Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Management of colon stents based on Bernoulli’s principle

  • Theoretical Medicine
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Aims

The colonic self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) has been widely used for “bridge to surgery” and palliative therapy. However, if the spread of SEMS is insufficient, not only can a decompression effect not be obtained but also perforation and obstructive colitis can occur. The mechanism of occurrence of obstructive colitis and perforation was investigated by flow dynamics.

Methods

Bernoulli’s principle was applied, assuming that the cause of inflammation and perforation represented the pressure difference in the proximal lumen and stent. The variables considered were proximal lumen diameter, stent lumen diameter, flow rate into the proximal lumen, and fluid density. To model the right colon, the proximal lumen diameter was set at 50 mm. To model the left-side colon, the proximal lumen diameter was set at 30 mm.

Results

For both the right colon model and the left-side colon model, the difference in pressure between the proximal lumen and the stent was less than 20 mmHg, when the diameter of the stent lumen was 14 mm or more. Both the right colon model and the left-side colon model were 30 mmHg or more at 200 mL s−1 when the stent lumen was 10 mm or less. Even with an inflow rate of 90–110 mL s−1, the pressure was 140 mmHg when the stent lumen diameter was 5 mm.

Conclusion

In theory, in order to maintain the effectiveness of SEMS, it is necessary to keep the diameter of the stent lumen at 14 mm or more.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chang HK, Min BS, Ko YT, et al. Obstructive colitis proximal to obstructive colorectal carcinoma. Asian J Surg. 2009;32:26–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Saegesser F, Sandblom P. Ischemic lesions of the distended colon. A complication of obstructive colorectal cancer. Am J Surg. 1975;129:309–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ko GY, Ha HK, Lee HJ, et al. Usefulness of CT in patients with ischemic colitis proximal to colonic cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168:951–6.

  4. Fukita Y, Ishibashi H, Adachi S, et al. Obstructive colitis following the ingestion of laxatives during bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a report of two cases. Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi. 2015;112:1674–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tejero E, Mainar A, Fernandez L, Tobio R, de Gregorio MA. New procedure for the treatment of colorectal neoplastic obstructions. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:1158–9.

  6. Baron TH. Expandable metal stents for the treatment of cancerous obstruction of the gastrointestinal tract. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1681–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. de Gregorio MA, Mainar A, Rodriguez J, et al. Colon stenting: a review. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2004;21:205–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim EJ, Kim YJ. Stents for colorectal obstruction: past, present, and future. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:842–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Matsuzawa T, Ishida H, Yoshida S, et al. A Japanese prospective multicenter study of self-expandable metal stent placement for malignant colorectal obstruction: short-term safety and efficacy within 7 days of stent procedure in 513 cases. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82:697–707.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Malgras B, Lo Dico R, Pautrat K, et al. Gastrointestinal stenting: current status and imaging features. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2015;96:593–606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Haraguchi N, Ikeda M, Miyake M, et al. Colonic stenting as a bridge to surgery for obstructive colorectal cancer: advantages and disadvantages. Surg Today. 2016;46:1310–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim JS, Lee KM, Kim SW, et al. Preoperative colonoscopy through the colonic stent in patients with colorectal cancer obstruction. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:10570–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Cook IJ, Furukawa Y, Panagopoulos V, Collins PJ, Dent J. Relationships between spatial patterns of colonic pressure and individual movements of content. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2000;278:G329–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith AN, Shepherd J, Eastwood MA. Pressure changes after balloon distension of the colon wall in diverticular disease. Gut. 1981;22:841–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Grady MR, Slocombe JO. An investigation of variables in a fecal flotation technique. Can J Comp Med. 1980;44:148–57.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Srivastava A, Sood A, Joy SP, Woodcock J. Principles of physics in surgery: the laws of flow dynamics physics for surgeons—Part 1. Indian J Surg. 2009;71:182–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Srivastava A, Sood A, Joy PS, et al. Principles of physics in surgery: the laws of mechanics and vectors physics for surgeons-part 2. Indian J Surg. 2010;72:355–61.

  18. Rajkumar JS, Chopra P, Chintamani. Basic physics revisited for a surgeon. Indian J Surg. 2015;77:169–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Maykel JA, Opelka FG. Colonic diverticular hemorrhage. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2004;17:195–204.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sheth AA, Longo W, Floch MH. Diverticular disease and diverticulitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:1550–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Slam KD, Calkins S, Cason FD. LaPlace’s law revisited: cecal perforation as an unusual presentation of pancreatic carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol. 2007;5:14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Farag A. Use of the Hagen-Poiseuille law: a new mathematical approach for the integration and evaluation of anorectal physiological testing in patients with faecal incontinence and pelvic dyschezia and in normal controls. Eur Surg Res. 1998;30:79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Uno Y, van Velkinburgh JC. Logical hypothesis: low FODMAP diet to prevent diverticulitis. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2016;7:503–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Schmidt E, Ros M, Moyse E, Lorthois S, Swider P. Bernoulli’s principle applied to brain fluids: intracranial pressure does not drive cerebral perfusion or CSF flow. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2016;122:107–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bhardwaj A, Sharma MK, Gupta M. Endoscopic evaluation of therapeutic effects of “Anuloma-Viloma Pranayama” in Pratishyaya w.s.r. to mucociliary clearance mechanism and Bernoulli’s principle. Ayu. 2013;34:361–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen HC, Gupta A, Wiek J, Kohner EM. Retinal blood flow in nonischemic central retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:772–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hess DR, Fink JB, Venkataraman ST, et al. The history and physics of heliox. Respir Care. 2006;51:608–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Suratt PM, Dee P, Atkinson RL, et al. Fluoroscopic and computed tomographic features of the pharyngeal airway in obstructive sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1983;127:487–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sadun AA, Heller KB, Feldon SE. Model for optic nerve sheath decompression: Bernoulli’s principle applied. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:612–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kumon H, Ozawa H, Nose H, et al. Basic study on velocity-flow urodynamics using Doppler sonography: simultaneous detection of cavitation and Doppler signals in an artificial urethral model. Int J Urol. 2004;11:628–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Burkhart SS, Danaceau SM, Athanasiou KA. Turbulence control as a factor in improving visualization during subacromial shoulder arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2001;17:209–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Uno Y, Munakata A. The non-lifting sign of invasive colon cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;40:485–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dencker H, Lingårdh G, Muth T, et al. Massive gangrene of the colon secondary to carcinoma of the rectum. Case report Acta Chir Scand. 1969;135:357–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Boley SJ, Girdhar PA. Pathophysiologic effects of bowel distension on intestinal blood flow. Am J Surg. 1969;117:228–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Woltjen JA. A retrospective analysis of cecal barotrauma caused by colonoscope air flow and pressure. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:37–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Iwashita A, Kuroiwa S, Enjoji M, Watanabe H. Pathologic study of ischemic colitis and obstructive colitis. J Jpn Soc Coloproctol. 1981;34:599–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshiharu Uno.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Uno Y declares no conflicts of interest in relation to the publication of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uno, Y. Management of colon stents based on Bernoulli’s principle. Indian J Gastroenterol 36, 69–74 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-017-0734-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-017-0734-8

Keywords

Navigation