Abstract
Disputes about the origins of psychology in the history of the discipline are functional not for our understanding of the past, but as normative signs that regulate the construction of ideas in the future. We introduce the notion of open-ended normativity that regulates the development of a given discipline towards its future. Hence the question of the cultural origins of psychology becomes contested in the 21st century as an important topic. It proves that the history of psychology is an active participant in the making of psychology, as it is creating its future.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
“Hans-Georg Gadamer” (1900–2002)‘ by Lauren Swayne Barthold, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ISSN 2161–0002, http://www.iep.utm.edu/, accessed March 5, 2015.
For the personal humanity of the “giant” see van der Veer and Zavershneva 2011.
References
Balslev, A. N. (1991). Cultural otherness: correspondence with Richard Rorty. Atlanta: Scholars Press.
Bowen, J. R. (2007). Why the French don’t like headscarves. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Brock, A. C. (2015). Presentism and diversity in the history of psychology. Psychological Studies, 60, xxx–yyyy.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1960). Truth and method. (Second revised edition 2000). New York: Continuum.
Gigerenzer, G., Swijtink, Z., Porter, T., Daston, L., Beatty, J., & Krüger, L. (1989). The empire of chance: How probability changed science and everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Katz, J. (1996). The social psychology of Adam and Eve. Theory & Society, 25, 545–582.
McGinty, A. M. (2006). Becoming Muslim: Western women’s conversion to Islam. London: Palgrave/Macmillan.
Moghaddam, F. (1997). The specialized society: The plight of the individual an an age of individualism. Westport: Praeger.
Rorty, R. (1982). Consequences of pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Rosa, A. (1994). History of psychology as a ground for reflexivity. In A. Rosa & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Explorations in socio-cultural studies (Historical and theoretical discourse, Vol. 1, pp. 149–168). Madrid: Fundacion Infancia y Aprendizaje.
Tartaglia, J. (2014). Rorty’s thesis of the cultural specificity of philosophy. Philosophy East and West, 64, 1016–1036.
Valsiner, J. (1988). Developmental psychology in the Soviet Union. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Valsiner, J. (2012). The guided science: History of psychology in the mirror of its making. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Valsiner, J., & van der Veer, R. (2014). Encountering the border: Vygotsky’s zona blizaishego razvitya and its implications for theory of development. In A. Yasnitsky, R. van der Veer, & M. Ferrari (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Cultural-Historical Psychology (pp. 148–173). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky. Oxford: Blackwell.
van der Veer, R., & Zavershneva, E. (2011). To Moscow with love: partial reconstruction of Vygotsky’s Trip to London. IPBS: Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 45, 458–474.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1971). Psychology of Art. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Acknowledgments
The preparation of this paper was supported by the Niels Bohr Professorship grant from Den Danske Grundforskningsfond.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Valsiner, J., Brinkmann, S. Could Presentism in the Histories of Psychology Actually be Futuristic?. Psychol Stud 60, 380–383 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-015-0310-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-015-0310-1