Effects of light environment on maize in hillside agroforestry systems of Nepal
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Maize (Zea mays L.) is the most important staple food in the mid-hills region of Nepal. The mid-hills are characterized by steeply sloping land and complex farming systems where crops, livestock and trees are inseparable components, and maize has to compete with trees grown for fodder, fuel wood, building materials and other purposes in a landscape severely constrained for agricultural purposes. This paper reports the effects of the presence of trees growing on crop terrace risers on bari (upper-slope, rainfed) land on growth and yield of maize grown on terrace benches. Maize performance was compared with and without tree and artificial shade to determine its responses above and below ground to such limiting factors. Mean photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) incident on maize in farm conditions was lower than 700 μmol m-2 s-1, well below the light saturation point for maize (1,500 μmol m−2 s−1). Grain yield was reduced by 33% under tree shade and by 43% under artificial shade compared with natural (unshaded) conditions. As the light environment is sub-optimal for maize, the crop rarely achieved maximum rates of photosynthesis. Farmers claim that local landraces are better adapted to shade than station-bred genotypes, but there was no evidence of varietal effects upon rates of photosynthesis. However, there was some evidence that there were varietal adaptations to shade for other factors such as greater numbers of leaves and more competitive rooting patterns. Maize varieties with deeper root systems and adapted to low light conditions are required if productivity in these complex systems is to be improved. The findings of this study should be useful to breeders in developing maize genotypes suitable for the complex hillside systems of Nepal, thereby improving food security.
- Andrade, H. F., Uhart, S. A., & Frugone, M. I. (1993). Intercepted radiation at flowering and kernel number in maize: shade versus plant density effects. Crop Science, 33, 482–485. CrossRef
- Carter, E. J. (1992). Tree cultivation on private land in the middle hills of Nepal: lessons from some villages of Dolakha district. Mountain Research and Development, 12(3), 241–255. CrossRef
- Chamshama, S. A. O., Mugasha, A. G., Kloustad, A., Haveraaen, O., & Maliond, S. M. S. (1998). Growth and yield of maize alley cropped with Leucaena leucocephala and Faidherbia albida in Morogoro, Tanzania. Agroforestry Systems, 40, 215–225. CrossRef
- Duncan, W. G. (1980). Maize. In L. T. Evans (Ed.), Crop physiology (pp. 23–50). UK: University Press Cambridge.
- Duncan, W. G., & Hesketh, J. D. (1968). Net photosynthetic rates, relative leaf growth rates and leaf numbers of 22 races of maize grown at eight temperatures. Crop Science, 8, 670–674. CrossRef
- Earley, E. B., Miller, R. J., Reichert, G. L., Hageman, R. H., & Seif, R. D. (1966). Effects of shade on maize production under field conditions. Crop Science, 6, 1–7. CrossRef
- Ephrath, J. E., Wang, R. F., Terashima, K., Hesketh, J. D., Huck, M. G., & Hummel. (1993). Shading effect on soybean and corn. Biotronics, 22, 15–24.
- Gaskel, M. L., & Pearce, R. B. (1981). Growth analysis of maize hybrids differing in photosynthetic capability. Agronomy Journal, 73, 817–821. CrossRef
- Harris, D., Joshi, A., Khan, P. A., Gothkar, P., & Sodhi, P. S. (1999). On-farm seed priming in semi-arid agriculture: development and evaluation in maize, rice and chickpea in India using participatory methods. Experimental Agriculture, 35, 15–29. CrossRef
- Huxley, P. A., Pinney, A., Akunda, E., & Muraya, P. (1994). A tree-crop interface orientation experiment with a Grevillea robusta hedgerow and maize. Agroforestry Systems, 26, 23–45. CrossRef
- Johnson, I. R., Riha, S. J., & Wilks, D. S. (1995). Modelling daily net canopy photosynthesis and its adaptation to irradiance and atmospheric CO2 concentration. Agricultural Systems, 50, 1–35. CrossRef
- Jose, S., Gillespie, A. R., Seifert, J. R., & Pope, P. E. (2001). Comparison of minirhizotron and soil core methods for quantifying root biomass in a temperate alley cropping system. Agroforestry Systems, 52, 161–168. CrossRef
- Maddoni, G. A., & Otegui, M. E. (1996). Leaf area, light interception and crop development in maize. Field Crops Research, 48, 81–87. CrossRef
- Midmore, D. J., Roca, J., & Berrios, D. (1988). Potato (Solanum spp) in the hot tropics IV. Intercropping with maize and the influence of shade on potato microenvironment and crop growth. Field Crops Research, 18, 141–157. CrossRef
- Morgan, D. C., & Smith, H. (1981). Non-photosynthetic responses to light quality. In O. L. Lange, P. S. Nobel, C. B. Osmond, & H. Ziegler (Eds.), Encyclopedia of plant physiology: physiological plant ecology. I. Responses to the physical environment (pp. 108–134). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
- Peek, M. S., Russek-Cohen, E., Wait, D. A., & Forseth, I. N. (2002). Physiological response curve analysis using nonlinear mixed models. Oecologia, 132, 175–180. CrossRef
- Prasad, R. B., & Brook, R. M. (2005). Effect of varying maize densities on intercropped maize and soybean in Nepal. Experimental Agriculture, 41, 365–382. CrossRef
- Reed, A. J., Singletary, G. W., Schussler, J. R., Williamson, D. R., & Christy, A. L. (1988). Shading effects on dry matter and nitrogen partitioning, kernel number and yield of maize. Crop Science, 28, 819–825. CrossRef
- Robertson, M. J. (1994). Relationships between internode elongation, plant height and leaf appearance in maize. Field Crops Research, 38, 135–145. CrossRef
- Smith, H. (1986). The perception of light quality. In R. E. Kendrick & G. H. M. Kronenberg (Eds.), Photomorphogenesis in plants (pp. 187–216). Dortrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
- Stirling, C. M., Rodrigo, V. H., & Emberru, J. (1993). Chilling and photosynthetic productivity of field grown maize (Zea mays); changes in the parameters of the light-response curve, canopy leaf CO2 assimilation rate and crop radiation-use efficiency. Photosynthesis Research, 38, 125–133. CrossRef
- Tennant, D. (1975). A test of a modified line intersect method of estimating root length. Journal of Ecology, 63, 995–1001. CrossRef
- Thapa, B. (1994). Farmers’ ecological knowledge about the management and use of farmland tree fodder resources in the middle hills of eastern Nepal. Ph.D. Thesis. Bangor: University of Wales.
- Tiwari, T. P., Brook, R. M., & Sinclair, F. L. (2004). Implications of hill farmers’ agronomic practices in Nepal for crop improvement in maize. Experimental Agriculture, 40, 397–417. CrossRef
- Tiwari, T. P., Virk, D. S., & Sinclair, F. L. (2009). Rapid gains in yield and adoption of new maize varieties for complex hillside environments through farmer participation. I. Improving options through participatory varietal selection (PVS). Field Crops Research, 111, 137–143. CrossRef
- Tiwari, T. P., Ortiz-Ferrara, G., Urrea, C., Katuwal, R. B., Koirala, K. B., Prasad, R. C., Gurung, D. B., Sharma, D., Hamal, B., Bhandari, B., & Thapa, M. (2009). Rapid gains in yield and adoption of new maize varieties for complex hillside environments through farmer participation. II. Scaling-up the adoption through community-based seed production (CBSP). Field Crops Research, 111, 144–151. CrossRef
- Wilson, T. D., Brook, R. M., & Tomlinson, H. F. (1998). Interaction between Nere (Parkia biglobosa) and under-planted sorghum in a parkland system in Burkina Faso. Experimental Agriculture, 34, 85–98. CrossRef
- Effects of light environment on maize in hillside agroforestry systems of Nepal
Volume 4, Issue 1 , pp 103-114
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Zea mays
- Hillside systems
- Author Affiliations
- 1. CIMMYT, Dhaka, Gulshan, P.O. Box 6057, Bangladesh
- 2. School of the Environment, Natural Resources and Geography, College of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2UW, UK
- 3. Concern Worldwide 52/55 Lower Camden Street, Dublin 2, Ireland
- 4. World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, Kenya