Abstract
The notion of the brain as a predictive organ following Bayesian principles has been steadily gaining favor in neuroscience. This perspective, which has broad theoretical and applicative consequences, suggests also a novel way to look at the mind-body processes mobilized by meditative practices. In this article, the topic is introduced and subsequently explored as a conversation between a neuroscientist (GP) and the abbot of a Zen Sōtō monastery (FTG). We believe that such ‘mutual perturbations’ between the third-person descriptions provided by scientific research and the phenomenological depth of Buddhist lore have a great potential for advancing our understanding of both brain function and meditation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banich, M. T. (2009). Executive function: the search for an integrated account. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences, 18(2), 89–94.
Bene, C., & Deleuze, G. (2002). Sovrapposizioni: “Riccardo III” Di Carmelo Bene, “Un Manifesto Di Meno” Di Gilles Deleuze. Macerata: Quodlibet.
Bowker, R. M., & Morrison, A. R. (1976). The startle reflex and PGO spikes. Brain Research, 102(1), 185–190.
Braver, T. S. (2012). The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 106–113.
Cabral, J., Kringelbach, M. L., & Deco, G. (2014). Exploring the network dynamics underlying brain activity during rest. Progress in Neurobiology, 114, 102--131.
Cahn, B. R., & Polich, J. (2006). Meditation states and traits: EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies. Psychological Bullettin, 132(2), 180–211.
Colzato, L. S., Ozturk, A., & Hommel, B. (2012). Meditate to create: the impact of focused-attention and open-monitoring training on convergent and divergent thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 116.
Dietrich, A. (2003). Functional neuroanatomy of altered states of consciousness: the transient hypofrontality hypothesis. Consciousness and Cognition, 12(2), 231–256.
Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–138.
Friston, K., Thornton, C., & Clark, A. (2012). Free-energy minimization and the dark-room problem. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 130.
German, T. P., & Defeyter, M. A. (2000). Immunity to functional fixedness in young children. Psychonomic Bullettin and Review, 7(4), 707–712.
Guareschi, T. (2013). Fatti Di Nebbia. Padova, Italy: Casadeilibri.
Hobson, J. A., & Friston, K. J. (2012). Waking and dreaming consciousness: neurobiological and functional considerations. Progress in Neurobiology, 98(1), 82–98.
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Khachouf, O. T., Poletti, S., & Pagnoni, G. (2013). The embodied transcendental: a Kantian perspective on neurophenomenology. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 611. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00611.
Kim, H. J. (2004). Eihei Dogen: mystical realist. London: Wisdom Publications.
Kim, H. J. (2007). Dōgen on meditation and thinking: a reflection on his view of Zen. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Limb, C. J., & Braun, A. R. (2008). Neural substrates of spontaneous musical performance: an FMRI study of jazz improvisation. PLoS ONE, 3(2), e1679. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001679.
Lutz, A., & Thompson, E. (2003). Neurophenomenology integrating subjective experience and brain dynamics in the neuroscience of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10(9-10), 31–52.
Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: the realization of the living. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167–202.
Power, J. D., Schlaggar, B. L., & Petersen, S. E. (2014). Studying brain organization via spontaneous fMRI signal. Neuron, 84, 681--696.
Rodriguez, E., George, N., Lachaux, J. P., Martinerie, J., Renault, B., & Varela, F. J. (1999). Perception’s shadow: long-distance synchronization of human brain activity. Nature, 397(6718), 430–433.
Sadaghiani, S., Hesselmann, G., Friston, K. J., & Kleinschmidt, A. (2010). The relation of ongoing brain activity, evoked neural responses, and cognition. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 4. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2010.00020.
Slingerland, E. (2003). Effortless action: Wu-Wei as conceptual metaphor and spiritual idea in early China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Slingerland, E. (2014). Trying not to try: the art and science of spontaneity. New York: Crown Publishers.
Stout, D. (2010). The evolution of cognitive control. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(4), 614–630.
Thompson-Schill, S. L., Ramscar, M., & Chrysikou, E. G. (2009). Cognition without control: when a little frontal lobe goes a long way. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 259–263.
Varela, F. J. (1996). Neurophenomenology: a methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3(4), 330–349.
Varela, F. J. (1999). The specious present: a neurophenomenology of time consciousness. In B. Pachoud, J. Petitot, & F. J. Varela (Eds.), Naturalizing phenomenology: issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science (pp. 266–314). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to express their gratitude to Tiziana Verde and Omar T. Khachouf for joining the original conversations from which the present article was produced, and for providing their insightful feedback on the early draft of the manuscript. GP would also like to thank Wendy Hasenkamp for her collaboration on an editorial piece for the Mind & Life Institute, where some of these ideas presented here were first discussed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pagnoni, G., Guareschi, F.T. Remembrance of things to come: a conversation between Zen and neuroscience on the predictive nature of the mind. Mindfulness 8, 27–37 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-015-0438-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-015-0438-z