Abstract
The human being results from a co-constructed narration, which happens within background meanings and cultural frameworks, and in turn provide meanings to assign to each human experience. These meanings precede individual lives, they are their implicit premises, and in that way, they allow us to find significant answers to our experiences and to build a plot to our own story—placing each experience in a precise place that fits within our past and future history. When the experience is extra-ordinary like having a cancer, the need for a meaning is stronger and more difficult: this difficulty is expressed by the psychological suffering. When patients appeal to a psychologist/psychotherapist, they are impelled by the suffering induced in the perception of a break in their narrative and the psychotherapeutic work is a work on the narratives, aimed to help patients in re-writing their own stories from different perspectives. This re-writing will be completely adaptive only when able to produce new frameworks of meaning through the change of implicit premises.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Sacks O (1985) The man who mistook his wife for a hat. Summit Books, New York
Parry A (1991) A universe of stories. Fam process. 30(11):37–54
Sclavi M (2003) Arte di ascoltare e mondi possibili; Come si esce dalle cornici di cui siamo parte. Paravia Bruno Mondadori Editore, Milano
Natoli S (2002) L’esperienza del dolore. Feltrinelli Editore, Milano
Terkelsen KG (1980) Toward a theory of family life cycle. In: Carter EA, McGoldrick M (eds) The family life cycle: a framework for family therapy. Gardner Press, New York
Bellani ML (2005) L’intervento psicologico sulla crisi. In: Morasso G, Tomamichel M (eds) La sofferenza psichica in oncologia. Modalità di intervento, Carocci, Roma, pp 79–90
Annunziata MA, Muzzatti B (2012) Psychosocial issues in cancer care. Neuropathological diseases 1:41–56
AA.VV. (2002). Psico-oncologia. Masson, Roma
Surbone A, Zwitter M, Rajer M, Stiefel R (eds.) (2013). New challenges in communication with cancer patients. Springer, New York
Sontag S. (1978). Illness as metaphor. Farrar, Straus & Girroux
Annunziata MA, Muzzatti B (2013) Improving communication effectiveness in oncology: the role of emotions. In: Surbone A, Zwitter M, Rajer M, Stiefel R (eds) New challenges in communication with cancer patients. Springer, New York, pp 235–246
Rogers C (1951) Client-centered therapy. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
Engel GL (1977) The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 196:119–136
Balint E (1969) The possibilities of patient-centered medicine. J R Coll Gen Pract. 17:269–276
Mead N, Bower P (2000) Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med 51:1087–1110
Charon R (2001). Narrative medicine: form, function and ethics. Ann Intern Med. 134(1)
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Ms Anna Vallerugo, MA, for her writing assistance.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Annunziata, M.A., Muzzatti, B. Cancer as an interruption in the plot: the contribution of the psychology in patients’ reframing their own narratives. J Med Pers 12, 51–54 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12682-014-0174-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12682-014-0174-5