Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Feasibility and functional outcome of laparoscopic intersphincteric rectal resection for ultra-low rectal cancer

  • Preliminary Clinical Study
  • Published:
Hellenic Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Aim-Background

The Aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and analyze the functional outcome of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (LISR) in ultra-low rectal cancer. The preservation of anal function following curative operations for low rectal cancer is becoming increasingly important. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection of the rectum is the utmost sphincter saving operation for rectal cancer. The rectum is laparoscopically resected along with the internal anal sphincter, providing an adequate distal margin for even the ultra-low tumours of the rectum.

Methods

Between 2008 and 2012, nine patients, 2 with a T3 tumour that received preoperative chemoradiotherapy and 7 patients with a non-fixed T2 rectal adenocarcinoma, underwent LISR by a single surgeon. Preoperative tumour staging included endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS) and pelvic MRI. Patients with multiple distant metastases, tumour invasion into adjacent organs and invasion into the external anal sphincter and/or levator ani, were excluded from LISR. Covering ileostomy in seven patients was reversed with a satisfactory functional outcome in each case.

Results

All patients underwent LISR with curative intent. There was no postoperative mortality. Complications included anal stenosis, prolapse of the neorectum and pelvic hematoma. The overall quality of life and functional outcome were deemed satisfactory.

Conclusion

In selected patients, intersphincteric rectal resection may provide an acceptable functional outcome for ultra-low rectal cancer patients, without a permanent stoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rullier E, Zerbib F, Laurent C, Bonnel C, Caudry M, Saric J, Parneix M. Intersphincteric resection with excision of internal anal sphincter for conservative treatment of very low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 1168–1175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kohler A, Athanasiadis S, Ommer A, Psarakis E. Longterm results of low anterior resection with intersphincteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum: analysis of 31 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 843–850

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, Teleky B, Wunderlich M. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 1376–1378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rullier E, Laurent C, Bretagnol F, Rullier A, Vendrely V, Zerbib F. Sphincter-saving resection for all rectal carcinomas: the end of the 2-cm distal rule. Ann Surg 2005; 241: 465–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vorobiev GI, Odaryuk TS, Tsarkov PV, Talalakin AI, Rybakov EG. Resection of the rectum and total excision of the internal anal sphincter with smooth muscle plasty and colonic pouch for treatment of ultralow rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 2004; 91:1506–1512

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Saito N, Ono M, Sugito M, Ito M, Morihiro M, Kosugi C, Sato K, Kotaka M, Nomura S, Arai M, Kobatake T. Early results of intersphincteric resection for patients with very low rectal cancer: an active approach to avoid a permanent colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 459–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tiret E, Poupardin B, McNamara D, Dehni N, Parc R. Ultralow anterior resection with intersphincteric dissection—what is the limit of safe sphincter preservation? Colorectal Dis 2003; 5: 454–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rullier E, Goffre B, Bonnel C, Zerbib F, Caudry M, Saric J. Preoperative radiochemotherapy and sphincter-saving resection for T3 carcinomas of the lower third of the rectum. Ann Surg 2001; 234: 633–640

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rullier E, Laurent C, Zerbib F, Belleannee G, Caudry M, Saric J. Conservative treatment of adenocarcinomas of the anorectal junction by preoperative radiotherapy and intersphincteral resection. Ann Chir 2000; 125: 618–624

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gerard JP, Chapet O, Nemoz C, Hartweig J, Romestaing P, Coquard R, Barbet N, Maingon P, Mahe M, Baulieux J, Partensky C, Papillon M, Glehen O, Crozet B, Grandjean JP Adeleine P. Improved sphincter preservation in low rectal cancer with high-dose preoperative radiotherapy: the lyonnR96-02 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 2404–2409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Luppi G, Santantonio M, Bertolini F, Fiorica F, Zanelli F, Gavioli M, Balli M, Silingardi V. Preoperative concomitant radio therapy and chemotherapy in ultrasound-staged T3 and T4 rectal cancer. Tumori 2003; 89: 152–156

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Kiss DR, Rawet V, Scanavini A, Santinho PM, Nadalin W. Preoperative chemoradiation therapy for low rectal cancer. Impact on downstaging and sphincter-saving operations. Hepatogastroenterology 2004; 51:1703–1707

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Parks AG, Percy JP. Rectal carcinoma; restorative resection using a sutured colo-anal anastomosis. Int Surg 1983; 68: 7–11

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lazorthes F, Fages P, Chiotasso P, Lemozy J, Bloom E. Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 1986; 73: 136–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Parc R, Tiret E, Frileux P, Moszkowski E, Loygue J. Resection and colo-anal anastomosis with colonic reservoir for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1986; 73: 139–141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bretagnol F, Rullier E, Laurent C, Zerbib F, Gontier R, Saric J. Comparison of functional results and quality of life between intersphincteric resection and conventional coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47:832–838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tilney HS, Tekkis PP. Extending the horizons of restorative rectal surgery: intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Colorectal Disease. 2008;10(1):3–15.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Laurent C, Paumet T, Leblanc F, Denost Q, Rullier E. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus open surgery approach. Colorectal Disease. 2012;14(1):35–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fujimoto Y, Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, et al. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2010;14(4):645–650.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamamoto S, Fukunaga M, Miyajima N, Okuda J, Konishi F, Watanabe M. Impact of conversion on surgical outcomes after laparoscopic operation for rectal carcinoma: a retrospective study of 1,073 patients. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2009;208(3):383–389.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ. Five-year follow-up of the medical research council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. British journal of surgery. 2010;97(11):1638–1645.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP. Conversion rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a predictive model with 1253 patients. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. 2005;19(1):47–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Scheidbach H, Benedix F, Hügel O, Kose D, Köckerling F, Lippert H. Laparoscopic approach to colorectal procedures in the obese patient: risk factor or benefit? Obesity Surgery. 2008;18(1):66–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bège T, Lelong B, Francon D, Turrini O, Guiramand J, Delpero JR. Impact of obesity on short-term results of laparoscopic rectal cancer resection. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. 2009;23(7):1460–1464.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Teramoto T, Watanabe M, Kitajima M. Per anum intersphincteric rectal dissection with direct coloanal anastomosis for lower rectal cancer. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 1997;40(10):S43–S47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Watanabe M, Teramoto T, Hasegawa H, Kitajima M. Laproscopic ultralow anterior resection combined with per anum intersphincteric rectal dissection for lower rectal cancer. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2000;43(1):s94–s97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Uchikoshi F, Nishida T, Ueshima S, Nakahara M, Matsuda H. Laparoscope-assisted anal sphincter-preserving operation preceded by transanal procedure. Techniques in Coloproctology. 2006;10(1):5–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yoo JH, Hasegawa H, Ishii Y, Nishibori H, Watanabe M, Kitajima M. Long-term outcome of per anum intersphincteric rectal dissection with direct coloanal anastomosis for lower rectal cancer. Colorectal Disease. 2005;7(5):434–440.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Funahashi K., Shiokawa H., Teramoto T., Koike J., Kaneko H. Clinical Outcome of Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection Combined with Transanal Rectal Dissection for T3 Low Rectal Cancer in Patients with a Narrow Pelvis Int J Surg Oncol. 2011; 2011: 901574

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. S. Mavrantonis.

Additional information

This manuscript has been written after invitation to the Author C. S. Mavrantonis, by editorial board of the journal. The manuscript has been peer — reviewed

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mavrantonis, C.S. Feasibility and functional outcome of laparoscopic intersphincteric rectal resection for ultra-low rectal cancer. Hellenic J Surg 84, 282–286 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13126-012-0044-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13126-012-0044-7

Key words

Navigation