tachinidae). Acta Zoologica. doi:10.1111/azo.12085.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerretti, P., O’Hara, J. E., Wood, D. M., Shima, H., Inclan, D. J., & Stireman, J. O., III. (2014b). Signal through the noise? Phylogeny of the Tachinidae (Diptera) as inferred from morphological evidence. Systematic Entomology, 39, 335–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosskey, R. W. (1973). A conspectus of the Tachinidae (Diptera) of Australia, including keys to the supraspecific taxa and taxonomic and host catalogues. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History). Entomology. Supplement, 21, 221 pp.

  • Crosskey, R. W. (1976). A taxonomic conspectus of the Tachinidae (Diptera) of the Oriental Region. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History). Entomology. Supplement, 26, 357 pp.

  • Crosskey, R. W. (1980). Family Tachinidae. In R. W. Crosskey (Ed.), Catalogue of the Diptera of the Afrotropical Region (pp. 822–882). London: British Museum (Natural History).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosskey, R. W. (1984). Annotated keys to the genera of Tachinidae (Diptera) found in tropical and southern Africa. Annals of the Natal Museum, 26, 189–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenhuis, N. L., Pape, T., & Pont, A. C. (2008). The problems of subsequent typification in genus-group names and use of the Zoological Record: a study of selected post-1930 Diptera genus-group names without type species designations. Zootaxa, 1912, 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenhuis, N. L., Pont, A. C., & Whitmore, D. (2015). Nomenclatural studies toward a world list of Diptera genus-group names. Part IV: Charles Henry Tyler Townsend. Zootaxa.

  • Herting, B. (1957). Das weibliche Postabdomen des calyptraten Fliegen (Diptera) und sein Merkmalswert für die Systematik der Gruppe. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Ökologie der Tiere, 45, 429–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herting, B. (1960). Biologie der westpaläarktischen Raupenfliegen. Dipt., Tachinidae. Monographien zur angewandten Entomologie, 16, 188 pp.

  • International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. (1999). International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Fourth edition adopted by the International Union of Biological Sciences. London: International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine, J. F. (1981). Morphology and terminology — adults. In McAlpine, J. F. Peterson, B. V. Shewell, G. E. Teskey, H. J. Vockeroth, J. R. & Wood, D. M. (Eds), Manual of Nearctic Diptera. Vol. 1. Research Branch, Agriculture Canada Monograph, 27, 9–63.

  • Mellini, E. (1991). Sinossi di biologia dei Ditteri Larvevoridi. Bollettino dell’Istituto di Entomologia “Guido Grandi” dell’Università di Bologna, 45(1990), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesnil, L. P. (1975). 64g. Larvaevorinae (Tachininae). Die Fliegender Palaearktischen Region, 10 (Lieferung 309), 1305–1384.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, J. E. (2002). Revision of the Polideini (Tachinidae) of America north of Mexico. Studia Dipterologica. Supplement, 10, 170 pp.

  • O’Hara, J. E. (2013). History of tachinid classification (Diptera, Tachinidae). ZooKeys, 316, 1–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, J. E. (2014). World genera of the Tachinidae (Diptera) and their regional occurrence. Version 8.0. PDF document, 87 pp. http://www.nadsdiptera.org/Tach/WorldTachs/Genera [verified November 2014].

  • Rambaut, A. (2014). FigTree 1.4.1. Tree Figure Drawing Tool (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/).

  • Rambaut, A., Suchard, M. A., Xie, D., & Drummond, A. J. (2014). Tracer v1.6, Available from http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer.

  • Ratnasingham, S., & Hebert, P. D. N. (2007). BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System (http://www.barcodinglife.org). Molecular Ecology Notes, 7, 355–364.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rokas, A., & Carroll, S. B. (2005). More genes or more taxa? The relative contribution of gene number and taxon number to phylogenetic accuracy. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 22, 1337–1344.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ronquist, F., & Huelsenbeck, J. P. (2003). MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics, 19, 1572–1574.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. A., Woodley, N. E., Janzen, D. H., Hallwachs, W., & Hebert, P. D. N. (2006). DNA barcodes reveal cryptic host-specificity within the presumed polyphagous members of a genus of parasitoid flies (Diptera: Tachinidae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 103, 3657–3662.

  • Smith, M. A., Wood, D. M., Janzen, D. H., Hallwachs, W., & Hebert, P. D. N. (2007). DNA barcodes affirm that 16 species of apparently generalist tropical parasitoid flies (Diptera: Tachinidae) are not all generalists. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 104, 4967–4972.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stamatakis, A. (2014). RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stireman, J. O., III. (2002). Phylogenetic relationships of tachinid flies in subfamily Exoristinae (Tachinidae: Diptera) based on 28S rDNA and elongation factor-1α. Systematic Entomology, 27, 409–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stireman, J. O., III, O’Hara, J. E., Moulton, K., Cerretti, P., & Winkler, I. S. (2013). Progress towards a phylogeny of world Tachinidae. Year 1. The Tachinid Times, 26, 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tachi, T., & Shima, H. (2010). Molecular phylogeny of the subfamily Exoristinae (Diptera, Tachinidae), with discussions on the evolutionary history of female oviposition strategy. Systematic Entomology, 35, 148–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura, K., Stecher, G., Peterson, D., Filipski, A., & Kumar, S. (2013). MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 30, 2725–2729.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, C. H. T. (1943) Addenda and corrigenda [to Townsend’s Manual of myiology in twelve parts, Part XI, 1941]. Privately published, Itaquaquecetuba, São Paulo. Pp. 331–342.

  • Tschorsnig, H.-P. (1985). Taxonomie forstlich wichtiger Parasiten: Untersuchungen zur Struktur des männlichen Postabdomens der Raupenfliegen (Diptera, Tachinidae). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde Serie A (Biologie), 383, 1–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villeneuve, J. (1937). Descriptions de myodaires supérieurs. Revue de Zoologie et de Botanique Africaines, 29, 205–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villeneuve, J. (1939). Myodaires supérieurs africains (descriptions et observations). Bulletin du Musée Royal d’Histoire Naturelle de Belgique, 15(48), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. M. (1987) Tachinidae. In McAlpine, J. F. Peterson, B. V. Shewell, G. E. Teskey, H. J. Vockeroth, J. R., & Wood, D. M. (Eds), Manual of Nearctic Diptera. Vol. 2. Research Branch, Agriculture Canada Monograph, 28, 1193–1269.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Ashley Kirk-Spriggs (NMB), Burgert Muller (NMDA), and Nigel Wyatt (BMNH) who enabled our studies of the valuable material preserved in their institutions. Thanks to Daniel Whitmore (BMNH) for information about the holotype of A. brevicornis and to Mara Tisato (Centro Nazionale Biodiversità Forestale, Verona, Italy) for help composing plates. Thomas Pape (Natural History Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen) provided the nomenclatural advice on the interpretation of Villeneuve’s genus-group names. Finally, we thank Knut Rognes (University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway) and an anonymous reviewer for their constructive comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by U.S. National Science Foundation DEB-1146269 to principal investigators J.O.S. and J.E.O. and to major collaborator P.C.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierfilippo Cerretti.

Additional information

This work has been registered in ZooBank, http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0C53D317-5C05-45D7-A9E4-FB6E6D6F28DE

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cerretti, P., O’Hara, J.E., Winkler, I.S. et al. Two tribes hidden in one genus: the case of Agaedioxenis Villeneuve (Diptera: Tachinidae: Exoristinae). Org Divers Evol 15, 489–512 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-015-0211-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-015-0211-0

Keywords

Navigation