Abstract
This paper aims at presenting the opinion of the population (and especially of the tourists) about the natural and anthropogenic hazards affecting the geomorphological heritage of the central area of the Bucegi Mts. Our scientific approach is intended to raise the awareness of the authorities and tourists as well with regard to the degradation hazard of the geomorphological heritage through uncontrolled tourism activities, so that the management team of the Bucegi Mountains Natural Park can take the most appropriate measures for its preservation and protection. The study area belongs to the central section of the Bucegi massif, a realm characterized by many types of landforms and shaping processes, with many geomorphosites, which create a particularly valuable geomorphological heritage. The investigation relied on a sample of 158 tourists, whose perception was assessed based on a specific questionnaire. The general finding is that most tourists are familiar with the geomorphological heritage of this area, but few of them are aware of the existing hazards and especially of their long-term effects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armaş I (2008) Percepţia riscului natural: cutremure, inundaţii, alunecări de teren. Edit. Universităţii, Bucureşti
Bady JP (1995) Patrimoine culturel, patrimoine naturel. Ecole Nationale du Patrimoine, Paris
Bickerstaff K (2004) Risk perception research: socio-cultural perspectives on the public experience of air pollution. Environ Int. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2003.12.001
Bland SH, O’Leary ES, Farinaro E, Jossa F, Trevisan M (1996) Long-term psychological effects of natural disasters. Psychosom Med 58:18–24
Brandolini P, Faccini F, Maifredi A, Benedettini A (2012) Geomorphological hazard and cultural heritage: a case-study of the Roman bridges in the Finalese karstic area (Western Liguria-Italy). Disaster Adv 5:79–86
Cannon T, Davis I (2004) At risk: natural hazards people’s vulnerability and disasters. Routledge, London
Ceobanu C, Grozavu A (2009) Psychosocial effects of the floods perception and attitudes. Carpathian J Earth Environ Sci 4:25–38
Chesney PES, Cannibal GL, Baines R (2002) The development of a new holistic assessment model for the inclusion of public perceptual values in the decision-making process. Risk Anal. doi:10.2495/RISK020171
Cheval S (2003) Percepţia hazardelor naturale. Rezultatele unui sondaj de opinie desfăşurat în România (octombrie 2001–decembrie 2002). Riscuri şi catastrofe 2:49–59
Comănescu L, Dobre R (2012) Harta geoturistică a Munţilor Bucegi. Edit. Ars Docendi, Bucureşti
Comănescu L, Nedelea A (2010) Analysis of some representative geomorphosites in the Bucegi Mountains: between scientific evaluation and tourist perception. Area. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00937.x
Comănescu L, Ielenicz M, Nedelea A (2010) Relieful şi valorificarea lui în turism. Edit. Ars Docendi, Bucureşti
Conţiu A, Conţiu HV (2007) Percepţia riscurilor induse de inundaţii. Rezultatul unui sondaj de opinie desfăşurat în oraşele din bazinul Târnavei. Riscuri şi catastrofe 4:179–188
Cutter SL (2001) The changing nature of risk and hazards: American hazardscapes: the regionalization of hazards and disasters. Joseph Henry Press, Washington
Galadini F, Ceccaroni E, Falcucci E, Gori S (2012) Natural hazards in the Abruzzi Apennines (Italy) and the risk to archaeological sites. Disaster Adv 5:72–79
Gizzi FT, Lazzari M (2012) Geological risks and cultural heritage safeguard. Disaster Adv 5:3–4
Heijmans A (2001) Vulnerability—a matter of perception disaster management working paper IV. Benfield Grey Hazard Research Center, London
http://portal.unesco.org/en. Accessed 20 Jul 2014
https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=740629. Accessed 20 Jul 2014
Ilieş D, Josan N (2009) Geosituri şi geopeisaje. Edit. Universităţii din Oradea, Oradea
Jokilehto J (2005) Definition of cultural heritage—references to documents in history. ICCROM Working Group ‘Heritage and Society, Roma
Knowles DJ (2002) Risk perception leading to risk taking behaviour amongst farmers in England and Wales. HSE, Norwich
Lazzari M, Lazzari S (2012) Geological and geomorphological hazard in historical and archaeological sites of the mediterranean area: knowledge, forecasting and mitigation. Disaster Adv 5:63–72
Lazzari M, Danese M, Delli Santi M (2010) Integrated methods to define the cultural heritage risk map: the sample area of Laurenzana historical centre (Basilicata, southern Italy). Proceedings of the international conference on “mountain risks: bringing science to society”, pp 381–386
Lei Y, Xuegong X (2010) Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental system from the perspective of hazard, sensitivity, and resilience: a case study of Beijing, China. Environ Earth Sci 61(6):1179–1186
Loewenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch N (2001) Risk as feelings. Psychol Bull. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267
Marthaler M (2003) Le memoire de la Terre cachee derriere les panoramas. Géomorphologie et tourisme 24:105–114
Mihai B, Reynard E, Werren G, Săvulescu I, Şandric I, Chiţu Z (2009) Impacts of tourism on geomorphological processes în the Bucegi Mountains in Romania. Geogr Helv Swiss J Geogr 3:134–148
Panizza M, Piacente S (2003) Geomorfologia culturale. Pitagora Editrice, Bologna
Patrulius D (1969) Geologia masivului Bucegi şi a culoarului Dâmbovicioarei. Edit. Academiei, Bucureşti
Sjöberg L (2000) Factors in risk perception. Risk Anal. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.00001
Sjöberg L, Moen BE, Rundmo T (2004) Explaining risk perception. An evaluation of the psychometric paradigm in risk perception research. Rotunde Publikasjoner, Trondheim
Smith K (2001) Environmental hazard: assessing risk and reducing disaster. Routledge, London
Velcea V (1961) Masivul Bucegi-studiu geomorfologic. Edit. Academiei, Bucureşti
Weber EU, Blais AR, Betz NE (2002) A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. J Behav Decis Mak. doi:10.1002/bdm.414
Acknowledgments
The present contribution is part of the research project PNII/Idei (Inventorying, evaluating and mapping of the geomorphosites. Case studies: the Dobrogea Tableland and the South Carpathians) financed by NURC (National University Research Council). We want to thank our colleague Dr. Robert Dobre for his support in accomplishing the graphical part of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Comănescu, L., Nedelea, A. Public perception of the hazards affecting geomorphological heritage—case study: the central area of Bucegi Mts. (Southern Carpathians, Romania). Environ Earth Sci 73, 8487–8497 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-4007-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-4007-x