Abstract
The building of professional learning communities has been widely recognized as an effective strategy for schools wanting to improve student performance and enhance teachers’ professional capacity. This study explored the relationship between leadership practices and professional learning communities, with a particular focus on the mediating role of trust in colleagues within the context of mainland China. A total of 215 primary school teachers in a province of southwestern China participated in the study. The results showed that leadership practices and trust in colleagues had positive effects on five factors of professional learning communities, namely a shared sense of purpose, collaborative activity, collective focus on student learning, deprivatized practice, and reflective dialog. Trust in colleagues also mediated the influence of leadership practices on professional learning communities. The implications for facilitating professional learning communities in mainland China are discussed here.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Stoll, L., Thomas, S., & Wallace, M. (2005). Creating and sustaining professional learning communities (Research report 637). London: General Teaching Council for England, Department for Education and Skills.
Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Day, C., & Sammons, P. (2013). Successful leadership: A review of the international literature. Reading: CfBT Education Trust.
Day, C., Sammons, P., Leithwood, K., Hopkins, D., Gu, Q., Brown, E., & Ahtaridou, E. (2011). School leadership and student outcomes: Building and sustaining success. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
DuFour, R., & DuFour, R. (2010). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press.
DuFour, R., & Fullan, M. (2013). Cultures built to last: Systemic PLCs at work. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press.
Forsyth, P. B., Adams, C. M., & Hoy, W. K. (2011). Collective trust: Why schools can’t improve without it. New York: Teachers College Press.
Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329–352.
Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142.
Hallinger, P., Lee, M., & Ko, J. (2014). Exploring the impact of school principals on teacher professional communities in Hong Kong. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(3), 229–259.
Hargreaves, A. (2007). Sustainable professional learning communities. In L. Stoll & K. Louis (Eds.), Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas (pp. 181–195). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Hargreaves, A. (2013). Push, pull and nudge: The future of teaching and educational change. In X. Zhu & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Preparing teachers for the 21st century (pp. 217–235). Berlin: Springer.
Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
Lee, J. C. K., Zhang, Z., & Yin, H. (2011). A multilevel analysis of the impact of a professional learning community, faculty trust in colleagues and collective efficacy on teacher commitment to students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 820–830.
Leithwood, K., Aitken, R., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Making school smarter: Leading with evidence (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Leithwood, K., Patten, S., & Jantzi, D. (2010). Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 671–706.
Li, L., Hallinger, P., & Walker, A. (2016). Exploring the mediating effects of trust on principal leadership and teacher professional learning in Hong Kong primary schools. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 44(1), 20–42.
Louis, K. S. (2006). Changing the culture of schools: Professional community, organizational learning, and trust. Journal of School Leadership, 16(5), 477–487.
Louis, K., Dretzke, B., & Wahlstrom, K. (2010). How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(3), 315–336.
Louis, K. S., Marks, H. M., & Kruse, S. (1996). Teachers’ professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33(4), 757–798.
Maele, V. D., Houtte, V. M., & Forsyth, B. P. (2014). Trust and school life: The role of trust for learning, teaching, leading and bridging. Dordrecht: Springer.
Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370–397.
Qian, H., & Walker, A. (2013). How principals promote and understand teacher development under curriculum reform in China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 304–315.
Sargent, T. C. (2015). Professional learning communities and the diffusion of pedagogical innovation in the Chinese education system. Comparative Education Review, 59(1), 102–132.
Sargent, T. C., & Hannum, E. (2009). Doing more with less teacher professional learning communities in resource-constrained primary schools in rural china. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 258–276.
Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 221–258.
Stoll, L., & Louis, K. (2007). Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Tschannen-Moran, M. (2014). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 547–593.
Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91.
Wahlstrom, K. L., & Louis, K. S. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 458–495.
Walker, A., & Qian, H. (2015). Review of research on school principal leadership in mainland China, 1998–2013: Continuity and change. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(4), 467–491.
Wang, T. (2015). Contrived collegiality versus genuine collegiality: Demystifying professional learning communities in Chinese schools. Compare, 45(6), 908–930.
Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246.
Wong, L. N. (2003). Changing roles and shifting authority of principals in China: A mixed role of manager and clan leader. Education and Society, 21(2), 37–54.
Wong, J. L. N. (2010a). What makes a professional learning community possible? A case study of a mathematics department in a junior secondary school of China. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(2), 131–139.
Wong, J. L. N. (2010b). Searching for good practice in teaching: A comparison of two subject-based professional learning communities in a secondary school in Shanghai. Compare, 40(5), 623–639.
Yin, H. (2013). Societal culture and teachers’ responses to curriculum reform: Experiences from China. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14(3), 391–401.
Yin, H., Lee, J. C. K., & Jin, Y. (2011). Teacher receptivity to curriculum reform and the need for trust: An exploratory study from Southwest China. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(1), 35–47.
Yin, H., Lee, J. C. K., & Wang, W. (2014). Dilemmas of leading national curriculum reform in a global era: A Chinese perspective. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 42(2), 293–311.
Zhang, J., & Pang, N. S. K. (2016). Exploring the characteristics of professional learning communities in China: A mixed-method study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(1), 11–21.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: The scales and items used in the study
Appendix: The scales and items used in the study
Leadership Practices Scale (LPS)
Principal in this school:
-
1.
Giving staff a sense of overall purpose.
-
2.
Developing school vision to staff and students.
-
3.
Assistant with short-term goal setting for teaching and learning.
-
4.
Demonstrating high expectations for staff.
-
5.
Giving staff support to improve teaching practice.
-
6.
Modeling a high level of professional practice.
-
7.
Showing caring and trust for me.
-
8.
Attaching importance to teacher professional development.
-
9.
Improving recruitment and retention of staff.
-
10.
Encouraging collaborative work among staff.
-
11.
Planning and working with family and community.
-
12.
Improving internal review of procedures.
-
13.
Strategic allocating resources.
-
14.
Working in collaboration with other schools.
-
15.
Restructuring the organization to facilitate work.
-
16.
Providing resources and technical assistance to help staff improve instruction.
-
17.
Regularly observing my classroom activities.
-
18.
After classroom activities, working with teachers to improve instruction.
-
19.
Buffering teachers from distractions.
-
20.
Using evidence of his/her interest in students’ progress.
-
21.
Clearly delivering the district policies.
Professional Learning Community Scale (PLCS)
-
1.
Most of my colleagues share my beliefs and values about what the central mission of the school should be.
-
2.
Our school goals and priorities are clear.
-
3.
In this school, teachers and the administration are in close agreement on school discipline policy.
-
4.
Within the current school year, I have frequently received useful suggestions for curriculum materials from colleagues in my department/division.
-
5.
Within the current school year, I have frequently received useful suggestions for teaching techniques and/or student activities from colleagues in my department/division.
-
6.
In our school, there is a great deal of cooperative effort among staff members on teaching and learning.
-
7.
I make a conscious effort to coordinate the content of my courses with other teachers.
-
8.
I meet regularly with colleagues to plan lessons, develop curriculum, evaluate programs, or engage in other collaborative work.
-
9.
The development of students’ high-level skills (reasoning, problem-solving, critical and creative thinking) is an important goal in my teaching.
-
10.
In our school, teachers focus on what and how well students are learning rather than on how they are teaching.
-
11.
Teachers in this school provide authentic teaching and learning for their students.
-
12.
A focused school vision for student learning is shared by most staff in this school.
-
13.
Two or more of my colleagues frequently observe my students’ academic performance or review grades/test scores.
-
14.
During the current school year, I have frequently visited another teacher’s classroom to observe and discuss his/her teaching (excluding monitoring students or substitute teachers).
-
15.
During the current school year, another teacher has frequently visited my classroom to observe my teaching (exclude visit by student teachers or those required for formal evaluations).
-
16.
During the current school year, I frequently received meaningful feedback on my performance from supervisors or peers.
-
17.
In a typical planning period with other teachers, we discuss problems of specific students and arrange appropriate help.
-
18.
In a typical planning period with other teachers, we discuss teaching practices and behaviors of team members.
Trust in Colleagues (TiC)
-
1.
Teachers in this school typically look out for each other.
-
2.
Even in difficult situations, teachers in this school can depend on each other.
-
3.
Teachers in this school have faith in the integrity of their colleagues.
-
4.
Teachers in this school do their jobs well.
-
5.
Teachers in this school are open with each other.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zheng, X., Yin, H., Liu, Y. et al. Effects of leadership practices on professional learning communities: the mediating role of trust in colleagues. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 17, 521–532 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016-9438-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016-9438-5