Skip to main content
Log in

Cut-off points for muscle mass — not grip strength or gait speed — determine variations in sarcopenia prevalence

  • Published:
The journal of nutrition, health & aging

Abstract

Objectives

The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) has proposed different methods and cut-off points for the three parameters that define sarcopenia: muscle mass, muscle strength and physical performance. Although this facilitates clinical practice, it limits comparability between studies and leads to wide differences in published prevalence rates. The aim of this study was to assess how changes in cut-off points for muscle mass, gait speed and grip strength affected sarcopenia prevalence according to EWGSOP criteria.

Methods

Cross-sectional analysis of elderly individuals recruited from outpatient clinics (n=298) and nursing homes (n=276). We measured muscle mass, grip strength and gait speed and assessed how changes in cut-off points changed sarcopenia prevalence in both populations.

Results

An increase from 5.45 kg/m2 to 6.68 kg/m2 in the muscle mass index for female outpatients and nursing-home residents increased sarcopenia prevalence from 4% to 23% and from 9% to 47%, respectively; for men, for an increase from 7.25 kg/m2 to 8.87 kg/m2, the corresponding increases were from 1% to 22% and from 6% to 41%, respectively. Changes in gait speed and grip strength had a limited impact on sarcopenia prevalence.

Conclusion

The cut-off points used for muscle mass affect the reported prevalence rates for sarcopenia and, in turn, affect comparability between studies. The main factors influencing the magnitude of the change are muscle mass index distribution in the population and the absolute value of the cut-off points: the same difference between two references (e.g., 7.5 kg/m2 to 7.75 kg/m2 or 7.75 kg/m2 to 8 kg/m2) may produce different changes in prevalence. Changes in cut-off points for gait speed and grip strength had a limited impact on sarcopenia prevalence and on study comparability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, et al. Sarcopenia: European con-sensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. 2010;Age Ageing doi:10.1093/ageing/afq034

  2. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Landi F, Schneider SM, et al. Prevalence of and interven-tions for sarcopenia in ageing adults: a systematic review. Report of the Interna-tional Sarcopenia Initiative (EWGSOP and IWGS). 2014; Age Ageing doi:10.1093/ageing/ afu115

  3. Bijlsma AY, Meskers CGM, Ling CHY, et al. Defining sarcopenia: the im-pact of different diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of sarcopenia in a large mid-dle aged cohort. 2013; AGE doi:10.1007/s11357-012-9384-z

  4. Reijnierse EM, Trappenburg MC, Leter MJ, et al. The Impact of Different Diagnostic Criteria on the Prevalence of Sarcopenia in Healthy Elderly Partici-pants and Geriatric Outpatients. 2015;Gerontology doi:10.1159/000377699

  5. Beaudart C, Reginster J-Y, Slomian J, Buckinx F, Locquet M, Bruyère O. Prevalence of sarcopenia: the impact of different diagnostic cut-off limits. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 14(4):425-431.

  6. Osuna-Pozo CM, Serra-Rexach JA, Viña J, et al. Prevalencia de sarcopenia en consultas de geriatría y residencias. Estudio ELLI.Rev. Esp. 2014;Geriatría Gerontol. doi:10.1016/j.regg.2013.01.006

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cuesta F, Formiga F, Lopez-soto A, et al. Prevalence of Sarcopenia in Pa-tients Attending Outpatient Geriatric Clinics. The ELLI Study. 2015;Age Ageing doi:10.1093/ageing/afv088

    Google Scholar 

  8. Salvà A, Serra-Rexach JA, Artaza I, et al. La prevalencia de sarcopenia en residencias de España: comparación de los resultados del estudio multicéntrico ELLI con otras poblaciones.Rev. Esp. 2016;Geriatría Gerontol. doi:10.1016/j.regg.2016.02.004

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, et al. A short physical perfor-mance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol. 1994;49(2):M85–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Baumgartner RN, Ross R. Estimation of skeletal muscle mass by bioelectrical impedance analysis. J Appl Physiol. 2000;89(2):465–471.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Masanes Toran F, Culla A, Navarro-González M, et al. Prevalence of sarco-penia in healthy community-dwelling elderly in an urban area of Barcelona (Spain). J. Nutr. Health Aging 2012;doi:10.1007/s12603-011-0108-3

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kelly TL, Wilson KE, Heymsfield SB. Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Body Composition Reference Values from NHANES. Vella A, ed. PLoS ONE, 2009; doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007038

    Google Scholar 

  13. Baumgartner RN, Koehler KM, Gallagher D, et al. Epidemiology of Sarco-penia among the Elderly in New Mexico. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;147(8):755–763.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Delmonico MJ, Harris TB, Visser M, et al. Longitudinal study of muscle strength, quality, and adipose tissue infiltration.Am.. Clin. Nutr. 2009; doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.28047

    Google Scholar 

  15. Janssen I. Skeletal Muscle Cutpoints Associated with Elevated Physical Disability Risk in Older Men and Women.Am. 2004;J. Epidemiol. doi:10.1093/aje/kwh058

  16. Tichet J, Vol S, Goxe D, Salle A, Berrut G, Ritz P. Prevalence of sarcopenia in the French senior population. J Nutr Health Aging. 2008;12(3):202–206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chien M-Y, Huang T-Y, Wu Y-T. Prevalence of Sarcopenia Estimated Us-ing a Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Prediction Equation in Community-Dwelling Elderly People in Taiwan.J.Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2008; doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01854.x

    Google Scholar 

  18. Landi F, Liperoti R, Fusco D, et al. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Sarco-penia Among Nursing Home Older Residents.J. Gerontol. A. Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2012; doi:10.1093/gerona/glr035

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in Older Adults: Evidence for a Phenotype. J Gerontol Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146–157.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. McLean RR, Shardell MD, Alley DE, et al. Criteria for Clinically Relevant Weakness and Low Lean Mass and Their Longitudinal Association With Incident Mobility Impairment and Mortality: The Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) Sarcopenia Project.J. Gerontol. A. Biol. Sci. Med, 2014;. Sci. doi:10.1093/ gerona/glu012

    Google Scholar 

  21. Alley DE, Shardell MD, Peters KW, et al. Grip Strength Cutpoints for the Identification of Clinically Relevant Weakness.J. Gerontol.A. Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2014; doi:10.1093/gerona/glu011

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chen L, Nelson DR, Zhao Y, Cui Z, Johnston JA. Relationship between muscle mass and muscle strength, and the impact of comorbidities: a population-based, cross-sectional study of older adults in the United States. BMC Geriatr. 2013; doi:10.1186/1471-2318-13-74

    Google Scholar 

  23. de Souza Vasconcelos KS, Domingues Dias JM, de Carvalho Bastone A, et al. Handgrip strength cutoff points to identify mobility limitation in com-munitydwelling older people and associated factors. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2016; doi:10.1007/ s12603-015-0584-y

    Google Scholar 

  24. Htun NC, Ishikawa-Takata K, Kuroda A, et al. Screening for malnutrition in community dwelling older Japanese: Preliminary development and evaluation of the Japanese Nutritional Risk Screening Tool (NRST).J. Nutr. Health Aging 2016; doi:10.1007/s12603-015-0555-3

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xavier Rojano i Luque.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Masanés, F., Rojano i Luque, X., Salvà, A. et al. Cut-off points for muscle mass — not grip strength or gait speed — determine variations in sarcopenia prevalence. J Nutr Health Aging 21, 825–829 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-016-0844-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-016-0844-5

Keywords

Navigation