Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Using Biomass for Pig Iron Production: A Technical, Environmental and Economical Assessment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Waste and Biomass Valorization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The classical route for iron- and steel-making today is based on massive use of fossil coal, which is responsible for most of the large CO2 emissions of the steel industry. Biomass, as a renewable carbon resource, is a good candidate to substitute for fossil coal and even partial substitution could lead to a significant reduction in CO2 emissions. Depending on the type of biomass, its processing, and the way it is used in the iron making process, many different scenarios may be considered. Those scenarios should be evaluated and compared from technical, environmental, and economical points of view in order to figure out the best options. The case of a real pig iron plant located in the North East of France was investigated. First, we checked the relevance of various biomass options on the basis of the biomass availability around the plant and of the technical requirements of the processes. Then, we carried out a screening life cycle assessment focusing on global warming impacts and following a cradle-to-gate approach. Different biomass-based pig iron production scenarios were compared. The results showed that for a 20 % substitution of biomass for coke, around 300 kg of CO2-equivalent per ton of pig iron produced could be saved, which represents a reduction of 15 % in the total greenhouse gas emissions. Finally, a brief economic evaluation of the resulting scenarios was performed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. IEA: Sectoral Approaches to Greenhouse Gas Mitigation—Exploring Issues for Heavy Industry. International Energy Agency, Paris (2007)

  2. European Commission: 2007/589/EC: Commission Decision of 18 July 2007 Establishing Guidelines for the Monitoring and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Pursuant to Directive. Off J Eur Union (2007)

  3. Norgate, T.E., Langberg, D.: Environmental and economic aspects of charcoal use in steelmaking. ISIJ Int. 49(4), 587–595 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wing, Ng K., Giroux, L., MacPhee, T., Todoschuk, T.: Combustibility of charcoal for direct injection in blast furnace ironmaking. Assoc. Iron Steel Technol. (2012)

  5. Mathieson, J.G., Rogers, H., Somerville, M.A., Jahanshahi, S., Ridgeway, P.: Potential for the use of biomass in the iron and steel industrie. In: Chemeca 2011, Syndey, Australia, 18–21 Sept 2011

  6. Matsumura, T., Ichida, M., Nagasaka, T., Kato, K.: Carbonization behaviour of woody biomass and resulting metallurgical coke properties. ISIJ Int. 48(5), 572–577 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Macphee, J.A., Gransden, J.F., Giroux, L., Price, J.T.: Possible CO2 mitigation via addition of charcoal to coking coal blends. Fuel Process. Technol. 90, 16–20 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lovel, R., Vining, K., Dell’Amico, M.: Iron ore sintering with charcoal. Miner. Process. Extr. Metal. 116(2), 85–92 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lovel, R., Vining, K., Dell’Amico, M.: The influence of fuel reactivity on iron ore sintering. ISIJ Int. 49(2), 195–202 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guivarch A.: Valeur Fertilisante à Court Terme du Phosphore des Boues de Stations D’épuration Urbaines. INPL (2001)

  11. Leclerc, M.C.: Canne de maïs ensilée. L’institut de l’élevage (2003)

  12. US Department of Energy: Biomass Feedstock Composition and Property Database. http://www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/databases.html (2004)

  13. Mohan, D., Pittman, C.U., Steele, P.H.: Pyrolysis of wood/biomass for bio-oil: a critical review. Energy Fuels 20, 848–889 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bergman P.C.A., Boersma A.R., Kiel J.H.A., Prins M.J., Ptasinski K.J., Janssen, F.J.J.G.: Torrefaction for biomass upgrading. In: European Biomass Conference & Exhibition, Paris, France, 17–21 Oct 2005

  15. Norgate, T., Haque, N., Somerville, M.A., Jahanshahi, S.: Biomass as a source of renewable carbon for iron and steelmaking. ISIJ Int. 52(8), 1472–1481 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. European Parliament: Les forêts de l’union européenne. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/workingpapers/agri/s4-1-1_fr.htm (1996)

  17. Agreste, Ministère de l’agriculture de l’alimentation de la pêche de la ruralité et de l’aménagement du territoire: Récolte de bois et production de sciages en 2008. Agreste Chiffres et Données Agroalimentaires 170 (2010)

  18. Palosuo, T., Wihersaari, M., Liski, J.: Net greenhousegas emissions due to energy use of forest residues—Impact of soil carbon balance. In: Woody Biomass as an Energy Source—Challenges in Europe, Joensuu, Finland, 25–28 Sept 2000

  19. ADEME: La récolte raisonnée des rémanents en forêt (2008)

  20. IFN, ADEME, Solagro: Evaluation du potentiel Bois Energie (2004)

  21. Renaud, J.P.: Innovations dans la gestion des marchés: les contrats d’approvisionnement. In: Forêt-bois: quelles ressources pour quels produits? Nancy 2011

  22. ADEME, ITCF: Résidus de culture: paille de céréales. ADEME, ITCF, Paris (1998)

  23. Sourie, J.C.: Les pailles de céréales, ressources, valorisations, obstacles à leur mobilisation. In: Chimie verte: questions à la recherche, Paris 2006

  24. Raffelt, K., Henrich, E., Koegel, A., Stahl, A., Steinhardt, J., Weirich, F.: The BTL2 process of biomass utilization entrained-flow gasification of pyrolyzed biomass slurries. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 129, 153–164 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. CAL: Agriculture en Lorraine. http://cra-lorraine.fr/index.php?page=060&rubrique=Productions%20agricoles (2010)

  26. Guillin, S.: Les grandes cultures en Lorraine—Récolte 2011. DRAAF, Metz (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Agreste: Déchets des industries agroalimentaires selon le type de déchet et la région en 2008. Agreste Primeur, vol. 245. Agreste Primeur (2010)

  28. Agreste, I.N.S.E.E.: Enquête sur la production de déchets non dangereux dans l’industrie en 2008. Agreste, Montreuil sous bois (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  29. FAO: FAOSTAT (2012)

  30. Börjesson, P.I.I.: Emissions of CO2 from biomass production and transportation in agriculture and forestry. ECM 37(6–8), 1235–1240 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pennise, D.M., Smith, K.R., Kithinji, J.P., Rezende, M.E., Raad, T.J., Zhang, J., Fan, C.: Emissions of greenhouse gases and other airborne pollutants from charcoal making in Kenya and Brazil. JGR 106(24), 143–155 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hammond, J., Shackley, S., Sohi, S., Brownsort, P.: Prospective life cycle carbon abatement for pyrolysis biochar systems in the UK. Energy Policy 39, 2646–2655 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Steelonthenet: Metallurigcal coke prices—Europe 2008–2012. http://www.steelonthenet.com/files/blast-furnace-coke.html (2012). Accessed 27 Apr 2012

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Saint-Gobain PAM and Agence Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie for their financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut Jean Lamour, Labex DAMAS, CNRS, Université de Lorraine, Parc de Saurupt, 54011, Nancy, France

    G. Fick, O. Mirgaux & F. Patisson

  2. Saint-Gobain PAM, Pont-à-Mousson, France

    G. Fick & P. Neau

Authors
  1. G. Fick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. O. Mirgaux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Neau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F. Patisson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Patisson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fick, G., Mirgaux, O., Neau, P. et al. Using Biomass for Pig Iron Production: A Technical, Environmental and Economical Assessment. Waste Biomass Valor 5, 43–55 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-013-9223-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-013-9223-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation