Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Safety margin of minimized contrast volume during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with chronic kidney disease

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Maximum allowable contrast dose (MACD) calculated as body weight × 5/serum creatinine has been a standard contrast dye volume (CV) used to decrease contrast-induced acute kidney injury. Recent advances in intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can dramatically minimize CV. The safe threshold when using an extremely low-dose CV is unknown. This study was designed as a multicenter, retrospective study of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 ml/min/1.73 m2 undergoing elective PCI. We divided the patients into three groups according to following criteria: (1) low dose, CV/eGFR ratio <1.0; (2) medium dose, CV/eGFR ratio ≥1 and <MACD; and (3) high dose, CV ≥MACD. A total of 100 patients were enrolled. Average age was 74 ± 8 years, 64 % were male and 48 % were diabetic. Mean baseline eGFR was 22.8 ± 6.0 ml/min/1.73 m2. CV in the three groups was 15 ± 6 ml (n = 18), 69 ± 39 ml (n = 47) and 224 ± 99 ml (n = 35), respectively. The incidences of CI-AKI were 0, 11 and 23 %, respectively (p = 0.02). All-cause death or introduction of maintenance hemodialysis at 1 year was 0, 13.8 and 31 %, respectively (p = 0.01). Extreme reduction of CV to a CV/eGFR ratio <1.0 may reduce CI-AKI and achieve better clinical outcomes following PCI in patients with severe CKD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abe M, Kimura T, Morimoto T, Furukawa Y, Kita T. Incidence of and risk factors for contrast-induced nephropathy after cardiac catheterization in Japanese patients. Circ J. 2009;73(8):1518–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gruberg L, Mintz GS, Mehran R, Gangas G, Lansky AJ, Kent KM, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Leon MB. The prognostic implications of further renal function deterioration within 48 h of interventional coronary procedures in patients with pre-existent chronic renal insufficiency. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36(5):1542–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldenberg I, Chonchol M, Guetta V. Reversible acute kidney injury following contrast exposure and the risk of long-term mortality. Am J Nephrol. 2009;29(2):136–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mager A, Vaknin Assa H, Lev EI, Bental T, Assali A, Kornowski R. The ratio of contrast volume to glomerular filtration rate predicts outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;78(2):198–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kawamura Y, Morino Y, Nagaoka M, Matsukage T, Masuda N, Ikari Y. Impact of chronic kidney disease on clinical and angiographic results following implantation of sirolimus-eluting coronary stents. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2011;26(1):18–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Morikawa S, Sone T, Tsuboi H, Mukawa H, Morishima I, Uesugi M, Morita Y, Numaguchi Y, Okumura K, Murohara T. Renal protective effects and the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy by atrial natriuretic peptide. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(12):1040–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen HH. Atrial natriuretic peptide for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: what’s old is new but at the right dose and duration of therapy! J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(12):1047–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kawashima S, Takano H, Iino Y, Takayama M, Takano T. Prophylactic hemodialysis does not prevent contrast-induced nephropathy after cardiac catheterization in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. Circ J. 2006;70(5):553–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Quintavalle C, Fiore D, De Micco F, Visconti G, Focaccio A, Golia B, Ricciardelli B, Donnarumma E, Bianco A, Zabatta MA, Troncone G, Colombo A, Briguori C, Condorelli G. Impact of a high loading dose of atorvastatin on contrast-induced acute kidney injury. Circulation. 2012;126(25):3008–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chertow GM, Normand SL, McNeil BJ. “Renalism”: inappropriately low rates of coronary angiography in elderly individuals with renal insufficiency. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15(9):2462–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cigarroa RG, Lange RA, Williams RH, Hillis LD. Dosing of contrast material to prevent contrast nephropathy in patients with renal disease. Am J Med. 1989;86(6 Pt 1):649–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Laskey WK, Jenkins C, Selzer F, Marroquin OC, Wilensky RL, Glaser R, Cohen HA, Holmes DR Jr. Volume-to-creatinine clearance ratio: a pharmacokinetically based risk factor for prediction of early creatinine increase after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(7):584–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Barrett BJ, Parfrey PS. Clinical practice. Preventing nephropathy induced by contrast medium. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(4):379–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kane GC, Doyle BJ, Lerman A, Barsness GW, Best PJ, Rihal CS. Ultra-low contrast volumes reduce rates of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51(1):89–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ogata N, Matsukage T, Toda E, Tamiya S, Fujii T, Nakazawa G, Masuda N, Morino Y, Ikari Y. Intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary interventions with minimum contrast volume for prevention of the radiocontrast-induced nephropathy: report of two cases. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2011;26(1):83–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Matsuo S, Imai E, Horio M, Yasuda Y, Tomita K, Nitta K, Yamagata K, Tomino Y, Yokoyama H, Hishida A. Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53(6):982–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mehran R, Aymong ED, Nikolsky E, Lasic Z, Iakovou I, Fahy M, Mintz GS, Lansky AJ, Moses JW, Stone GW, Leon MB, Dangas G. A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(7):1393–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Freeman RV, O’Donnell M, Share D, Meengs WL, Kline-Rogers E, Clark VL, DeFranco AC, Eagle KA, McGinnity JG, Patel K, Maxwell-Eward A, Bondie D, Moscucci M. Nephropathy requiring dialysis after percutaneous coronary intervention and the critical role of an adjusted contrast dose. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90(10):1068–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. McCullough PA, Adam A, Becker CR, Davidson C, Lameire N, Stacul F, Tumlin J. Risk prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98(6A):27K–36K.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Altmann DB, Zwas D, Spatz A, Bergman G, Spokojny A, Rivai S, Sanborn TA. Use of the contrast volume to estimated creatinine clearance ratio to predict renal failure after angiography. J Interv Cardiol. 1997;10(2):113–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nyman U, Bjork J, Aspelin P, Marenzi G. Contrast medium dose-to-GFR ratio: a measure of systemic exposure to predict contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention. Acta Radiol. 2008;49(6):658–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brown JR, Robb JF, Block CA, Schoolwerth AC, Kaplan AV, O’Connor GT, Solomon RJ, Malenka DJ. Does safe dosing of iodinated contrast prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury? Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3(4):346–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tanaga K, Tarao K, Nakamura Y, Inoue T, Jo K, Ishikawa T, Miyazaki A. Percutaneous coronary intervention causes increase of serum cystatin C concentration even in the patients with a low risk of contrast-induced nephropathy. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2012;27:168–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was partly supported by a grant from Daiichi-Sankyo Pharmaceutical Company. We thank Ms Sachiko Yajima (Tokai University) for data management.

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have a conflict of interest regarding this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuji Ikari.

Additional information

On behalf of the Minicon Registry Investigators.

UMIN-CRT: UMIN0000008436.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ogata, N., Ikari, Y., Nanasato, M. et al. Safety margin of minimized contrast volume during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with chronic kidney disease. Cardiovasc Interv and Ther 29, 209–215 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-014-0245-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-014-0245-9

Keywords

Navigation