Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Design Principles for High-Performance Blended Learning Services Delivery

The Case of Software Trainings in Germany

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Business & Information Systems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The “perfect” orchestration of training participants, IT and process design is one of the ongoing challenges within blended learning service research and practice. Blended learning services (BLS) offer a great variety of options to design learning processes, overcoming many shortcomings of pure e-learning services and providing better scalability and more advantages for learners than pure face-to-face class teaching. Nevertheless, due to inconclusive results of blended learning design research in the literature, BLS designers can hardly find support for the systematic design of efficient and successful blended learning processes, which would enable a high degree of learning success with a balanced degree of delivery effort. Based on major determinants of BLS processes’ quality, the authors identify, develop, and evaluate design principles for high performance BLS using an action design research approach. They first derive a set of initial design principles, based on insights from literature and own exploratory case studies as well as workshops with experts from the field. They then improve the design principles iteratively in expert workshops as well as apply the design principles in four software training sessions. Finally, they present seven evaluated design principles for BLS, which are the core of a nascent design theory and contribute to a time-efficient and successful BLS delivery. Furthermore, these principles enable practitioners to systematically apply the design knowledge formalized within the principles in order to improve BLS design and delivery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arbaugh JB (2001) How instructor immediacy behaviors affect student satisfaction and learning in web-based courses. Bus Comm Q 64(4):42–54. doi:10.1177/108056990106400405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur WJ, Bennett WJ, Edens PS, Bell ST (2003) Effectiveness of training in organizations: a meta-analysis of design and evaluation features. J Appl Psychol 88(2):234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitzer S, Klein M, Schumann M (2011) Approaches to improve teachers’ use of groupware. Knowl Manag E Learn 3(2):271–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitzer P, Soellner M, Leimeister JM (2013) Evaluating the quality of technology-mediated learning services. In: International conference on information systems, Milano

  • Colquitt JA, LePine JA, Noe RA (2000) Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: a meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. J Appl Psychol 85(5):678–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuthbert PF (1996) Managing service quality in HE: is SERVQUAL the answer? Part 1. Manag Serv Qual Int J 6(2):11–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delone WH (2003) The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manag Inf Syst 19(4):9–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans C, Gibbons NJ (2007) The interactivity effect in multimedia learning. Comput Educ 49(4):1147–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimmons JA, Fitzsimmons MJ (2011) Service management – operations, strategy, information technology, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fließ S, Kleinaltenkamp M (2004) Blueprinting the service company: managing service processes efficiently. J Bus Res 57(4):392–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost FA, Kumar M (2000) INTSERVQUAL – An internal adaptation of the GAP model in a large service organisation. J Serv Mark 14(5):358–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison DR, Kanuka H (2004) Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet High Educ 7(2):95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner (2012a) ERP Training Best Practices. Worldwide

  • Gartner (2012b) Forecast: Enterprise software markets, worldwide, 2011–2016, 2q12 update

  • Graham CR (2006) Blended learning systems – Definition, current trends, and future directions. In: Bonk CJ, Graham CR (eds) The handbook of blended learning: global perspectives, local designs, Chapter 1.1. Pfeiffer, San Francisco

  • Gregor S (2006) The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Q 30(3):611–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregor S, Hevner AR (2013) Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. Manag Inf Syst Q 37(2):337–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregor S, Jones D (2007) The anatomy of a design theory. J Assoc Inf Syst 8(5):312–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Greller W, Drachsler H (2012) Translating learning into numbers: a generic framework for learning analytics. Educ Technol Soc 15(3):42–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos C, Ojasalo K (2004) Service productivity: towards a conceptualization of the transformation of inputs into economic results in services. J Bus Res 57(4):414–423. doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(02)00275-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos C, Voima P (2013) Critical service logic: making sense of value creation and co-creation. J Acad Market Sci 41(2):133–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S, Bostrom RP (2009) Technology-mediated learning: a comprehensive theoretical model. J Assoc Inf Syst 10(9):686–714

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S, Bostrom RP, Huber M (2010) End-user training methods: what we know, need to know. ACM SIGMIS Database 41(4):9–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Q 28(1):75–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton T, Hughes T, Chalcraft D (2012) Service co-creation and value realisation. J Market Manag 28(13–14):1504–1519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Kwon Y, Cho D (2011) Investigating factors that influence social presence and learning outcomes in distance higher education. Comput Educ 57(2):1512–1520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick D, Kirkpatrick J (2005) Transferring learning to behavior: using the four levels to improve performance. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinaltenkamp M (2013) Nutzungsprozesse – Die vernachlässigte Seite der Wertschöpfung. In: Schmitz G (ed) Theorie und Praxis des Dienstleistungsmarketing. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ladhari R (2009) A review of twenty years of SERVQUAL research. Int J Qual Serv Sci 1(2):172–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehtinen E, Hakkarainen K, Lipponen L, Rahikainen M, Muukkonen H (1999) Computer supported collaborative learning: a review. The JHGI Giesbers reports on education 10

  • Leimeister JM (2012) Dienstleistungsengineering und -management. Springer Gabler, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leimeister JM (2015) Einführung in die Wirtschaftsinformatik. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis RC, Booms BH (1983) The marketing aspects of service quality. Emerg Perspect Servic Market 65(4):99–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin HF (2007) Measuring online learning systems success: applying the updated DeLone and McLean model. CyberPsychol Behav 10(6):817–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren R, Henfridsson O, Schultze U (2004) Design principles for competence management systems: a synthesis of an action research study. MIS Q 28(3):435–472

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin CP, Coffey S (1990) Measuring productivity in services. Int J Serv Ind Manag 1(1):46–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melville N, Kraemer K, Gurbaxani V (2004) Review: information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Q 28(2):283–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Menschner P, Peters C, Leimeister JM (2011) Engineering knowledge-intense, person-oriented services – A state of the art analysis. In: 19th European conference on information systems, Helsinki

  • Ozkan S, Koseler R (2009) Multi-dimensional students’ evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: an empirical investigation. Comput Educ 53(4):1285–1296. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL (1988) Servqual. J Retail 64(1):12–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ (2005) Qualitative research. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Petter S, DeLone W, McLean ER (2012) The past, present, and future of “IS success”. J Assoc Inf Syst 13(5):341–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich PR, De Groot EV (1990) Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. J Educ Psychol 82(1):33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasch T, Schnotz W (2009) Interactive and non-interactive pictures in multimedia learning environments: effects on learning outcomes and learning efficiency. Learn Instr 19(5):411–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray G, Muhanna WA, Barney JB (2005) Information technology and the performance of the customer service process: a resource-based analysis. MIS Q 29(4):625–652. doi:10.2307/25148703

    Google Scholar 

  • Romme AGL, Endenburg G (2006) Construction principles and design rules in the case of circular design. Organ Sci 17(2):287–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sein M, Henfridsson O, Purao S, Rossi M, Lindgren R (2011) Action design research. MIS Q 35(1):37–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyda S, Werner D (2012) IW-Weiterbildungserhebung 2011. Vierteljahresschrift zur empirischen Wirtschaftsforschung, Köln

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims R (2003) Promises of interactivity: aligning learner perceptions and expectations with strategies for flexible and online learning. Distance Educ 24(1):87–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SM, Woody PC (2000) Interactive effect of multimedia instruction and learning styles. Teach Psychol 27(3):220–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurmond V, Wambach K (2004) Understanding interactions in distance education: a review of the literature. Int J Instr Technol Distance Learn 1(1)

  • van Aken JE (2004) Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: the quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. J Manag Stud 41(2):219–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vollmar M (2013) Berufliche Weiterbildung in Unternehmen 2010. Wirtschaft und Statistik, H 4:276–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegener R, Menschner P, Leimeister JM (2012) Design and evaluation of a didactical service blueprinting method for large scale lectures. In: International conference on information systems, Orlando

  • Weiss JW, Thorogood A, Clark KD (2007) Three IT-business alignment profiles: technical resource, business enabler, and strategic weapon. Comm Assoc Inf Syst 18(1):33

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J-H, Tennyson RD, Hsia T-L (2010) A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Comput Educ 55(1):155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml VA, Parasuraman A, Berry LL (1985) Problems and strategies in services marketing. J Mark 49(2):33–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml VA, Berry LL, Parasuraman A (1988) Communication and control processes in the delivery of service quality. J Mark 52(2):35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chair for Information Systems, Kassel University, Pfannkuchstr.1, 34121, Kassel, Germany

    Philipp Bitzer,  Matthias Söllner &  Jan Marco Leimeister

  2. Institute of Information Management (IWI-HSG), University of St. Gallen, Unterer Graben 21, 9000, St. Gallen, Switzerland

    Matthias Söllner &  Jan Marco Leimeister

Authors
  1. Philipp Bitzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthias Söllner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jan Marco Leimeister
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philipp Bitzer.

Additional information

Accepted after two revisions by Prof. Dr. Becker.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 288 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bitzer, P., Söllner, M. & Leimeister, J.M. Design Principles for High-Performance Blended Learning Services Delivery. Bus Inf Syst Eng 58, 135–149 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0403-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0403-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation