Abstract
Members of the Formin Binding Protein 4 Family or the FNBP4 were indirectly reported to be associated with many of the biological processes. These proteins possess two WW domains. So far there are practically no reports regarding the characterization and classification of the protein by any means. Keeping in mind the importance of the proteins from this FNBP4 family, we have tried an in silico approach to come up with a comprehensive analysis of the proteins. We have analyzed the proteins by considering their sequence conservation, their phylogenetic distributions among the different organisms. We have also investigated the functional properties of the WW domains in the proteins. Finally, we have made an attempt to elucidate the structural details of the domains and predicted the possible modes of their interactions. Our findings show that FNBP4 is eukaryotic in its distribution and follows a trend of evolution where animal and plant homologues have evolved in an independent manner. While the WW domain is the only common motif present across the FNBP4 family of proteins, there are different classes (mainly two) of WW domains that are found among different FNBP4 proteins. Structure function predictions indicate a possible role of FNBP4 in either protein stabilization control or transcript processing. Our study on FNBP4 may therefore open up new avenues to generate new interest in this highly important but largely unexplored class of proteins. Future studies with proteins from this family may answer many important questions of protein-protein interactions in different biologically important processes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, M., Friedler, A., Schon, O., Bycroft, M. 2002. The structure of an FF domain from human HYPA/FBP11. J Mol Biol. 323, 411–416.
Altschul, S.F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E.W., Lipman, D.J. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 215, 403–410.
Arnold, K., Bordoli, L., Kopp, J., Schwede, T. 2006. The SWISS-MODEL Workspace: A web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics. 22, 195–201.
Aspenström, P. 2010. Formin-binding proteins: modulators of formin-dependent actin polymerization. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1803, 174–182.
Bartolini. F., Gundersen, G.G. 2010. Formins and microtubules. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1803, 164–173.
Bateman, A., Coin, L., Durbin, R., Finn, R.D., Hollich, V., Griffiths-Jones, S., Khanna, A., Marshall, M., Moxon, S., Sonnhammer, E.L., Studholme, D.J., Yeats, C., Eddy, S.R. 2012. The Pfam protein families database. Nucl. Acids Res. Database Issue 40, D290–D301.
Bohne. J., Cole, S.E., Suñe, C., Lindman, B.R., Ko, V.D., Vogt, T.F., Garcia-Blanco, M.A. 2000. Expression analysis and mapping of the mouse and human transcriptional regulator CA150. Mamm Genome. 11, 930–933.
Bonet, R., Ruiz, L., Morales, B., Macias, M.J. 2009. Solution structure of the fourth FF domain of yeast Prp40 splicing factor. Proteins. 77, 1000–1003.
Bowie, J.U., Lüthy, R., Eisenberg, D. 1991. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science. 253, 164–170.
Chalkia, D., Nikolaidis, N., Makalowski, W., Klein, J., Nei, M. 2008. Origins and evolution of the formin multigene family that is involved in the formation of actin filaments. Mol Biol Evol. 25, 2717–2733.
Chan, D.C., Bedford, M.T., Leder, P. 1996. Formin binding proteins bear WWP/WW domains that bind proline-rich peptides and functionally resemble SH3 domains. EMBO J. 15, 1045–1054.
Cole, C., Barber, J.D. Barton, G.J. 2008. The Jpred 3 secondary structure prediction server. Nucl. Acids Res. 35, W197–W201.
Courtemanche, N., Pollard, T.D. 2012. Determinants of Formin Homology 1 (FH1) domain function in actin filament elongation by formins. J Biol Chem. 287, 7812–7820.
Crooks, G.E., Hon, G., Chandonia, J.M., Brenner, S.E. 2004. WebLogo: A sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 14, 1188–1190.
Dames, S.A., Junemann, A., Sass, H.J., Schönichen, A., Stopschinski, B.E., Grzesiek, S., Faix, J., Geyer, M. 2011. Structure, dynamics, lipid binding, and physiological relevance of the putative GTPase-binding domain of Dictyostelium formin C. J Biol Chem. 286, 36907–36920.
Das, A., Bhattacharya, S., Bagchi, A., Dasgupta, R. 2013. Structural insight into the formin binding property of human formin binding protein 4. J Proteins and Proteomics 4, 93–100.
Dephoure, N., Zhou, C., Villén, J., Beausoleil, S.A., Bakalarski, C.E., Elledge, S.J., Gygi, S.P. 2008. A quantitative atlas of mitotic phosphorylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 105, 10762–10767.
Depraetere, V., Golstein, P. 1999. WW domaincontaining FBP-30 is regulated by p53. Cell Death Differ. 6, 883–889.
DeWard, A.D., Eisenmann, K.M., Matheson, S.F., Alberts, A.S. 2010. The role of formins in human disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1803, 226–233.
Ester, C., Uetz, P. 2008. The FF domains of yeast U1 snRNP protein Prp40 mediate interactions with Luc7 and Snu71. BMC Biochem. 9, 29.
Faix, J., Grosse, R. 2006. Staying in shape with formins. Dev Cell. 10, 693–706.
Finn, R.D, Mistry, J., Tate, J., Coggill, P., Heger, A., Pollington, J.E., Gavin, O.L., Gunesekaran, P., Ceric, G., Forslund, K., Holm, L., Sonnhammer, E.L., Eddy, S.R., Bateman, A. 2010. The Pfam protein families database. Nucl. Acids Res. Database Issue 38, D211–222.
Gasch, A., Wiesner, S., Martin-Malpartida, P., Ramirez-Espain, X., Ruiz, L., Macias, M.J. 2006. The structure of Prp40 FF1 domain and its interaction with the crn-TPR1 motif of Clf1 gives a new insight into the binding mode of FF domains. J Biol Chem. 281, 356–364.
Goode, B.L., Eck, M.J. 2007. Mechanism and function of formins in the control of actin assembly. Annu Rev Biochem. 76, 593–627.
Görnemann, J., Barrandon, C., Hujer, K., Rutz, B., Rigaut, G., Kotovic, K.M., Faux, C., Neugebauer, K.M., Séraphin, B. 2011. Cotranscriptional spliceosome assembly and splicing are independent of the Prp40p WW domain. RNA. 17, 2119–2129.
Guindon, S., Dufayard, J.F., Lefort, V., Anisimova, M., Hordijk, W., Gascuel, O. 2010. New Algorithms and Methods to Estimate Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies: Assessing the Performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology, 59, 307–321.
Higgs, H.N. 2005. Formin proteins: a domain-based approach. Trends Biochem Sci. 30, 342–353.
Higgs, H.N., Peterson, K.J. 2005. Phylogenetic analysis of the formin homology 2 domain. Mol Biol Cell. 16, 1–13.
Holm, L., Rosenström, P. 2010. Dali server: conservation mapping in 3D. Nucl. Acids Res. 38, W545–549.
Huang, X., Beullens, M., Zhang, J., Zhou, Y., Nicolaescu, E., Lesage, B., Hu, Q., Wu, J., Bollen, M., Shi, Y. 2009. Structure and function of the two tandem WW domains of the pre-mRNA splicing factor FBP21 (formin-binding protein 21). J Biol Chem. 284, 25375–25387.
Ingham, R.J., Colwill, K., Howard, C., Dettwiler, S., Lim, C.S., Yu, J., Hersi, K., Raaijmakers, J., Gish, G., Mbamalu, G., Taylor, L., Yeung, B., Vassilovski, G., Amin, M., Chen, F., Matskova, L., Winberg, G., Ernberg, I., Linding, R., O’donnell, P., Starostine, A., Keller, W., Metalnikov, P., Stark, C., Pawson, T. 2005. WW domains provide a platform for the assembly of multiprotein networks. Mol Cell Biol. 25, 7092–7106.
Kao, H.Y., Siliciano, P.G. 1996. Identification of Prp40, a novel essential yeast splicing factor associated with the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle. Mol Cell Biol. 16, 960–967.
Kiefer, F., Arnold, K., Künzli, M., Bordoli, L., Schwede, T. 2009. The SWISS-MODEL Repository and associated resources. Nucl. Acids Res. 37, D387–D392.
Klippel, S., Wieczorek, M., Schümann, M., Krause, E., Marg, B., Seidel, T., Meyer, T., Knapp, E.W., Freund, C. 2011. Multivalent binding of formin-binding protein 21 (FBP21)-tandem-WW domains fosters protein recognition in the pre-spliceosome. J Biol Chem. 286, 38478–38487.
Liou, Y.C., Zhou, X.Z., Lu, K.P. 2011. Prolyl isomerase Pin1 as a molecular switch to determine the fate of phosphoproteins. Trends Biochem Sci. 36, 501–514.
Liu, R., Linardopoulou, E.V., Osborn, G.E., Parkhurst, S.M. 2010. Formins in development: orchestrating body plan origami. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1803, 207–225.
Lüthy, R., Bowie, J.U., Eisenberg, D. 1992. Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Nature. 356, 83–85.
Matsuoka, S., Ballif, B.A., Smogorzewska, A., McDonald, E.R. 3rd., Hurov, K.E., Luo, J., Bakalarski, C.E., Zhao, Z., Solimini, N., Lerenthal, Y., Shiloh, Y., Gygi, S.P., Elledge, S.J. 2007. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science. 316, 1160–1166.
Mayya, V., Lundgren, D.H., Hwang, S.I., Rezaul, K., Wu, L., Eng, J.K., Rodionov, V., Han, D.K. 2009. Quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis of T cell receptor signaling reveals system-wide modulation of protein-protein interactions. Sci Signal 2, ra46.
McFie, P.J., Wang, G.L., Timchenko, N.A., Wilson, H.L., Hu, X., Roesler, W.J. 2006. Identification of a corepressor that inhibits the transcriptional and growtharrest activities of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha. J Biol Chem. 281, 18069–18080.
Molina, H., Horn, D.M., Tang, N., Mathivanan, S., Pandey, A. 2007. Global proteomic profiling of phosphopeptides using electron transfer dissociation tandem mass spectrometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 104, 2199–2204.
Morris, D.P., Greenleaf, A.L. 2000. The splicing factor, Prp40, binds the phosphorylated carboxyl-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II. J Biol Chem. 275, 39935–39943.
Murphy, M.W., Olson, B.L., Siliciano, P.G. 2004. The yeast splicing factor Prp40p contains functional leucine-rich nuclear export signals that are essential for splicing. Genetics. 166, 53–65.
Nguyen, Ba. A.N., Pogoutse, A., Provart, N., Moses, A.M. 2009. NLStradamus: a simple Hidden Markov Model for nuclear localization signal prediction. BMC Bioinformatics. 10, 202.
Olsen, J.V., Blagoev, B., Gnad, F., Macek, B., Kumar, C., Mortensen, P., Mann, M. 2006. Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell. 127, 635–648.
Peitsch, M. C. 1995. Protein modeling by E-mail. Bio/Technology 13, 658–660.
Pieper, U., Eswar, N., Braberg, H., Madhusudhan, M.S., Davis, F.P., Stuart, A.C., Mirkovic, N., Rossi, A., Marti-Renom, M.A., Fiser, A., Webb, B., Greenblatt, D., Huang, C.C., Ferrin, T.E., Sali, A. 2004. MODBASE, a database of annotated comparative protein structure models, and associated resources. Nucl. Acids Res. 32, D217–222.
Ramirez-Espain, X., Ruiz, L., Martin-Malpartida, P., Oschkinat, H., Macias, M.J. 2007. Structural characterization of a new binding motif and a novel binding mode in group 2 WW domains. J Mol Biol. 373, 1255–1268.
Rigbolt, K.T., Prokhorova, T.A., Akimov, V., Henningsen, J., Johansen, P.T., Kratchmarova, I., Kassem, M., Mann, M., Olsen, J.V., Blagoev, B. 2011. Systemwide temporal characterization of the proteome and phosphoproteome of human embryonic stem cell differentiation. Sci Signal 4, rs3.
Salah, Z., Alian, A., Aqeilan, R.I. 2012. WW domaincontaining proteins: retrospectives and the future. Front Biosci. 17, 331–348.
Shimada, M., Saito, M., Katakai, T., Shimizu, A., Ichimura, T., Omata, S., Horigome, T. 1999. Molecular cloning and splicing isoforms of mouse p144, a homologue of CA150. J Biochem. 126, 1033–1042.
Smith, M.J., Kulkarni, S., Pawson, T. 2004. FF domains of CA150 bind transcription and splicing factors through multiple weak interactions. Mol Cell Biol. 24, 9274–9285.
Sudol, M., Chen, H.I., Bougeret, C., Einbond, A., Bork, P. 1995. Characterization of a novel proteinbinding module the WW domain. FEBS Lett. 369, 67–71.
Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M., Kuma, r S. 2011. MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Mol Biol Evol. 28, 2731–2739.
Young, K.G., Copeland, J.W. 2010. Formins in cell signaling. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1803, 183–190.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Das, A., Bhattacharya, S., Bagchi, A. et al. In-silico characterization of Formin Binding Protein 4 Family of proteins. Interdiscip Sci Comput Life Sci 7, 43–64 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12539-013-0040-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12539-013-0040-9