Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Importance of outer reef slopes for commercially important fishes: implications for designing a marine protected area in the Philippines

  • Original Article
  • Biology
  • Published:
Fisheries Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A passive acoustic telemetry survey was conducted to determine occurrence patterns of commercially important fishes on a steep reef slope along a marine protected area (MPA) in the southern Philippines, where the outer reef edge is often set as an offshore MPA boundary. Based on 4–61 days of tracking data from 21 detected individuals of five species (Lutjanus argentimaculatus, Lutjanus monostigma, Lethrinus atkinsoni, Lethrinus obsoletus, and Siganus guttatus; 20.7–69.2 cm fork length) caught near the reef slope of the MPA, S. guttatus occurred most frequently on the reef flat of the MPA, whereas all individuals of the four lutjanid and lethrinid species were primarily (99.4–100%) detected near the reef slope, and nine individuals (56.3% of these four species) of three of these species (not L. obsoletus) most likely used the shallow (≤10 m) and deep (≥20 m) layers, and thus, middle layers of the slope. These findings indicate that commercially important lutjanid and lethrinid species predominantly and vertically used the areas near the reef slope, suggesting the importance of fully including reef slopes in MPAs to enhance their effectiveness for the conservation of such fishes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eristhee N, Oxenford HA (2001) Home range size and use of space by Bermuda chub Kyphosus sectatrix (L.) in two marine reserves in the Soufriere Marine Management Area, St Lucia, West Indies. J Fish Biol 59:129–151

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kaunda-Arara B, Rose GA (2004) Out-migration of tagged fishes from marine reef national parks to fisheries in coastal Kenya. Environ Biol Fishes 70:363–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tupper MH (2007) Spillover of commercially valuable reef fishes from marine protected areas in Guam, Micronesia. Fish Bull 105:527–537

    Google Scholar 

  4. Roberts CM, Polunin NVC (1993) Marine reserves: simple solutions to managing complex fisheries? Ambio 22:363–368

    Google Scholar 

  5. Teh LCL, Teh LSL, Starkhouse B, Sumaila UR (2009) An overview of socio-economic and ecological perspectives of Fiji’s inshore reef fisheries. Mar Policy 33:807–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kittinger JN (2013) Participatory fishing community assessments to support coral reef fisheries comanagement. Pac Sci 67:361–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cinner JE, Wamukota A, Randriamahazo H, Rabearisoa A (2009) Toward institutions for community-based management of inshore marine resources in the Western Indian Ocean. Mar Policy 33:489–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rowley RJ (1994) Marine reserves in fisheries management. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshwater Ecosyst 4:233–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Halpern BS, Warner RR (2003) Matching marine reserve design to reserve objectives. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:1871–1878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lowe CG, Topping DT, Cartamil DP, Papastamatiou YP (2003) Movement patterns, home range, and habitat utilization of adult kelp bass Paralabrax clathratus in a temperate no-take marine reserve. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 256:205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Popple ID, Hunte W (2005) Movement patterns of Cephalopholis cruentata in a marine reserve in St Lucia, Wl, obtained from ultrasonic telemetry. J Fish Biol 67:981–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gaines SD, White C, Carr MH, Palumbi SR (2010) Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:18286–18293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. McClanahan TR, Kaunda-Arara B (1996) Fishery recovery in a coral-reef marine park and its effect on the adjacent fishery. Conserv Biol 10:1187–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McClanahan TR, Mangi S (2000) Spillover of exploitable fishes from a marine park and its effect on the adjacent fishery. Ecol Appl 10:1792–1805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Willis TJ, Millar RB, Babcock RC (2003) Protection of exploited fish in temperate regions: high density and biomass of snapper Pagrus auratus (Sparidae) in northern New Zealand marine reserves. J Appl Ecol 40:214–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kellner JB, Tetreault I, Gaines SD, Nisbet RM (2007) Fishing the line near marine reserves in single and multispecies fisheries. Ecol Appl 17:1039–1054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Januchowski-Hartley FA, Graham NAJ, Cinner JE, Russ GR (2013) Spillover of fish naïveté from marine reserves. Ecol Lett 16:191–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Currey LM, Heupel MR, Simpfendorfer CA, Williams AJ (2015) Assessing fine-scale diel movement patterns of an exploited coral reef fish. Anim Biotelem 3:41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Matley JK, Heupel MR, Simpfendorfer CA (2015) Depth and space use of leopard coralgrouper Plectropomus leopardus using passive acoustic tracking. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 521:201–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Matley JK, Tobin AJ, Lédée EJI, Heupel MR, Simpfendorfer CA (2016) Contrasting patterns of vertical and horizontal space use of two exploited and sympatric coral reef fish. Mar Biol 163:253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Honda K, Nakamura Y, Nakaoka M, Uy WH, Fortes MD (2013) Habitat use by fishes in coral reef, seagrass bed and mangrove habitats in the Philippines. PLoS One 8:e65735

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Farmer NA, Ault JS, Smith SG, Franklin EC (2013) Methods for assessment of short-term coral reef fish movements within an acoustic array. Mov Ecol 1:7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kessel ST, Cooke SJ, Heupel MR, Hussey NE, Simpfendorfer CA, Vagle S, Fisk AT (2014) A review of detection range testing in aquatic passive acoustic telemetry studies. Rev Fish Biol Fish 24:199–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Stocks JR, Gray CA, Taylor MD (2014) Testing the effects of near-shore environmental variables on acoustic detections: implications on telemetry array design and data interpretation. Mar Technol Soc J 48:28–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Honda K, Uy WH, Baslot DI, Pantallano ADS, Nakamura Y, Nakaoka M (2016) Diel habitat-use patterns of commercially important fishes in a marine protected area in the Philippines. Aquat Biol 24:163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Alós J, March D, Palmer M, Grau A, Morales-Nin B (2011) Spatial and temporal patterns in Serranus cabrilla habitat use in the NW Mediterranean by acoustic telemetry. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 427:173–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Collins AB, Heupel MR, Motta PJ (2007) Residence and movement patterns of cownose rays Rhinoptera bonasus within a south-west Florida estuary. J Fish Biol 71:1159–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pincock DG (2008) False detections: what they are and how to remove them from detection data. Vemco, Amirix System, Halifax (Doc-004691-08)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Duong T (2007) ks: kernel density estimation and kernel discriminant analysis for multivariate data in R. J Stat Softw 21:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Simpfendorfer CA, Heupel MR, Hueter RE (2002) Estimation of short-term centers of activity from an array of omnidirectional hydrophones and its use in studying animal movements. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Payne NL, Gillanders BM, Webber DM, Semmens JM (2010) Interpreting diel activity patterns from acoustic telemetry: the need for controls. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 419:295–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Aspillaga E, Bartumeus F, Linares C, Starr RM, López-Sanz À, Díaz D, Zabala M, Hereu B (2016) Ordinary and extraordinary movement behaviour of small resident fish within a Mediterranean marine protected area. PLoS One 11:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Currey LM, Heupel MR, Simpfendorfer CA, Williams AJ (2014) Sedentary or mobile? Variability in space and depth use of an exploited coral reef fish. Mar Biol 161:2155–2166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hobson ES (1973) Diel feeding migrations in tropical reef fishes. Helgol Meeresun 24:361–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Krumme U (2009) Diel and tidal movements by fish and decapods linking tropical coastal ecosystems. In: Nagelkerken I (ed) Ecological connectivity among tropical coastal ecosystems. Springer Science and Business Media, Dordrecht, pp 271–324

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Le Pichon C, Coustillas J, Rochard E (2015) Using a multi-criteria approach to assess post-release recovery periods in behavioural studies: study of a fish telemetry project in the Seine Estuary. Anim Biotelem 3:30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Currey LM, Heupel MR, Simpfendorfer CA, Williams AJ (2015) Assessing environmental correlates of fish movement on a coral reef. Coral Reefs 34:1267–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the local government unit and fisherfolk of Barangay Tubajon, Laguindingan, particularly D. M. Gonzaga and J. Magdugo, E. Pajaron and M. Pajaron of Mantangale Alibuag Dive Resort, and T. G. Genovia of the Mindanao State University at Naawan for their collaborative efforts during the fieldwork. We are grateful to K. Nadaoka and E. Tsukamoto of the Tokyo Institute of Technology, M. D. Fortes of the University of the Philippines-Diliman, Y. Nagahama, Y. Geroleo, and S. Liong of the Japan International Cooperation Agency for their cooperation and assistance, and to the Mindanao State University at Naawan for the laboratory and technical support. We would also like to thank L. M. Currey of the Australian Institute of Marine Science and K. Suzuki of the Hokkaido National Fisheries Research Institute for their helpful advice. This study was supported by the Japan Science and Technology Agency/Japan International Cooperation Agency, Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development, as part of the Integrated Coastal Ecosystem Conservation and Adaptive Management under Local and Global Environmental Impacts in the Philippines (CECAM) project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kentaro Honda.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 8 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Honda, K., Uy, W.H., Baslot, D.I. et al. Importance of outer reef slopes for commercially important fishes: implications for designing a marine protected area in the Philippines. Fish Sci 83, 523–535 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-017-1082-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-017-1082-4

Keywords

Navigation