Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Optimierte Körperformung mittels Liposuktion und nicht-invasiver Verfahren

Optimized body contouring using liposuction and non-invasive procedures

  • Übersichten
  • Published:
Journal für Ästhetische Chirurgie Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Die Fettgewebsreduktion zur Körperformung ist ein sehr häufiger Wunsch von Patienten. Die Liposuktion hat sich dabei als die effektivste Methode herausgestellt. Durch Verfeinerung der Techniken hat sie heutzutage in der Hand des geübten Operateurs ein sehr niedriges Risikoprofil. Zusatzverfahren zur Absaugung versprechen eine additive Verbesserung vor allem bei der Gewebestraffung. Dennoch wurden in den letzten Jahren viele Alternativverfahren im nicht-invasiven Bereich auf den Markt gebracht. Ohne Ausfallzeit für den Patienten soll mit diesen eine optimierte Körperkonturierung erreicht werden.

Fragestellung

Welche operativen und nicht-operativen Methoden zur primären Verschlankung gibt es, welche Risiken sind damit verbunden und wie effektiv sind sie?

Methode

Der vorliegende Artikel stellt diese Methoden vor, ordnet sie und bespricht die Vor- und Nachteile sowie ihre Effektivität anhand der Literatur und persönlicher Erfahrungen.

Schlussfolgerungen

Die Liposuktion, besonders die vibrationsassistierte in Tumeszenzlokalanästhesie, ist die effektivste Methode der Fettreduktion. Sie sollte immer durch einen erfahrenen Arzt erfolgen. Nichtoperative Techniken kommen bisher noch nicht an die Effektivität der Absaugung heran. Vielversprechend sind jedoch die synergistischen Effekte bei der Kombination verschiedener Verfahren.

Abstract

Background

The reduction of fatty tissue for body contouring is a very common desire of patients and liposuction has emerged as the most effective method. By refinements of the technique it nowadays has a very low risk profile in the hands of experienced surgeons. Additional liposuction devices promise a further improvement especially in tissue tightening, however, in recent years many alternative methods have emerged on the market in the non-invasive sector. With these methods an optimized body contouring should be achieved without downtime for the patient.

Objective

This article describes the operative and non-operative methods for primary body contouring, the risks associated with them and the effectiveness.

Methods

This article presents the surgical and non-surgical methods, puts them in order of merit and discusses the advantages and disadvantages as well as the effectiveness based on the literature and personal experience.

Conclusion

Liposuction, in particular the vibration-assisted method using tumescent local anesthesia, is the most effective method of fat reduction but should always be carried out by an experienced surgeon. Non-operative techniques cannot approach the effectiveness of liposuction; however, the synergistic effects of combinations of various procedures are extremely promising.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7
Abb. 8

Literatur

  1. Ahmad J, Eaves FF III, Rohrich RJ, Kenkel JM (2011) The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS) survey: current trends in liposuction. Aesthet Surg J 31(2):214–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Apfelberg DB, Rosenthal S, Hunstad JP et al (1994) Progress report on multicenter study of laser-assisted liposuction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 18(3):259–264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Avci P, Nyame TT, Gupta GK et al (2013) Low-level laser therapy for fat layer reduction: a comprehensive review. Lasers Surg Med 45(6):349–357

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Avram MM, Harry RS (2009) Cryolipolysis for subcutaneous fat layer reduction. Lasers Surg Med 41(10):703–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Beck-Schimmer B, Pasch T (2002) Tumeszenz-Lokalanästhesie. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 37(2):84–88

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bingol UA, Cinar C (2014) Laser lipolysis without suction: reality or myth? Photomed Laser Surg 32(11):642–645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carruthers J, Stevens WG, Carruthers A, Humphrey S (2014) Cryolipolysis and skin tightening. Dermatol Surg 40(Suppl 12):S184–S189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Caruso-Davis MK, Guillot TS, Podichetty VK et al (2011) Efficacy of low-level laser therapy for body contouring and spot fat reduction. Obes Surg 21(6):722–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Coleman SR, Sachdeva K, Egbert BM et al (2009) Clinical efficacy of noninvasive cryolipolysis and its effects on peripheral nerves. Aesthetic Plast Surg 33(4):482–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Coleman WP III, Katz B, Bruck M et al (2001) The efficacy of powered liposuction. Dermatol Surg 27(8):735–738

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Conroy PH, O’Rourke J (2013) Tumescent anaesthesia. Surgeon 11(4):210–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Craig SB, Concannon MJ, McDonald GA, Puckett CL (1999) The antibacterial effects of tumescent liposuction fluid. Plast Reconstr Surg 103(2):666–670

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Diamantis S, Bastek T, Groben P, Morrell D (2006) Subcutaneous fat necrosis in a newborn following icebag application for treatment of supraventricular tachycardia. J Perinatol 26(8):518–520

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ferraro GA, De Francesco F, Cataldo C et al (2012) Synergistic effects of cryolipolysis and shock waves for noninvasive body contouring. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36(3):666–679

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fodor PB, Vogt PA (1999) Power-assisted lipoplasty (PAL): a clinical pilot study comparing PAL to traditional lipoplasty (TL). Aesthetic Plast Surg 23(6):379–385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Garibyan L, Sipprell WH III, Jalian HR et al (2014) Three-dimensional volumetric quantification of fat loss following cryolipolysis. Lasers Surg Med 46(2):75–80

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Goldberg DJ, Fazeli A, Berlin AL (2008) Clinical, laboratory, and MRI analysis of cellulite treatment with a unipolar radiofrequency device. Dermatol Surg 34(2):204–209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grassi DG, Gavier B, Trucco J, Baña MT (2014) Acute pancreatitis after high-intensity focused ultrasonography for body sculpting. Ann Intern Med 160(1):71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Habbema L (2010) Efficacy of tumescent local anesthesia with variable lidocaine concentration in 3430 consecutive cases of liposuction. J Am Acad Dermatol 62(6):988–994

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hasengschwandtner F, Gundermann KJ (2013) Injection lipolysis with phosphatidylcholine and deoxycholate. Aesthet Surg J 33(7):1071–1072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hoffmann K (2010) Injektionslipolyse. Hautarzt 61(10):847–855

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gesellschaft für Ästhetische Chirurgie Deutschlands e.V. (Hrsg) (2011) Neue Statistik der Schönheitsoperationen. http://www.gacd.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pdf/presse2011/Presseinformation_Jahresstatistik_Schoenheitsoperationen.pdf. Zugegriffen: 28. Sept. 2011

  23. Gesellschaft für Ästhetische Chirurgie Deutschlands e.V. (Hrsg) (2010) Neue Statistik der Schönheitsoperationen. http://www.gacd.de/presse/pressemappe-2010/pressetext/#statistik. Zugegriffen: 09. Sept. 2010

  24. Illouz YG (1983) Body contouring by lipolysis: a 5-year experience with over 3000 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 72(5):591–597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jackson RF, Dedo DD, Roche GC et al (2009) Low-level laser therapy as a non-invasive approach for body contouring: a randomized, controlled study. Lasers Surg Med 41(10):799–809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jackson RF, Roche GC, Shanks SC (2013) A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial evaluating the ability of low-level laser therapy to improve the appearance of cellulite. Lasers Surg Med 45(3):141–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jalian HR, Avram MM, Garibyan L et al (2014) Paradoxical adipose hyperplasia after cryolipolysis. JAMA Dermatol 150(3):317–319

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jewell M (2010) Commentary. Aesthet Surg J 30(2):246–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jewell ML, Weiss RA, Baxter RA et al (2012) Safety and tolerability of high-intensity focused ultrasonography for noninvasive body sculpting: 24-week data from a randomized, sham-controlled study. Aesthet Surg J 32(7):868–876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Katz BE, Bruck MC, Coleman WP III (2001) The benefits of powered liposuction versus traditional liposuction: a paired comparison analysis. Dermatol Surg 27(10):863–867

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Katz BE, Maiwald DC (2005) Power liposuction. Dermatol Clin 23(3):383–391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Klein JA (1990) Tumescent technique for regional anesthesia permits lidocaine doses of 35 mg/kg for liposuction. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 16(3):248–263 (Review)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Klein KB, Zelickson B, Riopelle JG et al (2009) Non-invasive cryolipolysis for subcutaneous fat reduction does not affect serum lipid levels or liver function tests. Lasers Surg Med 41(10):785–790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Krueger N, Luebberding S, Sattler G et al (2013) The history of aesthetic medicine and surgery. J Drugs Dermatol 12(7):737–742

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Man D, Meyer H (2007) Water jet-assisted lipoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 27(3):342–346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Manstein D, Laubach H, Watanabe K et al (2008) Selective cryolysis: a novel method of non-invasive fat removal. Lasers Surg Med 40(9):595–604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Manuskiatti W, Wachirakaphan C, Lektrakul N, Varothai S (2009) Circumference reduction and cellulite treatment with a TriPollar radiofrequency device: a pilot study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 23(7):820–827

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. McRae E, Boris J (2013) Independent evaluation of low-level laser therapy at 635 nm for non-invasive body contouring of the waist, hips, and thighs. Lasers Surg Med 45(1):1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Moreno-Moraga J, Valero-Altés T, Riquelme AM et al (2007) Body contouring by non-invasive transdermal focused ultrasound. Lasers Surg Med 39(4):315–323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Neira R, Arroyave J, Ramirez H et al (2002) Fat liquefaction: effect of low-level laser energy on adipose tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg 110(3):912–922 (discussion 923–925)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Nestor MS, Zarraga MB, Park H (2012) Effect of 635 nm low-level laser therapy on upper arm circumference reduction: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 5(2):42–48

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Paul M, Mulholland RS (2009) A new approach for adipose tissue treatment and body contouring using radiofrequency-assisted liposuction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 33(5):687–694

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Pinto H, Melamed G, Fioravanti L (2012) Intralipotherapy patient satisfaction evaluation study (IPSES). Eur J Aesth Med Dermatol 2(1):29–34

    Google Scholar 

  44. Robinson DM, Kaminer MS, Baumann L et al (2014) High-intensity focused ultrasound for the reduction of subcutaneous adipose tissue using multiple treatment techniques. Dermatol Surg 40(6):641–651

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rotunda AM (2009) Injectable treatments for adipose tissue: terminology, mechanism, and tissue interaction. Lasers Surg Med 41(10):714–720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Saedi N, Kaminer M (2013) New waves for fat reduction: high-intensity focused ultrasound. Semin Cutan Med Surg 32(1):26–30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Salti G, Motolese P (2012) Cavitational adiposytolysis with a new micro-gelatinous injectable for subcutaneous adipose tissue volume reduction: ex-vivo histological findings. Eur J Aesth Med Dermatol 2(2):94–97

    Google Scholar 

  48. Sasaki GH, Tevez A (2009) Laser-assisted liposuction for facial and body contouring and tissue tightening: a 2-year experience with 75 consecutive patients. Semin Cutan Med Surg 28(4):226–235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sasaki GH (2010) Quantification of human abdominal tissue tightening and contraction after component treatments with 1064-nm/1320-nm laser-assisted lipolysis: clinical implications. Aesthet Surg J 30(2):239–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Sasaki GH (2013) Single treatment of grades II and III cellulite using a minimally invasive 1,440-nm pulsed Nd:YAG laser and side-firing fiber: an institutional review board-approved study with a 24-month follow-up period. Aesthetic Plast Surg 37(6):1073–1089

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Sattler G, Bergfeld D, Sommer B (2004) Liposuktion. Hautarzt 55(7):599–604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Sattler G, Sommer B, Bergfeld D, Sattler S (1999) Tumescent liposuction in Germany: history and new trends and techniques. Dermatol Surg 25(3):221–223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Stevens WG, Bachelor EP (2015) Cryolipolysis conformable-surface applicator for nonsurgical fat reduction in lateral thighs. Aesthet Surg J 35(1):66–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Swanson E (2012) Assessment of reduction in subcutaneous fat thickness after liposuction using magnetic resonance imaging. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65(1):128–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Zelickson BD, Burns AJ, Kilmer SL (2015) Cryolipolysis for safe and effective inner thigh fat reduction. Lasers Surg Med. doi:10.1002/lsm.22320 (online first)

  56. Zocchi M (1992) Ultrasonic liposculpturing. Aesthetic Plast Surg 16(4):287–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rosenpark Klinik, Heidelberger Landstr. 18–20, 64297, Darmstadt, Deutschland

    K. Feise & G. Sattler

Authors
  1. K. Feise
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Sattler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Feise.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

K. Feise und G. Sattler geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Alle Patienten, die durch Bildmaterial oder anderweitige Angaben innerhalb des Manuskripts zu identifizieren sind, haben hierzu ihre schriftliche Einwilligung gegeben. Im Falle von nicht mündigen Patienten liegt die Einwilligung eines Erziehungsberechtigten oder des gesetzlich bestellten Betreuers vor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feise, K., Sattler, G. Optimierte Körperformung mittels Liposuktion und nicht-invasiver Verfahren. J. f. Ästhet. Chirurgie 8, 87–96 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12631-015-0004-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12631-015-0004-5

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation