Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Biology and sign theory: homeopathy emerging as a biosemiotic system

  • Homeopathy and Integrative Medicine
  • Published:
Journal of Medicine and the Person

Abstract

Diluted above Avogadro’s number, homeopathic medicines allegedly do not contain any molecule of their starting-materials. As Western science is historically based on the notion of matter, alternative epistemological models are needed to account for the biological actions of homeopathic high dilutions. One such model is provided by biosemiotics, an interdisciplinary field devoted to the integration of biology and semiotics based on the fundamental belief that sign production and interpretation is one of the immanent and intrinsic features of life. Several experimental studies show that the information carried by high dilutions might be evidenced by means of measurable biological effects ranging from intranuclear epigenetic phenomena to inheritable adaptive processes, and regulatory physiological and behavioral phenomena. Therefore, when the action of homeopathic medicines is considered from the semiotic point of view, they become an endless source for studies aiming not only at therapeutic applications, but also to achieve a more refined understanding of living beings and their relationships with the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schrödinger E (1944) What is life? Mind and matter. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  2. Waisse S (2010) The science of living matter and the autonomy of life: vitalism, antivitalism and neovitalism in the German long nineteenth century. Lambert Academic Publishing, Saarbrücken

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shang A, Huwiler-Müntener K, Nartey L, Jüni P, Dörig S, Sterne JAC et al (2005) Are the clinical effects of homeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy. Lancer 366:726–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rutten ALB, Stolper CF (2008) The 2005 meta-analysis of homeopathy: the importance of post-publication data. Homeopathy 97:169–177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eizayaga J (2013) The Lancet and the announced end of homeopathy: critical review of Shang et al’s. Rev Homeopat 76:17–38

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bellavite P, Marzotto M, Chirumbolo S, Conforti A (2011) Advances in homeopathy and immunology: a review of a clinical research. Front Biosci (Schol Ed) 3:1363–1389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Peirce CS (1932) Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Belknap Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kull K (1999) Biosemiotics in the twentieth century: a view from biology. Semiotica 127:385–414

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hogeweg P (2011) The roots of bioinformatics in theoretical biology. PLOS Comput Biol. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002021

    Google Scholar 

  10. Attwood TK, Gisel A, Eriksson NE, Bongcam-Rudloff E (2011) Concepts, historical milestones and the central place of bioinformatics in modern biology: a European perspective. In: Mahdavi MA (ed) Bioinformatics: trends and methodologies. InTech, Rijeka, pp 3–38

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gould SJ (1997) ‘What is life’ as a problem in history. In: Murphy MM, O’Neill LAJ (eds) What is life? The next fifty years. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 25–40

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hoffmeyer J (1997) Biosemiotics: towards a new synthesis in biology. Eur J Semiot Stud 9:355–376

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eigen M (1997) What will endure of twentieth century biology? In: Murphy MM, O’Neill LAJ (eds) What is life? The next fifty years. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 5–24

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smith JM, Szathmáry E (1997) Language and life. In: Murphy MM, O’Neill LAJ (eds) What is life? The next fifty years. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 67–78

    Google Scholar 

  15. Faria M (2008) Signal transduction codes and cell fate. In: Barbieri M (ed) The codes of life. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 265–283

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Sebeok T (1999) The sign science and the life science. AS/SA 3:387–393

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lagache A (1997) Notes on the conceptual basis of science: looking for the idea of mediation and its tradition. In: Bastide M (ed) Signals and images. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 265–278

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Demangeat JL (2013) Nanosized solvent superstructures in ultramolecular aqueous dilutions: twenty years’ research using proton NMR relaxation. Homeopathy 102:87–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Belllavite P, Marzotto M, Olioso D, Mortti E, Conforti A (2014) High-dilution effects revisited. 1.Physicochemical aspects. Homeopathy 103:4–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Belllavite P, Marzotto M, Olioso D, Mortti E, Conforti A (2014) High-dilution effects revisited. 2.Pharmacodynamic mechanisms. Homeopathy 103:22–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Oliveira CC, Oliveira SM, Goes VM, Probst CM, Krieger MA, Buchi DF (2008) Gene expression profiling of macrophages following mice treatment with immunomodulator medication. J Cell Biochem 104:1364–1377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Frenkel M, Mishra BM, Sen S, Yang P, Pawlus A, Vence I, Leblanc A, Cohen L, Banerji P, Banerji P (2010) Cytotoxic effects of ultra high diluted remedies on breast cancer cells. Int J Oncol 36:395–403

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Borghini F, Dinelli G, Marottu I, Trebbi G, Borghini G, Betti L (2012) Electromagnetic information transfer (EMIT) by ultra high diluted (UHD) solutions: the suggestive hypothesis of an epinegenetic action. Int J High Dilution Res 11:113–114

    Google Scholar 

  24. Khuda-Bukhsh AR (2012) Search for a molecular mechanism of action of the potentized homeopathic drugs in living organisms. Int J High Dilution Res 11:147

    Google Scholar 

  25. Marzotto M, Olioso D, Brizzi M, Tononi P, Cristofoletti M, Bellavite P (2014) Extreme sensitivity of gene expression in human SH-SY5Y neurocytes to ultra-low doses of Gelsemium sempervirens. BMC Complement Altern Med 14:104

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bonamin LV, Moraes Cl, Sanches F, Cardoso TN, Sato C, Duran Filho C, Martini LC (2012) Rats born to mothers treated with dexamethasone 15cH present changes in modulation of inflammatory process. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. doi:10.1155/2012/73

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Coelho CP, D´Almeida V, Pedrazzolli-Neto M, Duran-Filho C, Florio JC, Zincaglia LM, Bonamin LV (2006) Therapeutic and pathogenetic animal models for Dolichos pruriens. Homeopathy 95:136–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rocha MP, Soares FM, Martini LC, Bonamin LV (2008) Behavior of rats treated with Rhus toxicodendron 200cH. Int J High Dilution Res 7:3–6

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bonamin LV, Sato C, Zalla Neto R, Morante G, Cardoso TN, Santana FR, Coelho CP, Osugui L, Popi AF, Hurtado ECP, Mariano M (2013) Immunomodulation of homeopathic Thymulin 5CH in a BCG-induced granuloma model. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. doi:10.1155/2013/686018

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bonamin LV (ed) (2008) Signals and images: contributions and contradictions about high dilution research. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  31. Majewsky V, Arlt S, Shah D, Scherr C, Jager T, Betti L, Trebbi G, Bonamin LV, Klocke P, Baumgartner S (2009) Use of homeopathic preparations in experimental studies with healthy plants. Homeopathy 98:228–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bonamin LV, Endler PC (2010) Animal models for studying homeopathy and high dilutions: conceptual critical review. Homeopathy 99:37–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Betti L, Trebbi G, Zurl M, Nani D, Peruzzi M, Brizzi M (2010) A review of three simple plant models and corresponding statistical tools for basic research in homeopathy. Sci World J 10:2330–2347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Baumgartner S, Doesburg P, Scherr C, Andersen J (2012) Development of a biocrystallisation assay for examining effects of homeopathic preparations using cress seedlings. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. doi:10.1155/2012/125945

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universidade Paulista, Graduate Program in Environmental and Experimental Pathology, R. Dr. Bacelar, 1212, 4th floor, São Paulo, SP, 04026-002, Brazil

    Leoni V. Bonamin

  2. Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo, R. Caio Prado, 102, salas 46-49, Consolação, São Paulo, SP, 01303-000, Brazil

    Silvia Waisse

Authors
  1. Leoni V. Bonamin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Silvia Waisse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leoni V. Bonamin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bonamin, L.V., Waisse, S. Biology and sign theory: homeopathy emerging as a biosemiotic system. J Med Pers 13, 18–22 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12682-014-0191-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12682-014-0191-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation