Abstract
Purpose
Osseointegrated skin-penetrating implants enhance the retention and stability of the craniofacial prostheses and provide the long-term comfort. However, to determine the implant locations is a great challenge facing the surgeon. Implants may either be located in conventional manner or by STL generated surgical guides.
Materials and Methods
Present study reports the CT based 3D virtual modeling, preoperative virtual planning and the implant placement by using a STL surgical guide, in an anotia case.
Results
Employed materials and the methods facilitated the implant surgery while improving the operational security.
Conclusions
CT based 3D virtual modeling of the surgical site, determining the implant locations virtually and the STL guided placement of the craniofacial implants, were found useful applications in order to facilitating the surgical intervention and providing prevention from complications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Federspil PA (2009) Implant-retained craniofacial prostheses for facial defects. Laringorhinootologie 88(Suppl 1):125–138
Gentile P, Bottini DJ, Colicchia GM, Trimarco A, Cervelli V (2008) Burns: bone-anchored, extra-oral implantology. J Burn Care Res 29:627–631
Nanda A, Jain V, Kumar R, Kabra K (2011) Implant supported auricular prosthesis. Indian J Dent Res 22:152–156
Somers T, De Cubber J, Govaerts P, Offeciers FE (1998) Total auricular repair: bone anchored prosthesis or plastic reconstruction? Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 52:317–327
Pravinkumar G, Patil MDS (2010) Modified technique to fabricate a hollow light-weight facial prosthesis for lateral midfacial defect: a clinical report. J Adv Prosthodont 2:65–70
Padmanabhan TV, Mohamed K, Parameswari D, Nitin SK (2012) Prosthetic rehabilitation of an orbital and facial defect: a clinical report. J Prosthodont 21:200–204
Nagaraj E, Shetty M, Krishna PD (2011) Definitive magnetic nasal prosthesis for partial nasal defect. Indian J Dent Res 22:597–599
Shaikh SR, Patil PG, Puri S (2011) A modified technique for retention of orbital prosthesis. Indian J Dent Res 22:863–865
Jain S, Maru K, Shukla J, Vyas A, Pillai R, Jain P (2011) Nasal prosthesis rehabilitation: a case report. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 11:265–269
Ciocca L, Maremonti P, Bianchi B, Scotti R (2007) Maxillofacial rehabilitation after rhinectomy using two different treatment options: clinical reports. J Oral Rehabil 34:311–315
Ciocca L, Fantini M, De Crescenzio F, Persiani F, Scotti R (2010) New protocol for construction of eyeglasses supported provisional nasal prosthesis using CAD/CAM techniques. J Rehabil Res Dev 47:595–604
Hatamleh MM, Haylock C, Watson J, Watts DC (2010) Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation in the UK: a survey of maxillofacial prosthetists’ and technologists’ attitudes and opinions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39:1186–1192
Kiat-amnuay S, Waters PJ, Roberts D, Gettleman L (2008) Adhesive retention of silicone and chlorinated polyethylene for maxillofacial prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 99:483–488
Hecker DM (2003) Maxillofacial rehabilitation of a large facial defect resulting from an arteriovenous malformation utilizing a two-piece prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 89:109–113
Akman S, Kalayci A, Ataoğlu H, Aykent F (2011) Complex midfacial reconstruction with an implant-supported framework. J Craniofac Surg 22:724–726
Leonardi A, Buonaccorsi S, Pellacchia V, Moricca LM, Indrizzi E, Fini G (2008) Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation using extraoral implants. J Craniofac Surg 19:398–405
Karakoca S, Aydin C, Yilmaz H, Bal BT (2010) Retrospective study of treatment outcomes with implant-retained extraoral prostheses: survival rates and prosthetic complications. J Prosthet Dent 103:118–126
Federspil PA (2010) Auricular prostheses. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 68:65–80
Mello MC, Piras JA, Takimoto RM, Cervantes O, Abraão M, Dib LL (2012) Facial reconstruction with a bone-anchored prosthesis following destructive cancer surgery. Oncol Lett 4:682–684
Postema N, van Waas MA, van Lokven J (1994) Procedure for fabrication of an implant-supported auricular prosthesis. J Invest Surg 7:305–320
Charpiot A, Chambres O, Herve JF, Million P, Riedinger AM, Hemar P (2006) Osteointegrated cranio-facial implants: 49 patients report. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol 127:217–222
Konstantinović VS, Lazić VM, Stefan I (2010) Nasal epithesis retained by basal (disk) implants. J Craniofac Surg 21:33–36
Toljanic JA, Eckert SE, Roumanas E, Beumer J, Huryn JM, Zlotolow IM, Reisberg DJ, Habakuk SW, Wriht RF, Rubenstein JE, Schneid TR, Mulasseril P, Garcia LT, Bedard JF, Choi YG (2005) Osseointegrated craniofacial implants in the rehabilitation of orbital defects: an update of a retrospective experience in the United States. J Prosthet Dent 94:177–182
Gurbuz A, Kalkan M, Ozturk AN, Eskitascioglu G (2004) Nasal prosthesis rehabilitation: a case report. Quintessence Int 35:655–656
Guttal SS, Patil NP, Thakur S, Kumar S, Kulkarni SS (2009) Implant-retained nasal prosthesis for a patient following partial rhinectomy: a clinical report. J Prosthodont 18:353–358
Kurtulmus H, Cotert HS, Guneri P (2009) CT-based planning and 3-D modeling for craniofacial implant placement: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24:943–946
Federspil PA (2010) Craniofacial prostheses for facial defects. HNO 58:621–631
Klein M, Hein A, Lueth T, Bier J (2003) Robot-assisted placement of craniofacial implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18:712–718
Cheng AC, Morrison D, Cho RS, Archibald D (1998) Vacuum-formed matrix as a guide for the fabrication of craniofacial implant tissue bar-retained auricular prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 79:711–714
Coward TJ, Watson RM, Wilkinson IC (1999) Fabrication of a wax ear by rapid-process modeling using stereolithography. Int J Prosthodont 12:20–27
Germec-Cakan D, Canter HI, Nur B, Arun T (2010) Comparison of facial soft tissue measurements on three-dimensional images and models obtained with different methods. J Craniofac Surg 21:1393–1399
Cheah CM, Chua CK, Tan KH (2003) Integration of lazer surface digitizing with CAD/CAM techniques for developing facial prostheses. Part 2: development of molding techniques for casting prosthetic parts. Int J Prosthodont 16:543–548
Kling-Petersen T, Rydmark M (2000) Modeling and modification of medical 3D objects. The benefit of using a haptic modeling tool. Stud Health Technol Inform 70:162–167
Norton MR, Gamble C (2001) Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clin Oral Implants Res 12:79–84
Reitemeier B, Notni G, Heinze M, Schöne C, Schmidt A, Fichtner D (2004) Optical modeling of extraoral defects. J Prosthet Dent 91:80–84
Alfano SG, Robinson RF, Webber CM, Erickson KK (2005) Fabrication of a craniofacial implant: surgical and treatment planning guide. J Prosthet Dent 93:91–94
Verdonck HWD, Poukens J, Overveld HV, Riediger D (2003) Computer assisted maxillofacial prosthodontics: a new treatment protocol. Int J Prosthodont 16:326–328
Girod S, Keeve E, Girod B (1995) Advances in interactive craniofacial surgery planning by 3D simulation and visualization. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 24:120–125
Acknowledgments
Authors would like to thank Mr. Murat Eğri from 4C Medikal Ltd (Esenler, İstanbul, Turkey) for his kind collaboration.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Çötert, H.S., Yılmaz, M. Bone and Skin-Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides for Cranio-Facial Implant Placement. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 15, 76–81 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-015-0804-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-015-0804-3