Skip to main content
Log in

Patient compliance based on genetic medicine: a literature review

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Community Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For this literature review, medical literature data bases were searched for studies on patient compliance after genetic risk assessment. The review focused on conditions where secondary or tertiary preventive options exist, namely cancer syndromes (BRCA-related cancer, HNPCC/colon cancer), hemochromatosis, thrombophilia, smoking cessation, and obesity. As a counterpart, patient compliance was assessed regarding medication adherence and medical advice in some of the most epidemiologically important conditions (including high blood pressure, metabolic syndrome, and coronary heart disease) after receiving medical advice based on nongenetic risk information or a combination of genetic and nongenetic risk information. In the majority of studies based on genetic risk assessments, patients were confronted with predictive rather than diagnostic genetic profiles. Most of the studies started from a knowledge base around 10 years ago when DNA testing was at an early stage, limited in scope and specificity, and costly. The major result is that overall compliance of patients after receiving a high-risk estimate from genetic testing for a given condition is high. However, significant behavior change does not take place just because the analyte is “genetic.” Many more factors play a role in the complex process of behavioral tuning. Without adequate counseling and guidance, patients may interpret risk estimates of predictive genetic testing with an increase in fear and anxiety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdulrahman GOJ, Rahman GA (2012) Epidemiology of breast cancer in Europe and Africa. J Cancer Epidemiol 2012:915610

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Adams PC, Reboussin DM, Barton JC et al (2005) Hemochromatosis and iron-overload screening in a racially diverse population. N Engl J Med 352:1769–1778

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aktan-Collan K, Haukkala A, Mecklin JP et al (2001) Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC): a prospective follow-up study. Int J Cancer 93:608–611

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alberg AJ, Ford JG, Samet JM et al (2007) Epidemiology of lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest 132:29S–55S

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allen KJ, Nisselle AE, Collins VR et al (2008) Asymptomatic individuals at genetic risk of haemochromatosis take appropriate steps to prevent disease related to iron overload. Liver Int 28:363–369

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Antill Y, Reynolds J, Young MA et al (2006a) Risk-reducing surgery in women with familial susceptibility for breast and/or ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer 42:621–628

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Antill Y, Reynolds J, Young MA et al (2006b) Screening behavior in women at increased familial risk for breast cancer. Fam Cancer 5:359–368

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arnlöv J, Ingelsson E, Sundstrom J et al (2010) Impact of body mass index and the metabolic syndrome on the risk of cardiovascular disease and death in middle-aged men. Circulation 121:230–236

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Audrain J, Boyd NR, Roth J et al (1997) Genetic susceptibility testing in smoking-cessation treatment: one-year outcomes of a randomized trial. Addict Behav 22:741–751

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bacon BR, Sadiq SA (1997) Hereditary hemochromatosis: presentation and diagnosis in the 1990s. Am J Gastroenterol 92:784–789

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benner JS, Glynn RJ, Mogun H et al (2002) Long-term persistence in use of statin therapy in elderly patients. JAMA 288:455–461

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bize R, Burnand B, Mueller Y et al (2007) Effectiveness of biomedical risk assessment as an aid for smoking cessation: a systematic review. Tob Control 16:151–156

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blech J (2009) Wahrsager im Labor. Available at http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-65490008.html

  • Bleiker EM, Menko FH, Taal BG et al (2005) Screening behavior of individuals at high risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 128:280–287

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bloss CS, Darst BF, Topol EJ et al (2011a) Direct-to-consumer personalized genomic testing. Hum Mol Genet 20:R132–41

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bloss CS, Schork NJ, Topol EJ (2011b) Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk. N Engl J Med 364:524–534

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonadona V, Saltel P, Desseigne F et al (2002) Cancer patients who experienced diagnostic genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: reactions and behavior after the disclosure of a positive test result. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:97–104

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Botkin JR, Smith KR, Croyle RT et al (2003) Genetic testing for a BRCA1 mutation: prophylactic surgery and screening behavior in women 2 years post testing. Am J Med Genet A 118A:201–209

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bredenoord AL, Kroes HY, Cuppen E et al (2011) Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered. Trends Genet 27:41–47

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Briesacher BA, Andrade SE, Fouayzi H et al (2008) Comparison of drug adherence rates among patients with seven different medical conditions. Pharmacotherapy 28:437–443

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burke W, Imperatore G, McDonnell SM et al (2000) Contribution of different HFE genotypes to iron overload disease: a pooled analysis. Genet Med 2:271–277

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burke TA, Sturkenboom MC, Lu SE et al (2006) Discontinuation of antihypertensive drugs among newly diagnosed hypertensive patients in UK general practice. J Hypertens 24:1193–1200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burton AM, Peterson SK, Marani SK et al (2010) Health and lifestyle behaviors among persons at risk of Lynch syndrome. Cancer Causes Control 21:513–521

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsten C, Burke W (2006) Potential for genetics to promote public health: genetics research on smoking suggests caution about expectations. JAMA 296:2480–2482

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chan DC, Shrank WH, Cutler D et al (2010) Patient, physician, and payment predictors of statin adherence. Med Care 48:196–202

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Claassen L, Henneman L, Kindt I et al (2010) Perceived risk and representations of cardiovascular disease and preventive behaviour in people diagnosed with familial hypercholesterolemia: a cross-sectional questionnaire study. J Health Psychol 15:33–43

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Claes E, Denayer L, Evers-Kiebooms G et al (2005a) Predictive testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: subjective perception regarding colorectal and endometrial cancer, distress, and health-related behavior at one year post-test. Genet Test 9:54–65

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Claes E, Evers-Kiebooms G, Decruyenaere M et al (2005b) Surveillance behavior and prophylactic surgery after predictive testing for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. Behav Med 31:93–105

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Claes E, Evers-Kiebooms G, Denayer L et al (2005c) Predictive genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: psychological distress and illness representations 1 year following disclosure. J Genet Couns 14:349–363

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins V, Meiser B, Gaff C et al (2005) Screening and preventive behaviors one year after predictive genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 104:273–281

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins V, Meiser B, Ukoumunne OC et al (2007) The impact of predictive genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: three years after testing. Genet Med 9:290–297

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins RE, Wright AJ, Marteau TM (2011) Impact of communicating personalized genetic risk information on perceived control over the risk: a systematic review. Genet Med 13:273–277

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DiGianni LM, Rue M, Emmons K et al (2006) Complementary medicine use before and 1 year following genetic testing for BRCA1/2 mutations. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15:70–75

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doblhammer G, Kreft D, Dethloff A (2012) Life years gained. Long-term trends in mortality by causes of death in Germany and in an international perspective. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 55:448–458

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eichinger S (2009) Consequences of thrombophilia screening for life quality in women before prescription of oral contraceptives and family members of VTE patients. Hämostaseologie 29:110–111

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ersig AL, Hadley DW, Koehly LM (2009a) Colon cancer screening practices and disclosure after receipt of positive or inconclusive genetic test results for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Cancer 115:4071–4079

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ersig AL, Williams JK, Hadley DW et al (2009b) Communication, encouragement, and cancer screening in families with and without mutations for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: a pilot study. Genet Med 11:728–734

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foster C, Watson M, Eeles R et al (2007) Predictive genetic testing for BRCA1/2 in a UK clinical cohort: three-year follow-up. Br J Cancer 96:718–724

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frosch DL, Mello P, Lerman C (2005) Behavioral consequences of testing for obesity risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:1485–1489

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner V, Weber M, Eichinger S (2008) The emotional impact of genetic testing and aspects of counseling prior to prescription of oral contraceptives. Contraception 78:392–398

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger TM, Miedema BW, Geana MV et al (2008) Improving rates for screening colonoscopy: analysis of the health information national trends survey (HINTS I) data. Surg Endosc 22:527–533

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hadley DW, Jenkins JF, Dimond E et al (2004) Colon cancer screening practices after genetic counseling and testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:39–44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hadley DW, Jenkins JF, Steinberg SM et al (2008) Perceptions of cancer risks and predictors of colon and endometrial cancer screening in women undergoing genetic testing for Lynch syndrome. J Clin Oncol 26:948–954

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halbert CH, Lynch H, Lynch J et al (2004) Colon cancer screening practices following genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) mutations. Arch Intern Med 164:1881–1887

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon K (2012) How useful is whole genome sequencing to predict disease? Available at http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=whole-genome-sequencing-predict-disease. Accessed 8 April 2012

  • Harvey-Berino J, Gold EC, West DS et al (2001) Does genetic testing for obesity influence confidence in the ability to lose weight? A pilot investigation. J Am Diet Assoc 101:1351–1353

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hasford J, Schroder-Bernhardi D, Rottenkolber M et al (2007) Persistence with antihypertensive treatments: results of a 3-year follow-up cohort study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 63:1055–1061

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hellmann EA, Leslie ND, Moll S (2003) Knowledge and educational needs of individuals with the Factor V Leiden mutation. J Thromb Haemost 1:2335–2339

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henrikson NB, Bowen D, Burke W (2009) Does genomic risk information motivate people to change their behavior? Genome Med 1:37

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heshka J, Palleschi C, Wilson B et al (2008a) Cognitive and behavioural effects of genetic testing for thrombophilia. J Genet Couns 17:288–296

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heshka JT, Palleschi C, Howley H et al (2008b) A systematic review of perceived risks, psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing. Genet Med 10:19–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hicken BL, Tucker DC, Barton JC (2003) Patient compliance with phlebotomy therapy for iron overload associated with hemochromatosis. Am J Gastroenterol 98:2072–2077

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter DJ, Khoury MJ, Drazen JM (2008) Letting the genome out of the bottle–will we get our wish? N Engl J Med 358:105–107

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackevicius CA, Mamdani M, Tu JV (2002) Adherence with statin therapy in elderly patients with and without acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 288:462–467

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Järvinen HJ, Aarnio M, Mustonen H et al (2000) Controlled 15-year trial on screening for colorectal cancer in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 118:829–834

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KA, Trimbath JD, Petersen GM et al (2002) Impact of genetic counseling and testing on colorectal cancer screening behavior. Genet Test 6:303–306

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katz DA, Graber M, Birrer E et al (2009) Health beliefs toward cardiovascular risk reduction in patients admitted to chest pain observation units. Acad Emerg Med 16:379–387

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kauff ND, Satagopan JM, Robson ME et al (2002) Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med 346:1609–1615

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kauff ND, Domchek SM, Friebel TM et al (2008) Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for the prevention of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast and gynecologic cancer: a multicenter, prospective study. J Clin Oncol 26:1331–1337

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kinney AY, Simonsen SE, Baty BJ et al (2006) Risk reduction behaviors and provider communication following genetic counseling and BRCA1 mutation testing in an African American kindred. J Genet Couns 15:293–305

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kinney AY, Hicken B, Simonsen SE et al (2007) Colorectal cancer surveillance behaviors among members of typical and attenuated FAP families. Am J Gastroenterol 102:153–162

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kujovich JL (2011) Factor V Leiden thrombophilia. Genet Med 13:1–16

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Legnani C, Razzaboni E, Gremigni P et al (2006) Psychological impact of testing for thrombophilic alterations. Thromb Haemost 96:348–355

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman C, Rimer B, Trock B et al (1990) Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening. Prev Med 19:279–290

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman C, Gold K, Audrain J et al (1997) Incorporating biomarkers of exposure and genetic susceptibility into smoking cessation treatment: effects on smoking-related cognitions, emotions, and behavior change. Health Psychol 16:87–99

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman C, Hughes C, Croyle RT et al (2000) Prophylactic surgery decisions and surveillance practices one year following BRCA1/2 testing. Prev Med 31:75–80

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liede A, Metcalfe K, Hanna D et al (2000) Evaluation of the needs of male carriers of mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 who have undergone genetic counseling. Am J Hum Genet 67:1494–1504

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindqvist PG, Dahlback B (2003) Reactions to awareness of activated protein C resistance carriership: a descriptive study of 270 women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82:467–470

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Litton JK, Westin SN, Ready K et al (2009) Perception of screening and risk reduction surgeries in patients tested for a BRCA deleterious mutation. Cancer 115:1598–1604

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loader S, Shields CG, Rowley PT (2004) Impact of genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility. Genet Test 8:1–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loader S, Shields C, Rowley PT (2005) Impact of genetic counseling and DNA testing on individuals with colorectal cancer with a positive family history: a population-based study. Genet Test 9:313–319

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lodder LN, Frets PG, Trijsburg RW et al (2002) One year follow-up of women opting for presymptomatic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2: emotional impact of the test outcome and decisions on risk management (surveillance or prophylactic surgery). Breast Cancer Res Treat 73:97–112

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loescher LJ, Lim KH, Leitner O et al (2009) Cancer surveillance behaviors in women presenting for clinical BRCA genetic susceptibility testing. Oncol Nurs Forum 36:E57–67

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes N, Zanini AC, Casella-Filho A et al (2008) Metabolic syndrome patient compliance with drug treatment. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 63:573–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch HT, Snyder C, Lynch JF et al (2006) Patient responses to the disclosure of BRCA mutation tests in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer families. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 165:91–97

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marteau TM, Lerman C (2001) Genetic risk and behavioural change. BMJ 322:1056–1059

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marteau TM, Weinman J (2006) Self-regulation and the behavioural response to DNA risk information: a theoretical analysis and framework for future research. Soc Sci Med 62:1360–1368

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marteau TM, French DP, Griffin SJ et al (2010) Effects of communicating DNA-based disease risk estimates on risk-reducing behaviours. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10, CD007275

  • Mazzaglia G, Ambrosioni E, Alacqua M et al (2009) Adherence to antihypertensive medications and cardiovascular morbidity among newly diagnosed hypertensive patients. Circulation 120:1598–1605

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McBride CM, Bepler G, Lipkus IM et al (2002) Incorporating genetic susceptibility feedback into a smoking cessation program for African-American smokers with low income. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:521–528

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McBride CM, Koehly LM, Sanderson SC et al (2010) The behavioral response to personalized genetic information: will genetic risk profiles motivate individuals and families to choose more healthful behaviors? Annu Rev Public Health 31:89–103

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McInerney-Leo A, Hadley D, Kase RG et al (2006) BRCA1/2 testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families III: risk perception and screening. Am J Med Genet A 140:2198–2206

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meijers-Heijboer EJ, Verhoog LC, Brekelmans CT et al (2000) Presymptomatic DNA testing and prophylactic surgery in families with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Lancet 355:2015–2020

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meijers-Heijboer H, Brekelmans CT, Menke-Pluymers M et al (2003) Use of genetic testing and prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy in women with breast or ovarian cancer from families with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. J Clin Oncol 21:1675–1681

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meiser B, Halliday JL (2002) What is the impact of genetic counselling in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer? A meta-analytic review. Soc Sci Med 54:1463–1470

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe KA, Liede A, Hoodfar E et al (2000) An evaluation of needs of female BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers undergoing genetic counselling. J Med Genet 37:866–874

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe KA, Snyder C, Seidel J et al (2005) The use of preventive measures among healthy women who carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Fam Cancer 4:97–103

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe KA, Foulkes WD, Kim-Sing C et al (2008) Family history as a predictor of uptake of cancer preventive procedures by women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Clin Genet 73:474–479

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson HD, Zakher B, Cantor A et al (2012) Risk factors for breast cancer for women aged 40 to 49 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 156:635–648

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neutel CI, Campbell NR, Canadian Hypertension Society (2008) Changes in lifestyle after hypertension diagnosis in Canada. Can J Cardiol 24:199–204

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Offit K (2011) Personalized medicine: new genomics, old lessons. Hum Genet 130:3–14

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill SC, Kaufman E, DeMarco T et al (2008) Changes in diet and physical activity following BRCA1/2 testing. J Psychosoc Oncol 26:63–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker-Pope T (2007) DNA isn’t Destiny. Available at http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/09/24/dna-isnt-destiny/

  • Peshkin BN, Schwartz MD, Isaacs C et al (2002) Utilization of breast cancer screening in a clinically based sample of women after BRCA1/2 testing. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:1115–1118

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips KA, Jenkins MA, Lindeman GJ et al (2006) Risk-reducing surgery, screening and chemoprevention practices of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a prospective cohort study. Clin Genet 70:198–206

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker S (2009) My genome, my self. New York Times New, York Edition, 11 January 2009, p. MM24

  • Plon SE, Peterson LE, Friedman LC et al (2000) Mammography behavior after receiving a negative BRCA1 mutation test result in the Ashkenazim: a community-based study. Genet Med 2:307–311

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ponz de Leon M, Benatti P, Di Gregorio C et al (2004) Genetic testing among high-risk individuals in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 90:882–887

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Protani M, Page A, Taylor R et al (2012) Breast cancer risk factors in Queensland women attending population-based mammography screening. Maturitas 71:279–286

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pylvänäinen K, Kairaluoma M, Mecklin JP (2006) Compliance and satisfaction with long-term surveillance in Finnish HNPCC families. Fam Cancer 5:175–178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rahner N, Steinke V, Schlegelberger B, et al. (2010) Clinical utility gene card for: Lynch syndrome (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2). Eur J Hum Genet 18, doi:10.1038/ejhg.2009.232

  • Rosendaal FR, Koster T, Vandenbroucke JP et al (1995) High risk of thrombosis in patients homozygous for Factor V Leiden (activated protein C resistance). Blood 85:1504–1508

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rotimi CN, Marshall PA (2010) Tailoring the process of informed consent in genetic and genomic research. Genome Med 2:20

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson SC, Michie S (2007) Genetic testing for heart disease susceptibility: potential impact on motivation to quit smoking. Clin Genet 71:501–510

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson SC, Wardle J (2005) Will genetic testing for complex diseases increase motivation to quit smoking? Anticipated reactions in a survey of smokers. Health Educ Behav 32:640–653

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson SC, Humphries SE, Hubbart C et al (2008) Psychological and behavioural impact of genetic testing smokers for lung cancer risk: a phase II exploratory trial. J Health Psychol 13:481–494

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson SC, O’Neill SC, White DB et al (2009) Responses to online GSTM1 genetic test results among smokers related to patients with lung cancer: a pilot study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18:1953–1961

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson SC, Persky S, Michie S (2010) Psychological and behavioral responses to genetic test results indicating increased risk of obesity: does the causal pathway from gene to obesity matter? Public Health Genomics 13(1):34–47

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scheuer L, Kauff N, Robson M et al (2002) Outcome of preventive surgery and screening for breast and ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 20:1260–1268

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz MD, Kaufman E, Peshkin BN et al (2003) Bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy and ovarian cancer screening following BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing. J Clin Oncol 21:4034–4041

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz MD, Lerman C, Brogan B et al (2004) Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 counseling and testing on newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 22:1823–1829

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson E, Beck C, Richard H et al (2003) Drug prescriptions after acute myocardial infarction: dosage, compliance, and persistence. Am Heart J 145:438–444

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stoffel EM, Mercado RC, Kohlmann W et al (2010) Prevalence and predictors of appropriate colorectal cancer surveillance in Lynch syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol 105(8):1851–1860

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stolier AJ, Corsetti RL (2005) Newly diagnosed breast cancer patients choose bilateral mastectomy over breast-conserving surgery when testing positive for a BRCA1/2 mutation. Am Surg 71:1031–1033

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ter Bogt NC, Bemelmans WJ, Beltman FW et al (2009) Preventing weight gain: one-year results of a randomized lifestyle intervention. Am J Prev Med 37:270–277

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tinley ST, Houfek J, Watson P et al (2004) Screening adherence in BRCA1/2 families is associated with primary physicians’ behavior. Am J Med Genet A 125A:5–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tyczynski JE, Bray F, Parkin DM (2003) Lung cancer in Europe in 2000: epidemiology, prevention, and early detection. Lancet Oncol 4:45–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk S, Otten W, Timmermans DR et al (2005) What’s the message? Interpretation of an uninformative BRCA1/2 test result for women at risk of familial breast cancer. Genet Med 7:239–245

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wijk BL, Klungel OH, Heerdink ER et al (2005) Rate and determinants of 10-year persistence with antihypertensive drugs. J Hypertens 23:2101–2107

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vos J, Oosterwijk JC, Gomez-Garcia E et al (2011) Exploring the short-term impact of DNA-testing in breast cancer patients: the counselees’ perception matters, but the actual BRCA1/2 result does not. Patient Educ Couns. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.017

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner A, van Kessel I, Kriege MG et al (2005) Long term follow-up of HNPCC gene mutation carriers: compliance with screening and satisfaction with counseling and screening procedures. Fam Cancer 4:295–300

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson M, Foster C, Eeles R et al (2004) Psychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (BRCA1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a UK multi-centre clinical cohort. Br J Cancer 91:1787–1794

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wevers MR, Ausems MG, Verhoef S et al (2011) Behavioral and psychosocial effects of rapid genetic counseling and testing in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients: design of a multicenter randomized clinical trial. BMC Cancer 11:6

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wieacker P, Welling B, German Society of Human Genetics (2008) Indication criteria for genetic testing: familial breast/ovary cancer. Available at http://www.eurogentest.org/aboutus/info/public/unit3/geneCards.xhtml. Accessed 9 September 2012

  • Wright AJ, Takeichi C, Whitwell SC et al (2008) The impact of genetic testing for Crohn’s disease, risk magnitude and graphical format on motivation to stop smoking: an experimental analogue study. Clin Genet 73:306–314

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young RP, Hopkins RJ, Smith M et al (2010) Smoking cessation: the potential role of risk assessment tools as motivational triggers. Postgrad Med J 86:26–33, quiz 31–2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao G, Ford ES, Li C et al (2009) Weight control behaviors in overweight/obese U.S. adults with diagnosed hypertension and diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol 8:13

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are greatly indebted to Professor Heather Skirton, Leigh Jackson, and Lesley Goldsmith, Plymouth University, for helpful discussions and reading an earlier version of the manuscript. The main conclusions of this literature survey were first presented at the symposium “Predictive genetic testing, risk communication and perception” at the Robert-Koch-Institute Berlin, 21st November 2011.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Compliance with ethics guidelines

This study complies with current German laws.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jörg Schmidtke.

Additional information

This article is part of the special issue “Predictive Genetic Testing, Risk Communication and Risk Perception”

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 74.3 kb)

ESM 2

(PDF 127 kb)

ESM 3

(PDF 45.5 kb)

ESM 4

(PDF 49.3 kb)

ESM 5

(PDF 57.3 kb)

ESM 6

(PDF 48.5 kb)

ESM 7

(PDF 61 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schneider, K.I., Schmidtke, J. Patient compliance based on genetic medicine: a literature review. J Community Genet 5, 31–48 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-013-0160-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-013-0160-2

Keywords

Navigation