Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Analysis of the Self-Compassion Scale

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Mindfulness Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 03 June 2017

Abstract

The present research investigated the construct validity and psychometric properties of the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) with a new and advanced statistical procedure, exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), in order to contribute to the ongoing discussion about its dimensionality by employing a bifactor-ESEM framework. A Hungarian online representative sample (N = 505, N female  = 265, M age  = 44.37) filled out the Hungarian version of the SCS. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and ESEM methods were employed, and first-order and bifactor solutions were examined and compared. The bifactor ESEM model demonstrated the best fit to the data with the joint presence of the general self-compassion factor and the specific factors. Internal consistency was adequate in all cases. Reliability indices—omega and omega hierarchical—showed that not all specific factors had unique contributions over and above the general factor. High levels of gender invariance were also achieved with females having lower general self-compassion and self-judgment latent means, while having higher self-kindness scores. The findings shed new light on the underlying theory behind the SCS and proved the usefulness of the bifactor ESEM framework in the investigation of multidimensional constructs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arens, A. K., & Morin, A. J. (2016). Examination of the structure and grade-related differentiation of multidimensional self-concept instruments for children using ESEM. The Journal of Experimental Education, 84(2), 330–355. doi:10.1080/00220973.2014.999187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arimitsu, K. (2014). Development and validation of the Japanese version of the self-compassion scale. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 85(1), 50–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 397–438. doi:10.1080/10705510903008204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azizi, A., Mohammadkhani, P., Lotfi, S., & Bahramkhani, M. (2013). The validity and reliability of the Iranian version of the self-compassion scale. Iranian Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2(3), 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandalos, D. L. (2014). Relative performance of categorical diagonally weighted least squares and robust maximum likelihood estimation. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(1), 102–116. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.859510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benda, J., & Reichová, A. (2016). [Psychometric characteritics of the Czech version of the self-compassion scale] Psychometrické charakteristiky české verze self-compassion scale (SCS-CZ). Československá psychologie., 60(2), 20–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bento, E., Xavier, S., Azevedo, J., Marques, M., Freitas, V., Soares, M. J., et al. (2016). Validation of the self-compassion scale in a community sample of Portuguese pregnant women. European Psychiatry, 33, S238. doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.01.598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, M., Nagy, G., & Wilhelm, O. (2012). A tutorial on hierarchically structured constructs. Journal of Personality, 80(4), 796–846. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00749.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caci, H., Morin, A. J., & Tran, A. (2015). Investigation of a bifactor model of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 24(10), 1291–1301. doi:10.1007/s00787-015-0679-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castilho, P., Pinto-Gouveia, J., & Duarte, J. (2015). Evaluating the multifactor structure of the long and short versions of the self-compassion scale in a clinical sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 71(9), 856–870. doi:10.1002/jclp.22187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Yan, L., & Zhou, L. (2011). Reliability and validity of Chinese version of self-compassion scale. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19(6), 734–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. F., Hayes, A., Carver, C. S., Laurenceau, J. P., & Zhang, Z. (2012). Modeling general and specific variance in multifaceted constructs: a comparison of the bifactor model to other approaches. Journal of Personality, 80(1), 219–251. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00739.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiorri, C., Marsh, H. W., Ubbiali, A., & Donati, D. (2016). Testing the factor structure and measurement invariance across gender of the big five inventory through exploratory structural equation modeling. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(1), 88–99. doi:10.1080/00223891.2015.1035381.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, J., Marôco, J., Pinto-Gouveia, J., Ferreira, C., & Castilho, P. (2015). Validation of the psychometric properties of the self-compassion scale. Testing the factorial validity and factorial invariance of the measure among borderline personality disorder, anxiety disorder, eating disorder and general populations. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. doi:10.1002/cpp.1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunha, M., Xavier, A., & Castilho, P. (2016). Understanding self-compassion in adolescents: validation study of the self-compassion scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 56–62. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Souza, L. K., & Hutz, C. S. (2016). Adaptation of the self-compassion scale for use in Brazil: evidences of construct validity. Trends in Psychology, 24(1), 159–172. doi:10.9788/TP2016.1-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deniz, M., Kesici, Ş., & Sümer, A. S. (2008). The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the self-compassion scale. Social Behavior and Personality, 36(9), 1151–1160. doi:10.2224/sbp.2008.36.9.1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dundas, I., Svendsen, J. L., Wiker, A. S., Granli, K. V., & Schanche, E. (2016). Self-compassion and depressive symptoms in a Norwegian student sample. Nordic Psychology, 68(1), 58–72. doi:10.1080/19012276.2015.1071203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, C., Pinto-Gouveia, J., & Duarte, C. (2013). Self-compassion in the face of shame and body image dissatisfaction: implications for eating disorders. Eating Behaviors, 14(2), 207–210. doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2013.01.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. D. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: a second course (pp. 269–314). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friis, A. M., Johnson, M. H., Cutfield, R. G., & Consedine, N. S. (2016). Kindness matters: a randomized controlled trial of a mindful self-compassion intervention improves depression, distress, and HbA1c among patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care, 39(11), 1963–1971. doi:10.2337/dc16-0416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Campayo, J., Navarro-Gil, M., Andrés, E., Montero-Marin, J., López-Artal, L., & Demarzo, M. M. P. (2014). Validation of the Spanish versions of the long (26 items) and short (12 items) forms of the self-compassion scale (SCS). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12(4), 1–9. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-12-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germer, C. K. (2009). The mindful path to self-compassion: freeing yourself from destructive thoughts and emotions. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guay, F., Morin, A. J. S., Litalien, D., Valois, P., & Vallerand, R. J. (2015). Application of exploratory structural equation modeling to evaluate the academic motivation scale. The Journal of Experimental Education, 83(1), 51–82. doi:10.1080/00220973.2013.876231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hupfeld, J., & Ruffieux, N. (2011). Validierung einer deutschen version der self-compassion scale (SCS-D) [validation of a German version of the self-compassion scale (SCS-D)]. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 40(2), 115–123. doi:10.1026/1616-3443/a000088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshanloo, M., & Lamers, S. M. (2016). Reinvestigation of the factor structure of the MHC-SF in the Netherlands: contributions of exploratory structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 8–12. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotsou, I., & Leys, C. (2016). Self-compassion scale (SCS): psychometric properties of the French translation and its relations with psychological well-being, affect and depression. PloS One, 11(4), e0152880. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152880.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, T., Altenstein, D., Baettig, I., Doerig, N., & Holtforth, M. G. (2013). Self-compassion in depression: associations with depressive symptoms, rumination, and avoidance in depressed outpatients. Behavior Therapy, 44(3), 501–513. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2013.04.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. R., Tate, E. B., Adams, C. E., Allen, A. B., & Hancock, J. (2007). Self-compassion and reactions to unpleasant self-relevant events: the implications of treating oneself kindly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 887–904. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.887.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W. K., & Lee, K. (2010). The validation study of the Korean version of the self-compassion scale with adult women in the community. Journal of the Korean Neuropsychiatric Association, 49, 193–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • López, A., Sanderman, R., Smink, A., Zhang, Y., van Sonderen, E., Ranchor, A., et al. (2015). A reconsideration of the self-compassion scale’s total score: self-compassion versus self-criticism. PloS One, 10(7), e0132940. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132940.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MacBeth, A., & Gumley, A. (2012). Exploring compassion: a meta-analysis of the association between self-compassion and psychopathology. Clinical Psychology Review, 32(6), 545–552. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2012.06.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maïano, C., Morin, A. J., Lanfranchi, M. C., & Therme, P. (2013). The eating attitudes test-26 revisited using exploratory structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41(5), 775–788. doi:10.1007/s10802-013-9718-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mantzios, M., Wilson, J. C., & Giannou, K. (2015). Psychometric properties of the Greek versions of the self-compassion and mindful attention and awareness scales. Mindfulness, 6(1), 123–132. doi:10.1007/s12671-013-0237-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320–341. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Grayson, D. (2005). Goodness of fit evaluation. In A. Maydeu-Olivares & J. McArdle (Eds.), Contemporary psychometrics (pp. 275–340). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A. J. S., & Trautwein, U. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: application to students’ evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 439–476. doi:10.1080/10705510903008220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A. J. S., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2010). A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22(3), 471–491. doi:10.1037/a0019227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Liem, G. A. D., Martin, A. J., Morin, A. J. S., & Nagengast, B. (2011). Methodological measurement fruitfulness of exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM): new approaches to key substantive issues in motivation and engagement. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(4), 322–346. doi:10.1177/0734282911406657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., & Morin, A. J. S. (2013). Measurement invariance of big-five factors over the life span: ESEM tests of gender, age, plasticity, maturity, and la dolce vita effects. Developmental Psychology, 49(6), 1194–1218. doi:10.1037/a0026913.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Morin, A. J. S., Parker, P. D., & Kaur, G. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: an integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 85–110. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543. doi:10.1007/BF02294825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, W., & Teresi, J. A. (2006). An essay on measurement and factorial invariance. Medical Care, 44(11), S69–S77. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000245438.73837.89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, A. J. S., & Maïano, C. (2011). Cross-validation of the short form of the physical self-inventory (PSI-S) using exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM). Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12(5), 540–554. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.04.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, A. J. S., Marsh, H. W., & Nagengast, B. (2013). Exploratory structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: a second course (pp. 395–436). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, A. J. S., Arens, A. K., Tran, A., & Caci, H. (2015). Exploring sources of construct-relevant multidimensionality in psychiatric measurement: a tutorial and illustration using the composite scale of morningness. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research. doi:10.1002/mpr.1485.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, A. J. S., Arens, A. K., & Marsh, H. W. (2016). A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of construct-relevant psychometric multidimensionality. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(1), 116–139. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.961800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muris, P., Otgaar, H., & Petrocchi, N. (2016). Protection as the mirror image of psychopathology: further critical notes on the self-compassion scale. Mindfulness, 7(3), 787–790. doi:10.1007/s12671-016-0509-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, K. D. (2003). The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2(3), 223–250. doi:10.1080/15298860309027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, K. D. (2011). Self-compassion, self-esteem, and well-being. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(1), 1–12. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00330.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, K. D. (2016a). The self-compassion scale is a valid and theoretically coherent measure of self-compassion. Mindfulness, 7(1), 264–274. doi:10.1007/s12671-015-0479-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, K. D. (2016b). Does self-compassion entail reduced self-judgment, isolation, and over-identification? A response to Muris, Otgaar, and Petrocchi (2016). Mindfulness, 7(3), 791–797. doi:10.1007/s12671-016-0531-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, K. D., & Germer, C. K. (2013). A pilot study and randomized controlled trial of the mindful self-compassion program. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69(1), 28–44. doi:10.1002/jclp.21923.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, K. D., Pisitsungkagarn, K., & Hsieh, Y. P. (2008). Self-compassion and self-construal in the United States, Thailand, and Taiwan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(3), 267–285. doi:10.1177/0022022108314544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrocchi, N., Ottaviani, C., & Couyoumdjian, A. (2014). Dimensionality of self-compassion: translation and construct validation of the self-compassion scale in an Italian sample. Journal of Mental Health, 23(2), 72–77. doi:10.3109/09638237.2013.841869.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raes, F. (2010). Rumination and worry as mediators of the relationship between self-compassion and depression and anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(6), 757–761. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reise, S. P. (2012). The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(5), 667–696. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.715555.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reise, S. P., Morizot, J., & Hays, R. D. (2007). The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures. Quality of Life Research, 16(1), 19–31. doi:10.1007/s11136-007-9183-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016). Evaluating bifactor models: calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods, 21(2), 137–150. doi:10.1037/met0000045.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 107–120. doi:10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, R. J. (2002). Toward a further understanding of and improvement in measurement invariance methods and procedures. Organizational Research Methods, 5(2), 139–158. doi:10.1177/1094428102005002001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. doi:10.1177/10944281003100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. J., Dalgleish, T., Karl, A., & Kuyken, W. (2014). Examining the factor structures of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire and the self-compassion scale. Psychological Assessment, 26(2), 407–418. doi:10.1037/a0035566.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yarnell, L. M., Stafford, R. E., Neff, K. D., Reilly, E. D., Knox, M. C., & Mullarkey, M. (2015). Meta-analysis of gender differences in self-compassion. Self and Identity, 14(5), 499–520. doi:10.1080/15298868.2015.1029966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, X., Wei, J., Oei, T. P., & Liu, X. (2016). The self-compassion scale is not validated in a Buddhist sample. Journal of Religion and Health, 55(1996), 1–14. doi:10.1007/s10943-016-0205-z.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zessin, U., Dickhäuser, O., & Garbade, S. (2015). The relationship between self-compassion and well-being: a meta-analysis. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 7(3), 340–364. doi:10.1111/aphw.12051.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The last author (GO) was supported by the Hungarian Research Fund (NKFI PD 106027, 116686) and the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (Lendület Project LP2012-36).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Doctoral School of Psychology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary

    István Tóth-Király & Beáta Bőthe

  2. Institute of Psychology, Eötvös Loránd University, Izabella utca 46, Budapest, H-1064, Hungary

    István Tóth-Király, Beáta Bőthe & Gábor Orosz

  3. Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary

    Gábor Orosz

Authors
  1. István Tóth-Király
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Beáta Bőthe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gábor Orosz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to István Tóth-Király.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and with the approval of the Institutional Review Board of the Eötvös Loránd University.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0754-6.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tóth-Király, I., Bőthe, B. & Orosz, G. Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Analysis of the Self-Compassion Scale. Mindfulness 8, 881–892 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0662-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0662-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation