Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Civic education as a means of talent dissemination for gifted students

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the need for civic education as a mode of talent dissemination among gifted students. Based on a comprehensive review of literature, civic education was found to be instrumental for gifted students in developing academic, psychological, and social abilities; enhancing civic awareness, responsibility, and commitment; and taking the leading role to make a difference for local communities and the society. While there are only a few gifted programs for civic education, research evidence suggested that civic education programs such as Civic Education Institute consisting of rigorous academic content, hands-on activities, and ongoing reflections and evaluations enabled gifted students to get engaged with community, society, and world issues. This study concluded that civic education would be an effective means of talent dissemination as well as talent development for gifted students. Talent dissemination coupled with talent development should be the major task and ultimate goal of gifted education by the help of high-quality civic education programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alt, M. N., & Medrich, E. A. (1994). Student outcomes from participation in community service. Berkeley, CA: MPR Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, L. E., & Stanley, J. C. (2005). Youths who reason exceptionally well mathematically and/or verbally: Using the MVT:D4 model to develop their talents. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 20–37). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, J. R. (1998). Is service learning a good idea?: Data from the national longitudinal study of 1988. The Social Studies, 89(5), 205–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. (2013). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of gifted children at school and at home (8th ed.). Singapore: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cognetta, P. V., & Sprinthall, N. A. (1978). Students as teachers: Role taking as a means of promoting psychological and ethical development during adolescence. In N. A. Sprinthall & R. L. Mosher (Eds.), Value development as the aim of education (pp. 53–68). Schenectady, NY: Character Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, D., & Hedin, D. (1982). The impact of experiential education on adolescent development. Child and Youth Services, 4(3/4), 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, D., & Hedin, D. (1991). School-based community service: What we know from research and theory. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(10), 743–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The domain of creativity. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 191–212). Newbury Park, NJ: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. New York, NY: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, L. G., & Rinn, A. N. (2007). The role of gender and previous participation in a summer program on gifted adolescents’ self-concepts over time. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(3), 326–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. A., Rimm, S. B., & Siegle, D. (2011). Education of the gifted and talented (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyler, J., & Giles, D. (1999). Where’s the learning in service learning?. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, F. (1985). Giftedness and talent: Reexamining a reexamination of the definitions. GiftedChild Quarterly, 29(3), 103–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, F. (2003). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 60–74). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, F. (2005). From gifts to talents: The DMGT as a developmental model. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 98–119). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, S. (1996). RE: Right and responsibilities. Washington DC: Alliance for Rights and Responsibilities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M. U. M. (2004). Exceptionally gifted children (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, S. F., & Fenzel, L. M. (1988). The impact of volunteer experience on adolescent social development: Evidence of program effects. Journal of Adolescent Research, 3(1), 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Colbert, A. E., & Ilies, R. (2004). Intelligence and leadership: A quantitative review and test of theoretical propositions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 542–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karnes, F. A., & Bean, S. M. (Eds.). (1995). Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (2nd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnes, F. A., & Chauvin, J. C. (2000). Leadership development program. Scottsdale, AZ: Gifted Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnes, F. A., & D’Ilio, V. R. (1989). Leadership positions and sex role stereotyping among gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33(2), 76–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunin, M. M. (1997). Service learning and improved academic achievement: The national scene. In J. Schine (Ed.), Service learning: Ninety-sixth yearbook of the national society of the study of education (pp. 149–160). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.-Y., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2006). The emotional intelligence, moral judgment, and leadership of academically gifted adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(1), 29–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.-Y., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Donahue, R., & Weimholt, K. (2007). The effects of a service learning program on the development of civic attitudes and behaviors among academically talented adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31(2), 165–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.-Y., Matthews, M. S., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2008a). A national picture of talent search and talent search educational program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(1), 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.-Y., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Donahue, R., & Weimholt, K. (2008b). The Civic Leadership Institute: A service learning program for academically gifted youth. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18, 272–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.-Y., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Peternel, G. (2010). The efficacy of academic acceleration for gifted minority students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(3), 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, B. (1996). Serving others hooks gifted students on learning. Educational Leadership, 53, 70–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marland, S. P. Jr. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented. Report to the Congress of the United States by the U. S. commissioner of education (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

  • Matthews, M. S. (2004). Leadership education for gifted and talented youth: A review of the literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28(1), 77–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis, P. (2014). Service learning: A win-win for your students and the local community. Teaching for High Potential, 1, 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, S., & Liu, G. (1994). Service learning: An overview. Washington, DC: Corporation for National and Community Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, S. M. (2009). Myth 15: High-ability students don’t face problems and challenges. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(4), 274–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neihart, M. (1999). The impact of giftedness on psychological well-being: What does the empirical literature say? Roeper Review, 22(1), 10–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neihart, M. (2006). Achievement/affiliation conflicts in gifted adolescents. Roeper Review, 28, 196–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neihart, M. (2007). The socioaffective impact of acceleration and ability grouping: Recommendations for best practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(4), 330–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newmann, F. M., & Rutter, R. A. (1983). The effects of high school community service programs on students’ social development: Final report. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olszewski, P., Kulieke, M. J., & Willis, G. B. (1987). Changes in the self-perceptions of gifted students who participate in rigorous academic programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10(4), 287–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2004). Talent searches and accelerated programming for gifted students. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline & M. U. M. Gross (Eds.) A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students. Iowa City, IA: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development

  • Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Lee, S.-Y. (2008). Specialized programs serving the gifted. In F. A. Karnes & K. R. Stephens (Eds.), Achieving excellence: Educating the gifted and talented (pp. 192–208). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, R. E., Hammerich, S., & Hensley, C. (1998). Student effects of service learning: Tracking change across a semester. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 5, 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passow, A. H. (1988). Educating gifted persons who are caring and concerned. Roeper Review, 11(1), 13–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passow, A. H. (1989). Educating gifted persons who are caring and concerned. Gifted Education International, 6(1), 5–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J. S. (2009). Myth 17: Gifted and talented individuals do not have unique social and emotional needs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 280–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piechowski, M. M. (1997). Emotional giftedness: The measure of intrapersonal intelligence. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 366–381). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, S. M., & Housand, A. M. (2008). Characteristics of gifted and talented learners: Similarities and differences across domains. In F. A. Karnes & K. R. Stephens (Eds.), Achieving excellence: Educating the gifted and talented (pp. 62–81). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness?: Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(180-- 184), 261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (2002). Expanding the conception of giftedness to include co-cognitive traits and to promote social capital. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(33-- 40), 57–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (2003). Conception of giftedness and its relationship to the development of social capital. In N. Colangelo & D. G. A. (Eds.) Handbook of gifted education, Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

  • Renzulli, J. S. (2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 246–279). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how to guide for educational excellence (2nd ed.). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisk, D. A. (1993). Leadership education for the gifted. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 491–505). New York, NY: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, J., & Francis, M. (1988). The gifted program handbook: Planning, implementing, and evaluating gifted programs. Palo Alto, CA: Dale Semour Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Wisdom as a form of giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(4), 252–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2005). The WICS model of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 327–342). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2012). A proposed direction forward for gifted education based on psychological science. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(4), 176–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, A. J. (2003). Nature and nurture of giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 45–59). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry, A. W. (2000). An early glimpse: Service learning from an adolescent perspective. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11(3), 115–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A. S. (1997). An overview of service learning and the role of research and evaluation in service learning programs In A. S. Waterman (Ed.) Service learning: Applications from the research (pp. 1–11). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Willard, D. E. (1984). A “Social” social studies model for gifted students. Teaching Exceptional Children, 17(1), 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeldin, S., & Tarlov, S. (1997). Service learning as a vehicle for youth development In J. Schine (Ed.), Service learning: Ninety-sixth yearbook of the national society for the study of education (pp. 173–185). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2013S1A3A2055007).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seon-Young Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, SY. Civic education as a means of talent dissemination for gifted students. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 16, 307–316 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9372-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9372-y

Keywords

Navigation