Skip to main content
Log in

Trapeziometacarpal Arthrosis: Predictors of a Second Visit and Surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Hand and Microsurgery

Abstract

Trapeziometacarpal arthrosis is expected with advancing age and a limited percentage of people seek medical attention for it. We studied patients after their first appointment to address trapeziometacarpal arthrosis with a hand surgeon to determine factors associated with return for a second visit and eventual election of operative treatment. A billing database identified 306 patients in the practice of three hand surgeons with a new diagnosis of TMC arthrosis and no associated diagnoses. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses sought factors associated with a second visit and operative treatment among demographic and visit related factors. One hundred and forty-three patients (47 %) returned for one or more additional visits and 46 (15 %) eventually elected operative treatment within the study period. Independent predictors of a return visit included injection at first visit, splint at first visit, and doctor’s recommendation for a return visit. The predictors of surgery were treating surgeon and prescription of a splint at the first visit, but splint at first visit was only predictive for one of the three surgeons. When patients first learn about their trapeziometacarpal arthrosis, the behavior of the hand surgeon may have a strong influence on return visits and eventual choice of operative treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sodha S, Ring D, Zurakowski D, Jupiter JB (2005) Prevalence of osteoarthrosis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. J Bone Joint Surg 87A:2614–2618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Armstrong AL, Hunter JB, Davis TR (1994) The prevalence of degenerative arthritis of the base of the thumb in post-menopausal women. J Hand Surg 19B:340–341

    Google Scholar 

  3. Allegrante JP, Marks R (2003) Self-efficacy in management of osteoarthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2:747–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Roulot E (2008) Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. Rev Prat 58:707–715

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Day CS, Gelberman R, Patel AA, Vogt MT, Ditsios K, Boyer MI (2004) Basal joint osteoarthritis of the thumb: a prospective trial of steroid injection and splinting. J Hand Surg 29A:247–251

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cook GS, Lalonde DH (2008) MOC-PS CME Article: Management of thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:1–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Spaans AJ, van Laarhoven CM, Schuurman AH, van Minnen LP (2011) Interobserver agreement of the eaton-littler classification system and treatment strategy of thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg 36A:1467–1470

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tytherleigh-Strong G, Hampton R, McCullough CJ (1999) Carpo-metacarpal arthritis of the thumb. Current Orthopaedics 13:302–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barry MJ (2002) Health decision aids to facilitate shared decision making in office practice. Ann Intern Med 136:127–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; 10:CD001431.

Download references

Disclosure

No funds were received in direct support of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Ring.

Additional information

Level of Evidence: Prognostic, Level 4.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ochtman, A.E.A., Guitton, T.G., Buijze, G.A. et al. Trapeziometacarpal Arthrosis: Predictors of a Second Visit and Surgery. J Hand Microsurg 5, 9–13 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12593-012-0087-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12593-012-0087-6

Keywords

Navigation