To the Editor,
Historically, the precordial stethoscope was the universal standard for continuous cardiorespiratory monitoring during pediatric anesthesia.1,2 Today, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is preferred whenever advanced hemodynamic monitoring is required for neonates, infants, or children.3 Nevertheless, up to 3% of patients may experience a complication with insertion of the TEE probe,4 and advanced training and specialty certification are generally recommended for comprehensive application of TEE monitoring. Moreover, certain anatomic and clinical conditions may preclude its utilization. By contrast, surface ultrasound (transthoracic echocardiography, or TTE) has gained attention in recent years within anesthesiology because of its lower cost, wide availability, ease of use, and safety as a non-invasive technique.5 Nevertheless, traditional TTE monitoring in the operating room is limited by the acquisition of adequate ultrasound images while access to the patient’s chest is often restricted, and the use of a relatively bulky, handheld transthoracic probe—potentially interrupting surgery.
Therefore, we utilized the concept of the low-profile precordial stethoscope for continuous non-invasive cardiovascular monitoring by replacing the stethoscope with a low-profile TEE ultrasound probe applied to the surface of the chest. Here, we report our initial pilot tests during pediatric anesthesia.
We provided care to three patients (45 weeks post-conceptual age, nine months, and four years) who required advanced intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring where we elected to interrogate cardiac function with a TEE probe secured to the chest wall during surgery. Written consent for publication was obtained from the patients’ parents.
The echocardiographic exams were performed with the S7-3t pediatric TEE probe and a Philips CX 50 ultrasound machine (Philips Ultrasound, Bothell, WA, USA). The probe was placed over the left parasternal third or fourth intercostal space and the parasternal long axis and short axis views were obtained by adjusting the transducer angle (Figure, panels A, B, and C). The probe was secured with a transparent dressing (TegadermTM I.V. Advanced 1683, 3M, St. Paul, MN, USA; Figure, panel A). The TEE probe was also successfully used during a procedure in the prone position (Figure, panel E). The shaft was padded along the contact with the skin, and the contact between the probe and the chest was checked manually for pressure every 15 min. This technique safely secured the probe while maintaining easy access for simple TEE adjustments to provide virtually continuous cardiac monitoring. Thus, certain procedures in which esophageal insertion of a TEE probe is not feasible can be managed with this approach.
We found that a TEE probe secured in a transthoracic position in children provides echocardiographic assessment of intraoperative circulatory volume, fluid responsiveness, left and right ventricular function, and basic valvular integrity. In addition, left ventricular ejection fraction can be calculated and colour-flow Doppler utilized to assess the direction and turbulence of blood flow. Lastly, the need for and the efficacy of inotropic therapy can be guided by this method.
The transthoracic use of the TEE probe requires specific considerations. Careful padding of the probe and regular inspection of any pressure points are essential. Continuous monitoring of the ultrasound may need to be interrupted to prevent thermal injury of the skin under an active TEE transducer (which may generate significant heat up to 42°C).4 None of our patients exhibited any detectable skin issues even after a five hour long procedure (Figure, panel F).
We acknowledge that TEE probes are expensive, and this application is outside its traditional application. Nevertheless, if a TEE probe is readily available, transthoracic utilization of the TEE probe may be considered for intraoperative cardiac monitoring by pediatric anesthesiologists. Indeed, one may consider this modality the precordial stethoscope of the 21st century.
References
van Wijk JJ, Weber F, Stolker RJ, Staals LM. Current state of noninvasive, continuous monitoring modalities in pediatric anesthesiology. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2020; 33: 781-7.
Goudsouzian NG, Ryan JF. Recent advances in pediatric anesthesia. Pediatr Clin North Am 1976; 23: 345-60.
Jaidka A, Hobbs H, Koenig S, Millington SJ, Arntfield RT. Better with ultrasound: transesophageal echocardiography. Chest 2019; 155: 194-201.
Stevenson JG. Incidence of complications in pediatric transesophageal echocardiography: experience in 1650 cases. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1999; 12: 527-32.
Royse CF, Canty DJ, Faris J, Haji DL, Veltman M, Royse A. Core review: physician-performed ultrasound: the time has come for routine use in acute care medicine. Anesth Analg 2012; 115: 1007-28.
Disclosures
Richard C. Prielipp is a former member of the Board of Directors of the Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation (APSF), a foundation of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. He also serves on the speakers’ bureau for Merck Co, Inc (Kenilworth, NJ) and an opinion leader for 3M (Minneapolis, MN).
Funding statement
None.
Editorial responsibility
This submission was handled by Dr. Philip M. Jones, Deputy Editor-in-Chief, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Horvath, B., Diab, R., Prielipp, R.C. et al. Transthoracic utilization of the transesophageal echocardiography probe—a novel window to non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring for the pediatric anesthesiologist. Can J Anesth/J Can Anesth 68, 1090–1092 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-021-01976-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-021-01976-6