Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A New SEYHAN’s Approach in Case of Heterogeneity of Regression Slopes in ANCOVA

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, when the assumptions of linearity and homogeneity of regression slopes of conventional ANCOVA are not met, a new approach named as SEYHAN has been suggested to use conventional ANCOVA instead of robust or nonlinear ANCOVA. The proposed SEYHAN’s approach involves transformation of continuous covariate into categorical structure when the relationship between covariate and dependent variable is nonlinear and the regression slopes are not homogenous. A simulated data set was used to explain SEYHAN’s approach. In this approach, we performed conventional ANCOVA in each subgroup which is constituted according to knot values and analysis of variance with two-factor model after MARS method was used for categorization of covariate. The first model is a simpler model than the second model that includes interaction term. Since the model with interaction effect has more subjects, the power of test also increases and the existing significant difference is revealed better. We can say that linearity and homogeneity of regression slopes are not problem for data analysis by conventional linear ANCOVA model by helping this approach. It can be used fast and efficiently for the presence of one or more covariates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huitema BE (2011) The analysis of covariance and alternatives: statistical methods for experiments, quasi experiments, and single-case studies, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Keppel G, Wickens TD (2004) Design and analysis: a researcher’s handbook, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  3. Harwell M (2003) Summarizing Monte Carlo results in methodological research: the single-factor, fixed-effects ANCOVA case. J Educ Behav Stat 28:45–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lazar AA, Zerbe GO (2011) Solutions for determining the significance region using the Johnson-Neyman type procedure in generalized linear (Mixed) models. J Educ Behav Stat 36(6):699–719

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Miller JW, Stromeyer WR, Schwieterman MA (2013) Extensions of the Johnson-Neyman technique to linear models with curvilinear effects: derivations and analytical tools. Multivar Behav Res 48(2):267–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. O’Connor BP (1998) SIMPLE: all-in-one programs for exploring interactions in moderated multiple regression. Educ Psychol Measur 58:836–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilcox RR (1997) ANCOVA based on comparing a robust measure of location at empirically determined design points. Br J Math Stat Psychol 50:93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilcox RR (2016) ANCOVA: a global test based on a robust measure of location or quantiles when there is curvature. J Modern Appl Stat Methods 15(1):12–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mayer A, Nagengast B, Fletcher J, Steyer R (2014) Analyzing average and conditional effects with multigroup multilevel structural equation models. Front Psychol 5:304

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. D’Alonzo KT (2004) The Johnson-Neyman procedure as an alternative to ANCOVA. West J Nurs Res 26(7):804–812

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Rast P, Rush J, Piccinin A, Hofer SM (2014) The identification of regions of significance in the effect of multimorbidity on depressive symptoms using longitudinal data: an application of the Johnson-Neyman technique. Gerontology 60:274–281

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Moses T, Klockars A (2005) Testing for aptitude-treatment interactions in analysis of covariance and randomized block designs under assumption violations. J Modern Appl Stat Methods 4(2):460–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu YB (1984) The effects of heterogeneous regression slopes on the robustness of two test statistics in the analysis of covariance. Educ Psychol Measur 44:647–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Friedman JH (1991) Multivariate adaptive regression splines. Ann Stat 19(1):1–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Barron AR, Xiangyu X (1991) Discussion on Friedman’s multivariate adaptive regression. Ann Stat 19(1):67–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Harwell MR, Serlin RC (1988) An empirical study of a proposed test of nonparametric analysis of covariance. Psychol Bull 104(2):268–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Soyoung K (2010) Alternatives to analysis of covariance for heterogeneous regression slopes in educational research. Korean J Teacher Educ 26(1):73–91

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rutherford A (1992) Alternatives to traditional analysis of covariance. Br J Math Stat Psychol 45:197–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim S (2007) Type I error rate and statistical power of ANCOVA, Potthoff’s modified Johnson–Neyman method, and Wilcox Trimmed mean method in randomized two-group experiment design. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Georgia, Georgia

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sengul Cangur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ankarali, H., Cangur, S. & Ankarali, S. A New SEYHAN’s Approach in Case of Heterogeneity of Regression Slopes in ANCOVA. Interdiscip Sci Comput Life Sci 10, 282–290 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12539-016-0189-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12539-016-0189-0

Keywords

Navigation