Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Platform Provider by Accident

A Case Study of Digital Platform Coring

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Business & Information Systems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed the rapid emergence of digital technology as not just an enabler, but indeed a material basis for platform development. However, extant platform literature does not adequately address strategies related to digital platforms. Specifically, the notion of platform coring does not consider how a core is to be identified or the nature of a core in relation to entangled physical and digital materiality. This paper presents a single-case study of a digital platform for business-to-business services. Results suggest that rather than a specific platform element, the core of a digital platform may be described as a capability to harness the potential of digital technology. Furthermore, platform coring may be aided by adopting value propositions as a means to conceptualize the process of negotiating mutual benefit among platform stakeholders. This study contributes to the understanding of digital platform establishment as it addresses the notion of coring and the emergent process related to the distributed ontology of digital technology and a situated perception of value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey DE, Leonardi PM, Barley SR (2012) The lure of the virtual. Organ Sci 23(5):1485–1504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett M, Davidson E, Prabhu J, Vargo SL (2015) Service innovation in the digital age: key contributions and future research. MIS Q 39(1):135–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchette JF (2011) A material history of bits. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 62(6):1042–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccagnoli M, Forman C, Huang P, Wu DJ (2012) Cocreation of value in a platform ecosystem: the case of enterprise software. MIS Q 36(1):263–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H (2011) Open services innovation: rethinking your business to grow and compete in a new era. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW (2007) Qualitative inquiry and research design - choosing among five approaches, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • den Hertog P (2000) Knowledge-intensive business services as co-producers of innovation. Int J Innov Manag 4(4):491–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):532–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad Manag J 50(1):25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenmann T, Parker G, Van Alstyne MW (2009) Opening platforms: how, when, and why? In: Gawer A (ed) Platforms, markets and innovation. Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 131–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans DS (2009) How catalysts ignite: the economics of platform-based start-ups. In: Gawer A (ed) Platforms, markets and innovation. Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 99–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawer A (2009) Platform dynamics and strategies: from products to services. In: Gawer A (ed) Platforms, markets and innovation. Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 45–76

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gawer A (2014) Bridging different perspectives on technological platforms: toward an integrative framework. Res Policy 43(7):1239–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawer A, Cusumano MA (2014) Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. J Prod Innov Manag 31(3):417–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghazawneh A, Henfridsson O (2013) Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: the boundary resources model. Inf Syst J 23(1):173–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein S (2009) Open platform development and the commercial Internet. In: Gawer A (ed) Platforms, markets and innovation. Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 45–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagiu A (2014) Strategic decisions for multisided platforms. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 55(2):71–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Iansiti M, Levien R (2004) The keystone advantage: what the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation and sustainability. Harv Bus School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallinikos J, Aaltonen A, Marton A (2013) The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts. MIS Q 37(2):357–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale S, Brinkmann S (2009) Interviews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee AS, Baskerville RL (2003) Generalizing generalizability in information systems research. Inf Syst Res 14(3):221–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi PM (2010) Digital materiality? How artifacts without matter, matter. First Monday 15(6)

  • Li YR (2009) The technological roadmap of Cisco’s business ecosystem. Technovation 29(5):379–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin L, Daim TU (2009) Platform strategy framework for internet-based service development: case of eBay. Int J Ser Technol Manag 11(4):334–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusch RF, Nambisan S (2015) Service innovation: a service-dominant logic perspective. MIS Q 39(1):155–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusch RF, Vargo SL (2014) Service-dominant logic: premises, perspectives, possibilities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldaña J (2014) Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro E, Rolland KH (2012) Trans-situated use of integrated information systems. Eur J Inf Syst 21(6):608–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nambisan S (2013) Information technology and product/service innovation: a brief assessment and some suggestions for future research. J Assoc Inf Syst 14(4):215–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagani M (2013) Digital business strategy and value creation: framing the dynamic cycle of control points. MIS Q 37(2):617–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarker S, Sarker S, Sahaym A, Bjørn-Andersen N (2012) Exploring value cocreation in relationships between an ERP vendor and its partners: a revelatory case study. MIS Q 36(1):317–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez F, Cusumano M (2009) The role of services in platform markets. In: Gawer A (ed) Platforms, markets and innovation. Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 77–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas LD, Autio E, Gann DM (2014) Architectural leverage: putting platforms in context. Acad Manag Perspect 28(2):198–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush AA (2010) Research commentary – platform evolution: coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inf Syst Res 21(4):675–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsham G (2006) Doing interpretative research. Eur J Inf Syst 15(3):320–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wareham J, Fox PB, Cano Giner JL (2014) Technology ecosystem governance. Organ Sci 25(4):1195–1215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheelwright SC, Clark KB (1992) Creating project plans to focus product development. Harv Bus Rev 70(2):67–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodard CJ, Ramasubbu N, Tschang FT, Sambamurthy V (2013) Design capital and design moves: the logic of digital business strategy. MIS Q 37(2):537–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (2011) Qualitative research from start to finish. Guilford, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) Research commentary – the new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research. Inf Syst Res 21(4):724–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo Y, Boland RJ, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A (2012) Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organ Sci 23(5):1398–1408

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Informatics, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden

    Ted Saarikko

Authors
  1. Ted Saarikko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ted Saarikko.

Additional information

Accepted after two revisions by the editors of the special issue.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 97 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saarikko, T. Platform Provider by Accident. Bus Inf Syst Eng 58, 177–191 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-016-0426-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-016-0426-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation