Skip to main content
Log in

Pre-tension effects from tightening the ligature on spinous process fracture risk in interspinous process device implantation

  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ligatures are used with many types of interspinous process devices to prevent instability in flexion movement by wrapping around upper and lower spinous processes. In this study, the effects of the pre-tension by tightening the ligature on the spinous process fracture were investigated using a finite element method. Five different interspinous process devices, Coflex-F®, Wallis, Diam, Viking, and Spear®, were chosen, and implanted after creating a defect consisting of bilateral facetectomy with a resection of the ligamentum flavum. Flexion and extension motions were simulated with various pre-tension values of the ligatures in the range of 0 to 400 N at 100 N increments. While stability at the surgical level in the flexion increased with increasing pre-tension of the ligatures, the spinous process fracture risk also increased with increasing ligature pre-tension. Furthermore, the fatigue life of the spinous process also decreased. Thus, the amount of pre-tension of the ligatures should be carefully selected depending on the materials and design of implants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Esses, S. I., Doherty, B. J., Crawford, M. J., and Dreyzin, V., “Kinematic Evaluation of Lumbar Fusion Techniques,” Spine, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 676–684, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee, C. K., “Lumbar Spinal Instability (Olisthesis) after Extensive Posterior Spinal Decompression,” Spine, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 429–433, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hilibrand, A. S. and Robbins, M., “Adjacent Segment Degeneration and Adjacent Segment Disease: The Consequences of Spinal Fusion?” The Spine Journal, Vol. 4, No. 6, pp. S190-S194, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Levin, D. A., Hale, J. J., and Bendo, J. A., “Adjacent Segment Degeneration following Spinal Fusion for Degenerative Disc Disease,” Bulletin-Hospital for Joint Diseases New York, Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 29, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fabrizi, A. P., Maina, R., and Schiabello, L., “Interspinous Spacers in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Disease: Our Experience with Diam and Aperius Devices,” European Spine Journal, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 20–26, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lo, C. C., Tsai, K. J., Chen, S. H., Zhong, Z. C., and Hung, C., “Biomechanical Effect after Coflex and Coflex Rivet Implantation for Segmental Instability at Surgical and Adjacent Segments: A Finite Element Analysis,” Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 11, pp. 969–978, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Richards, J. C., Majumdar, S., Lindsey, D. P., Beaupré, G. S., and Yerby, S. A., “The Treatment Mechanism of an Interspinous Process Implant for Lumbar Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication,” Spine, Vol. 30, No. 7, pp. 744–749, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Taylor, J., Pupin, P., Delajoux, S., and Palmer, S., “Device for Intervertebral Assisted Motion: Technique and Initial Results,” Neurosurgical Focus, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. E6–E6, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wilke, H. J., Drumm, J., Häussler, K., Mack, C., Steudel, W. I., and Kettler, A., “Biomechanical Effect of different Lumbar Interspinous Implants on Flexibility and Intradiscal Pressure,” European Spine Journal, Vol. 17, No. 8, pp. 1049–1056, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kettler, A., Drumm, J., Heuer, F., Haeussler, K., Mack, C., et al., “Can a Modified Interspinous Spacer Prevent Instability in Axial Rotation and Lateral Bending? A Biomechanical in Vitro Study Resulting in a New Idea,” Clinical Biomechanics, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 242–247, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mariottini, A., Pieri, S., Giachi, S., Carangelo, B., Zalaffi, A., et al., “Preliminary Results of a Soft Novel Lumbar Intervertebral Prothesis (DIAM) in the Degenerative Spinal Pathology Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, Vol. 92, pp. 129–131, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Barbagallo, G. M., Olindo, G., Corbino, L., and Albanese, V., “Analysis of Complications in Patients Treated with the X-Stop Interspinous Process Decompression System: Proposal for a Novel Anatomic Scoring System for Patient Selection and Review of the Literature,” Neurosurgery, Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 111–120, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bowers, C., Amini, A., Dailey, A. T., and Schmidt, M. H., “Dynamic Interspinous Process Stabilization: Review of Complications Associated with the X-Stop Device,” Neurosurgical Focus, Vol. 28, No. 6, p. E8, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zucherman, J. F. and Telles, C. J., “Commentary: Interspinous Devices, Spondylolisthesis, and Spinous Process-Related Complications,” The Spine Journal, Vol. 12, No. 6, pp. 473–475, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim, D. H., Shanti, N., Tantorski, M. E., Shaw, J. D., Li, L., et al., “Association between Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Spinous Process Fracture after Interspinous Process Spacer Surgery,” The Spine Journal, Vol. 12, No. 6, pp. 466–472, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim, D. H., Tantorski, M., Shaw, J., Martha, J., Li, L., et al., “Occult Spinous Process Fractures associated with Interspinous Process Spacers,” Spine, Vol. 36, No. 16, pp. E1080-E1085, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Park, W. M., Kim, K., and Kim, Y. H., “Effects of Degenerated Intervertebral Discs on Intersegmental Rotations, Intradiscal Pressures, and Facet Joint Forces of the Whole Lumbar Spine,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, Vol. 43, No. 9, pp. 1234–1240, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Goel, V. K., Monroe, B. T., Gilbertson, L. G., and Brinckmann, P., “Interlaminar Shear Stresses and Laminae Separation in a Disc: Finite Element Analysis of the L3-L4 Motion Segment Subjected to Axial Compressive Loads,” Spine, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 689–698, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim, K., Park, W. M., Kim, Y. H., and Lee, S., “Stress Analysis in a Pedicle Screw Fixation System with Flexible Rods in the Lumbar Spine,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, Vol. 224, No. 3, pp. 477–485, 2010.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Natarajan, R. N. and Andersson, G. B., “The Influence of Lumbar Disc Height and Cross-Sectional Area on the Mechanical Response of the Disc to Physiologic Loading,” Spine, Vol. 24, No. 18, pp. 1873–1881, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Natarajan, R. N., Chen, B. H., An, H. S., and Andersson, G. B., “Anterior Cervical Fusion: A Finite Element Model Study on Motion Segment Stability including the Effect of Osteoporosis,” Spine, Vol. 25, No. 8, pp. 955–961, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Park, W. M., Park, Y. S., Kim, K., and Kim, Y. H., “Biomechanical Comparison of Instrumentation Techniques in Treatment of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Finite Element Analysis,” Journal of Orthopaedic Science, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 443–449, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rohlmann, A., Zander, T., Schmidt, H., Wilke, H. J., and Bergmann, G., “Analysis of the Influence of Disc Degeneration on the Mechanical Behaviour of a Lumbar Motion Segment using the Finite Element Method,” Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 39, No. 13, pp. 2484–2490, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ruberté, L. M., Natarajan, R. N., and Andersson, G. B., “Influence of Single-Level Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease on the Behavior of the Adjacent Segments — a Finite Element Model Study,” Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 341–348, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schmidt, H., Heuer, F., Simon, U., Kettler, A., Rohlmann, A., et al., “Application of a New Calibration Method for a Three-Dimensional Finite Element Model of a Human Lumbar Annulus Fibrosus,” Clinical Biomechanics, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 337–344, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shirazi-Adl, A., Ahmed, A. M., and Shrivastava, S. C., “Mechanical Response of a Lumbar Motion Segment in Axial Torque Alone and Combined with Compression,” Spine, Vol. 11, No. 9, pp. 914–927, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vadapalli, S., Sairyo, K., Goel, V. K., Robon, M., Biyani, A., et al., “Biomechanical Rationale for using Polyetheretherketone (Peek) Spacers for Lumbar Interbody Fusion- a Finite Element Study,” Spine, Vol. 31, No. 26, pp. E992–E998, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bellini, C. M., Galbusera, F., Raimondi, M. T., Mineo, G. V., and Brayda-Bruno, M., “Biomechanics of the Lumbar Spine after Dynamic Stabilization,” Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 423–429, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zioupos, P., Wang, X., and Currey, J., “The Accumulation of Fatigue Microdamage in Human Cortical Bone of Two different Ages in Vitro,” Clinical Biomechanics, Vol. 11, No. 7, pp. 365–375, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Eberlein, R., Holzapfel, G. A., and Fröhlich, M., “Multi-Segment FEA of the Human Lumbar Spine including the Heterogeneity of the Annulus Fibrosus,” Computational Mechanics, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 147–163, 2004.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Bowman, S., Guo, X., Cheng, D., Keaveny, T., Gibson, L., et al., “Creep Contributes to the Fatigue Behavior of Bovine Trabecular Bone,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Vol. 120, No. 5, pp. 647–654, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Beer, F. P., Johnston, E. R., Dewolf, J. T., and Mazurek, D. F., “Mechanics of Materials,” McGraw-Hill, 5th Ed., p. 60, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoon Hyuk Kim.

Additional information

Won Man Park and Dae Kyung Choi contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, W.M., Choi, D.K., Kim, Y.H. et al. Pre-tension effects from tightening the ligature on spinous process fracture risk in interspinous process device implantation. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 15, 2597–2604 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-014-0632-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-014-0632-2

Keywords

Navigation