Understanding stalling demographic transition in high-fertility countries: a case study of Guatemala
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The debate surrounding the use of period, cohort, and tempo-adjusted measures has framed most of the recent studies evaluating the utility of macro-level fertility indicators. Period measures are susceptible to distortions, due to birth timing changes, but there is currently no universally accepted adjustment technique. Recent comparative analyses have offered some insights but only as applied to the low-fertility developed world setting. The utility of different types of measures in the high fertility context is unclear. Furthermore, regional variation in the pace of fertility transition is characteristic of many less developed countries and is rarely incorporated into macro-level analyses. The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate macro-fertility indicators at the regional and national levels in a high-fertility country, Guatemala, using the four most recent survey data sets. The results support the use of macro-level period indicators and adjusted period indicators of fertility in developing country contexts.
- Bertrand, J., Seiber, E. & Escudero, G. (2001).Contraceptive dynamics in Guatemala: 1978–1998. International family planning perspectives, 27(3), 112–118 & 136.
- Bongaarts, J (1999) The fertility impact of changes in the timing of childbearing in the developing world. Population Studies 53: pp. 277-289 CrossRef
- Bongaarts, J (2008) Fertility transitions in developing countries: Progress or stagnation?. Studies in Family Planning 39: pp. 105-110 CrossRef
- Bongaarts, J, Feeney, G (1998) On the quantum and tempo of fertility. Population and Development Review 24: pp. 271-291 CrossRef
- Broe, S, Hinde, A (2006) Diversity in fertility patterns in Guatemala. Population, Space and Place 12: pp. 435-459 CrossRef
- Broe, S, Hinde, A, Matthews, A, Padmadas, S (2005) Diversity in family planning use among ethnic groups in Guatemala. Journal of Biosocial Science 37: pp. 301-317
- Feeney, G (1991) Fertility decline in Taiwan: A study using parity progression ratios. Demography 28: pp. 467-479 CrossRef
- Frejka, T, Calot, G (2001) Cohort reproductive patterns in low-fertility countries. Population and Development Review 27: pp. 103-132 CrossRef
- Hill, K (2004) War, humanitarian crises, population displacement and fertility: A review of evidence. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
- Kim, YJ, Schoen, R (2000) On the quantum and tempo of fertility: Limits to the Bongaarts-Feeney adjustment. Population and Development Review 26: pp. 554-559 CrossRef
- Lutz, W, O’Neill, B, Scherbov, S (2003) Europe’s population at a turning point. Science 299: pp. 1991-1992 CrossRef
- McGinn, T (2000) Reproductive health of war-affected populations: What do we know?. International Family Planning Perspectives 26: pp. 174-180 CrossRef
- Ministerio de Salud Publica y Asistencia Social (MSPAS). (1989).Guatemala: Encuesta nacional de salud materno infantile.Technical report, MSPAS, Instituto Nacional de Estadistica (INE), Institute for Resource Development/Westinghouse. Columbia, MD: Institute for Resource Development/Westinghouse.
- Ministerio de Salud Publica y Asistencia Social (MSPAS). (1995).Guatemala: Encuesta nacional de salud materno infantile.Technical report, MSPAS, Instituto Nacional de Estadistica (INE), Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS). Calverton, MD: Macro International.
- Ministerio de Salud Publica y Asistencia Social (MSPAS). (1999). Guatemala: Encuesta nacional de salud materno infantile. Technical report, MSPAS, Instituto Nacional de Estadistica (INE), Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS). Calverton, MD: Macro International.
- Ministerio de Salud Publica y Asistencia Social (MSPAS). (2002). Guatemala: Encuesta nacional de salud materno infantile 2002 Informe Final.Technical report, MSPAS, Instituto Nacional de Estadistica (INE), Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Guatemala City: MSPAS-INE-CDC.
- Ni Bhrolchain, M (1992) Period paramount? A critique of the cohort approach to fertility. Population and Development Review 18: pp. 599-629 CrossRef
- Ni Bhrolchain, M. (2007).Why we measure period fertility. Southampton Statistical Science Research Institute, S3RI Applications Policy Working Papers, A07/04.
- Rosero-Bixby, L., Martin, T. C., & Martin-Garcia, T. (2008). Is Latin America starting to retreat from early and universal childbearing? Paper presented at the 2008 Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America Conference.
- Santiso-Galvez, R, Bertrand, JT (2004) The delayed contraceptive revolution in Guatemala. Human Organization 63: pp. 57-67
- Seiber, E, Bertrand, J (2002) Access as a factor in differential contraceptive use between Mayans and Ladinos in Guatemala. Health Policy and Planning 17: pp. 167-177 CrossRef
- Sheps, M, Menken, J (1973) Mathematical models of conception and birth. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
- Sobotka, T (2003) Tempo-quantum and period-cohort interplay in fertility changes in Europe. Evidence from the Czech Republic, Italy, the Netherlands and Sweden. Demographic Research 8: pp. 151-214 CrossRef
- World population prospects: The 2006 revision population database. New York, NY, USA
- Imhoff, E (2001) On the impossibility of inferring cohort fertility measures from period fertility measures. Demographic Research 5: pp. 23-64 CrossRef
- van Imhoff, E, Keilman, N (2000) On the quantum and tempo of fertility: Comment. Population and Development Review 26: pp. 549-553 CrossRef
- Yucesahin, MM, Ozgur, EM (2008) Regional fertility differences in Turkey: Persistent high fertility in the southeast. Population Space and Place 14: pp. 135-158 CrossRef
- Understanding stalling demographic transition in high-fertility countries: a case study of Guatemala
Journal of Population Research
Volume 30, Issue 1 , pp 19-37
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links