Abstract
Spatialisations, the products of rendering non-spatial concepts in (typically, map and landscape) spatial representations, have been effectively applied to news stories and project workload. The latter has previously been implemented in a Virtual Geographic Environment (VGE) using a landscape metaphor. This was done by translating the work attributes of duration to landscape area and difficulty to the height of elevated features in the landscape, to produce a simple scene. This work proposes and implements an extension of the workload 2.5D terrain surface (landscape) based on the additional work attributes of project uncertainty (translating to terrain roughness), and relative importance of the project (translating to centrality of the project area in the entire scene). Importantly, each project is divided into subtasks, each possessing its own duration, difficulty, certainty and importance which translates into a correspondingly more detailed and realistic hill in the virtual environment. This implementation visualizes projects and their subtasks as ‘islands’ with ‘hills’, each generated from objectively-defined (duration and definition of subtasks) and subjective (difficulty, certainty, importance) data. Results on several types of data (workload-related and non-workload related) are presented to demonstrate the data independence of the closed computational algorithm. This represents a novel application for the VGE, featuring a non-specific naïve geography rather than the usual specific virtual environment that is tied to a real location. Finally, limitations to the computational method are reported on and proposals for future development are presented (e.g. the modelling of semantic proximity of projects).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bertin J (1983) Semiology of graphics. Esri Press, Redlands, CA
Cammack RG (2003) Cartography, virtual reality, and the internet: integrating abstract models of the environment via the internet. In: Peterson M (ed) Maps and the Internet. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 359–370
Che W, Lin H, Hu M, Lin T (2014) Reality–virtuality fusional avatar-based noise measurement and visualization in online virtual geographic environment. Ann GIS 20(2):109–115
Chen M, Lin H, Hu M, He L, Zhang C (2013) Real geographic-scenario-based virtual social environments: integrating geography with social research. Environ Plan B Plan Des 40(6):1103–1121
Chernoff H (1973) The use of faces to represent points in k-dimensional space graphically. J Am Stat Assoc 68(342):361–368
Crutcher LA, Lazar AA, Feiner SK, Zhou MX (1995) Managing networks through a virtual world. IEEE Parallel Distrib Technol 1995:4–13
Fabrikant SI (2001) Visualizing region and scale in information spaces. In: Proceedings of 20th international cartographic conference, ICC 2001, pp 2522–2529
Fabrikant S, Skupin A (2005) Cognitively plausible information visualisation. In: Dykes J, MacEachren A, Kraak M-J (eds) Exploring geovisualisation. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 667–690
Fillatreau P, Fourquet J-Y, le Bolloc’h R, Caihol S, Data A, Puel B (2013) Using virtual reality and 3D industrial numerical models for immersive interactive checklists. Comput Ind 64(9):1253–1262
Forsyth P (2013) Successful time management, 3rd edn. Kogan Page, London
Germanchis T, Cartwright W, Pettit C (2007) Virtual queenscliff: a computer game approach for depicting geography. In: Cartwright W, Peterson M, Gartner G (eds) Multimedia cartography, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 359–368
Gong J, Lin H (2006) Collaborative virtual geographic environment. In: Balram S, Dragicevic S (eds) Collaborative geographic information systems. IGI Global, Hershey PA, pp 186–207
Goodchild MF, Mark DM (1987) The fractal nature of geographic phenomena. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 77(2):265–278
Hägerstrand T (1970) What about people in regional science? Pap Region Sci Assoc 24:7–24
Halpin H, Zielinski DJ, Brady R, Kelly G (2008) Exploring semantic social networks using virtual reality. In: Sheth A et al (eds), ISWC 2008, LNCS 5318, pp 599–614
Hudson-Smith A (2008) The visual city. In: Dodge M, McDerby M, Turner M (eds) Geographic visualization –concepts, tools and applications. Wiley, Chichester, pp 183–197
International Standards Association (ISO) (1998) ISO 9241-11:1998—ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) — Part 11: guidance on usability. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-11:ed-1:v1:en. Accessed 30 May 2015
Kohonen T (2001) Self-organizing maps. Springer, Berlin
Kraak M (2003) The space-time cube revisited from a geovisualisation perspective. In: Proceedings of the 21st international cartographic conference (ICC) Durban, South Africa, 10–16 Aug 2003, pp 1988–1996
Laurini R, Thompson D (1992) Fundamentals of spatial information systems. Academic Press, Waltham, MA
Lin H, Zhu J, Gong J, Xu B, Qi H (2010) A grid-based collaborative virtual geographic environment for the planning of silt dam systems. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 24(4):607–621
Lin H, Chen M, Lu G, Zhu Q, Gong J, You X, Wen Y, Xu B, Hu M (2013a) Virtual geographic environments (VGEs): a new generation of geographic analysis tool. Earth Sci Rev 126:74–84
Lin H, Chen M, Lu G (2013b) Virtual geographic environment: a workspace for computer-aided geographic experiments. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 103(3):465–482
Lopes CV, Lindstrom C (2012) Virtual cities in Urban planning: the uppsala case study. J Theor Appl Electron Commer Res 7(3):88–100
Lu GN (2011) Geographic analysis-oriented virtual geographic environment: framework, structure and functions. Sci Chin Earth Sci 54(5):733–743
MacEachren AM (1992) Visualizing uncertain information. Cartogr Perspect 13(Fall):10–19
Mandelbrot BB (1983) The fractal geometry of nature. WH Freeman and Co, New York 495
Meng L (2009) Affordance and reflex level of geovisualization. In: Lin H, Batty M (eds) Virtual geographic environments, pp 136–150
Moore AB, Bricker M (2015) “Mountains of work”: spatialisation of work projects in a virtual geographic environment. Ann GIS. doi:10.1080/19475683.2015.1057227
Okabe A, Boots B, Sugihara K (1992) Spatial tessellations. Concepts and applications of Voronoi diagrams. Wiley, New York
OpenSimulator (2015) OpenSimulator. http://opensimulator.org. Accessed 30 May 2015
Romero M (2009) Time awareness tool for enhancing group times’ coordination in the virtual workspace. In: Schneider M et al (eds) Workshop proceedings of the 5th international conference on intelligent environments, pp 333–337
Sacks R, Gurevich U, Belaciano B (2015) Hybrid discrete event simulation and virtual reality experimental setup for construction management research. J Comput Civil Eng 29:1. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000366
Sampaio AZ, Martins OP (2014) The application of virtual reality technology in the construction of bridge: the cantilever and incremental launching methods. Auto Constr 37:58–67
Second Life-Linden Research Inc. (2015) Second life official site—virtual worlds, avatars, free 3D chat. http://secondlife.com. Accessed 30 May 2015
Skupin A, Agarwal P (2008) Introduction: what is a self-organizing map? In: Agarwal P, Skupin A (eds) Self-organizing maps: applications in geographic information science. Wiley, Chichester, pp 1–20
Smith B, Mark D (2001) Geographical categories: an ontological investigation. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 15(7):591–612
Tózsa I (2014) The architecture of 3D administration. Public Admin Res 3(1):68–79
Wysocki RK (2009) Effective project management: traditional, agile, extreme. Wiley, New York
Zhang S, Moore AB (2014) The usability of online geographic virtual reality. In: Isikdag U (ed) Innovations in 3D geo-information sciences. Springer, Switzerland, pp 225–242
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the lecturers at the School of Surveying who provided workload parameters for generic components of taught university papers. We would also like to thank Peter George in the Department of Information Science at the University of Otago for maintaining the OpenSimulator virtual world grid.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rußwurm, M., Moore, A. “Visualising the project landscape”: a spatialisation describing workload attributes as terrain. Environ Earth Sci 74, 7159–7172 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4757-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4757-0