Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of Auricular Cartilage for Closure of Oroantral Fistula: A Prospective Clinical Study

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The term oro-antral fistula is understood to mean of fistular canal covered with epithelia which may or may not be filled with granulation tissue or polyposis of the sinus mucous membrane. With the presence of a fistula the sinus is permanently open, which enables the passage of microbial flora of the oral cavity into the maxillary sinus and the occurrence of inflammation with all possible consequences. Every now and then various researchers have proposed innumerable techniques to treat this defect. Starting from simple tissue flaps to autogenous grafts to alloplastic materials, an array of procedures have been evaluated in literature but the most promising technique still needs to be evaluated. Consequently, after reviewing an array of such procedures, our present study focussed on a new technique for the closer of oro-antral fistulas using autogenous auricular cartilage graft supported by buccal advancement flap.

Material and method

A total of 20 patients of oro-antral fistula were included in the study and after excising the fistular tract a double layer closure was done by placing auricular cartilage over the defect followed by buccal mucoperiosteal flap. The graft was harvested using posterior auricular approach. Assessment of patients was done at the end of 1 week, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months.

Conclusion

We found that the autogenous auricular cartilage graft is an effective sealing material in oro-antral fistula closure. We recommend this technique for the defect size ≤10 mm2 in which future dental implant placement is sought as it allows easy sinus lifting procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sokler K, Vuksan V, Lauc T (2002) Treatment of oroantral fistula. Acta Stomatol Croat 36(1):135–140

    Google Scholar 

  2. Borgonovo AE, Berardinelli FV, Favale M, Maiorana C (2012) Surgical options in oroantral fistula treatment. Open Dent J 6:94–98

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Von Wowern N (1971) Oro-antral communications and displacements of roots into the maxillary sinus: a followup of 231 cases. J Oral Surg 29(9):622–627

    Google Scholar 

  4. Punwutikorn J, Waikakul A, Pairuchvej V (1994) Clinically significant oroantral communications—a study of incidence and site. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 23:19–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Guven O (1998) A clinical study on oroantral fistulae. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 26:267–271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin PT, Bukachaevsky R, Blake M (1991) Management of odontogenic sinusitis with persistent oro-antral fistula. Ear Nose Throat J 70:488–490

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hanazawa Y, Itoh K, Mabashi T, Sato K (1995) Closure of oroantral communications using a pedicled buccal fat pad graft. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53(7):771–776

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Poeschl PW, Baumann A, Russmueller G, Poeschl E, Klug C et al (2009) Closure of oroantral communications with Bichat’s buccal fat pad. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:1460–1466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee JJ, Kok SH, Chang HH, Yang PJ, Hahn LJ et al (2002) Repair of oroantral communications in the third molar region by random palatal flap. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 31:677–680

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kitagawa Y, Sano K, Nakamura M, Ogasawara T (2003) Use of third molar transplantation for closure of the oroantral communication after tooth extraction: a report of 2 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Radiol Endod 95:409–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ogunsalu C (2005) A new surgical management for oro-antral communication. The resorbable guided tissue regeneration membrane—bone substitute sandwich technique. West Indian Med J 54(4):261–263

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Saleh EA, Issa IA (2013) Closure of large oroantral fistulas using septal cartilage. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 148(6):1048–1050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berger A (1939) Oroantral openings and their surgical corrections. Arch Otolaryngol 130:400–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Martensson G (1957) Operative method in fistulas to the maxillary sinus. Acta Otolaryngol 48:253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Edgerton M, Zoviekian T (1956) Reconstruction of major defects of the palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 17:105–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Guerrero-Santos J, Altamirano JT (1966) The use of lingual flaps in repair of fistulas of the hard palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 38:123–128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Isler SC, Demircan S, Cansiz E (2011) Closure of oroantral fistula using auricular cartilage: a new method to repair an oroantral fistula. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49:86–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gagan Mehta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ram, H., Makadia, H., Mehta, G. et al. Use of Auricular Cartilage for Closure of Oroantral Fistula: A Prospective Clinical Study. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 15, 293–299 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-015-0841-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-015-0841-y

Keywords

Navigation