Abstract
Background
Psychological treatments are recognised as generally effective for chronic pain. However, little is known about the evidence for psychological treatments for chronic pain in Asia.
Purpose
This study aimed (1) to identify all treatment outcome studies in the area of psychological approaches to chronic pain in adult populations of East Asia and Southeast Asia and (2) to evaluate the treatment types, the evidence for treatment outcomes and research design quality with regard to these studies.
Methods
We identified all psychologically based treatment outcome studies for chronic pain in East and Southeast Asia by searching CENTRAL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, MEDLINE (via Ovid), Global Health and Web of Science from the beginning of each abstracting service until December 2014 (week 4).
Results
Seventeen studies met inclusion criteria including a total of N = 1,890 participants. Four were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), five controlled clinical trials (CCTs) and eight cohort studies. Treatment outcomes included pain, disability, depression and anxiety. Overall, the studies included in this review showed small to medium within-group effect sizes for all four outcomes. A majority of the studies were rated as weak in design quality. Three RCTs were found to be of strong quality, one of moderate quality and only one CCT of moderate quality.
Conclusion
The current available literature on psychological treatments for chronic pain in East and Southeast Asia is generally small in scale, mostly preliminary and lags behind on some developments occurring in North America and Europe. Further development of treatment methods and research designs is warranted.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridd V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006;10(4):287–333.
Miller LR, Cano A. Comorbid chronic pain and depression: who is at risk? J Pain. 2009;10:619–27.
Eccleston C, Williams AC, Morley S. Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headaches) in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007407.pub2.
Williams ACDC, Eccleston C, Morley S. Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007407.pub3.
Kitahara M, Kojima KK, Ohmura A. Efficacy of interdisciplinary treatment for chronic non-malignant pain patients in Japan. Clin J Pain. 2006;22(7):647–55.
Shiotani M. Review and history of multidisciplinary pain clinic. Pain Clin. 2001;22:606–16.
Cardosa M, Osman ZL, Nicholas M, Tonkin L, Williams A, Abd Aziz K, et al. Self-management of chronic pain in Malaysian patients: effectiveness trial with 1-year follow-up. TMB. 2012;2:30–7.
Nicholas MK, Cardosa M, Chen PP. Developing multidisciplinary cognitive–behavioral pain management programs in Asia. In: Flor H, Kalso E, Dostrovsky JO, editors. Proceedings of the 11th World Congress on Pain, Progress in Pain Research and Management, vol. 18. Seattle: IASP Press; 2006. p. 773–88.
Tan EPG, Tan ESL, Ng BY. Efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for patients with chronic pain in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2009;38:952–9.
Lubis DU, Jaya ES, Arjadi R, Hanum L, Astri K, Putri MDD. Preliminary study on the effectiveness of short group cognitive behavioral therapy (GCBT) on Indonesian older adults. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):1–10.
Hayes SC, Muto T, Masuda A. Seeking cultural competence from the ground up. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2011;18:232–7.
Sue S, Zane N, Nagayama Hall GC, Berger LK. The case for cultural competency in psychotherapeutic interventions. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:525–48.
Hoffman BM, Papas RK, Chatkoff DK, Kerns RD. Meta-analysis of psychological interventions for chronic low back pain. Health Psychol. 2007;26(1):1–9.
Veehof MM, Oskam M-J, Schreurs KMG, Bohlmeijer ET. Acceptance-based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain. 2011;152:533–42.
Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies: http://www.ephpp.ca/tools.html. Accessed May 2014.
Yip YB, Sit JWH, Wong DYS. A quasi-experimental study on improving arthritis self-management for residents of an aged people’s home in Hong Kong. Psychol Health Med. 2004;9(2):235–46.
Yip YB, Sit JW, Fung KKY, Wong DYS, Chong SYC, Chung LH, et al. Impact of an arthritis self-management programme with an added exercise component for osteoarthritic knee sufferers on improving pain, functional outcomes, and use of health care services: an experimental study. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65:113–21.
Oh HY, Seo WS. Decreasing pain and depression in a health promotion program for people with rheumatoid arthritis. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2003;35(2):127–32.
Vong SK, Cheing GL, Chan F, So EM, Chan CC. Motivational enhancement therapy in addition to physical therapy improves motivational factors and treatment outcomes in people with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:176–83.
Li EJQ, Li-Tsang CWP, Lam CS, Hui KYL, Chan CCH. The effect of a “training on work readiness” program for workers with musculoskeletal injuries: a randomized control trial (RCT) study. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16:529–41.
Tse MMY, Vong SKS, Tang SK. Motivational interviewing and exercise programme for community-dwelling older persons with chronic pain: a randomised controlled study. J Clin Nurs. 2013;22:1843–56.
Wong SYS, Chan FWK, Wong RLP, Chu MC, Lam YYK, Chu MC. Comparing the effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction and multidisciplinary intervention programs for chronic pain—a randomised comparative trial. Clin J Pain. 2011;27(8):724–34.
Prochaska J, DiClemente C, Norcross J. In search of how people change: application to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol. 1992;47:1102–14.
Chan WLS, Hui E, Chan C, Cheung D, Wong S, Wong R, et al. Evaluation of chronic disease self-management programme (CDSMP) for older adults in Hong Kong. JNHA. 2011;15(3):209–14.
Elsegood KJ, Wongpakaran N. The effects of guided imagery on affect, cognition and pain in older adults in residential care. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2011;5(2):114–22.
Lau OWY, Leung LNY, Wong LOL. Cognitive behavioural techniques for changing the coping skills of patients with chronic pain. HKJOT. 2002;12:13–20.
Man AKY, Chu MC, Chen PP, Ma M, Gin T. Clinical experience with a chronic pain management programme in Hong Kong Chinese patients. Hong Kong Med J. 2007;13:372–8.
Abdul Jalil N, Sulaiman Z, Awang MS, Omar M. Retrospective review of outcomes of a multimodal chronic pain service in major teaching hospital: a preliminary experience in Universiti Sains Malaysia. Malays J Med Sci. 2009;16(4):55–65.
Matsubara T, Arai YCP, Shimo K, Sato J, Osuga T, Nishihara M, et al. Effects of cognitive–behavioral therapy on pain intensity and level of physical activity in Japanese patients with chronic pain—a preliminary quasi experimental study. J Phys Ther. 2010;1:49–57.
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press; 1988.
Turk DC, Meichenbaum D, Genest M. Pain and behavioural medicine: a cognitive–behavioral perspective. New York: Guilford Press; 1983.
Flor H, Fydrich T, Turk DC. Efficacy of multidisciplinary pain treatment centers: a meta-analytic review. Pain. 1992;49:221–30.
Morley SJ, Eccleston C, de C Williams AC. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of cognitive behaviour therapy and behaviour therapy for chronic pain in adults, excluding headache. Pain. 1999;80:1–13.
Kim DM, Wampold BE, Bolt DM. Therapist effects in psychotherapy: random effects modeling of the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program data. Psychother Res. 2006;16:161–72.
Wampold BE, Serlin RC. The consequence of ignoring a nested factor on measures of effect size in analysis of variance. Psychol Methods. 2000;5(4):425–33.
Lewis M, Morley S, van der Windt DA, Hay E, Jellema P, Dziedzic K, et al. Measuring practitioner/therapist effects in randomised trials of low back pain and neck pain interventions in primary care settings. Eur J Pain. 2010;14:1033–9.
Kerry SM, Bland JM. The intracluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomization. BMJ. 1998;316:1455.
Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, et al. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2005;113:9–19.
Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. BMJ. 2011. doi:10.1136/bmj.d5928.
McCracken LM, Morley S. The psychological flexibility model: a basis for integration and progress in psychological approaches to chronic pain management. J Pain. 2014;15:221–34.
Informed Consent Statement
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
Conflict of Interest
Su-Yin Yang, Lance McCracken and Rona Moss-Morris declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1
Search Strategy
Search Terms for Pain
-
1
exp chronic pain/
-
2
“chronic pain”.mp.
-
3
exp fibromyalgia/
-
4
“fibromyalgia”.mp.
-
5
exp rheumatoid arthritis/
-
6
(“arthritis” or “osteoarthritis”).mp.
-
7
exp low back pain/
-
8
“low back pain”.mp.
-
9
exp musculoskeletal pain/ or exp myofascial pain/
-
10
“musculoskeletal pain”.mp.
Search Terms for Psychological Treatment
-
11
exp psychotherapy/
-
12
“psychotherapy”.mp.
-
13
exp cognitive therapy/
-
14
“cognitive therapy”.mp.
-
15
“cognitive behavio$r therapy”.mp.
-
16
exp behavior therapy/
-
17
“behavio$r therapy”.mp.
-
18
(“acceptance and commitment therapy”).mp.
-
19
“mindfulness”.mp.
-
20
exp coping behavior/
-
21
“coping skills”.mp.
-
22
exp self care/
-
23
“self management”.mp.
-
24
exp psychoeducation/ or exp education/ or exp health education/
-
25
“psychoeducation”.mp.
Search Terms for Countries in South-East Asia
-
26
26 exp Asia/ or exp Southeast Asia/
-
27
“Southeast Asia”.mp.
-
28
“East Asia”.mp.
-
29
“Singapore”.mp.
-
30
“Singapore$”.mp.
-
31
“Cambodia”.mp.
-
32
“Cambodia$”.mp.
-
33
“Thailand”.mp.
-
34
“Thai$”.mp.
-
35
“Indonesia”.mp.
-
36
“Indonesia$”.mp.
-
37
“Malaysia”.mp.
-
38
“Malaysia$”.mp.
-
39
(“Philippines” or “Filipino”).mp.
-
40
“Laos”.mp.
-
41
“Lao$”.mp.
-
42
“Myanmar”.mp.
-
43
“Myanm$”.mp.
-
44
“Vietnam”.mp.
-
45
“Vietnam$”.mp.
-
46
“Brunei”.mp.
-
47
“Brunei$”.mp.
-
48
“East Timor”.mp.
-
49
“East Timor$”.mp.
-
50
“China”.mp.
-
51
“Chinese”.mp.
-
52
“Japan”.mp.
-
53
“Japan$”.mp.
-
54
“Hong Kong”.mp.
-
55
“Macau”.mp.
-
56
“Taiwan”.mp.
-
57
“Taiwan$”.mp.
-
58
“Mongolia”.mp.
-
59
“Mongolia$”.mp.
-
60
“Korea”.mp.
-
61
“North Korea”.mp.
-
62
“South Korea”.mp.
-
63
“Korea$”.mp.
Appendix 2
Items Included in the Data Extraction Sheet
-
1.
Study ID
-
2.
Date of data extraction
-
3.
Identification features of the study [author(s), article title, source (Journal, year, volume, pages, country of origin), institutional affiliation (first author)]
-
4.
Study characteristics [sample size, population from which study was drawn, inclusion/exclusion criteria, recruitment procedures]
-
5.
Characteristics of participants at intervention commencement [age, ethnicity, sex, diagnosis, pain duration, % agreed to participate, number of participants randomised in each condition (for randomised trials), intervention and control groups comparable at baseline, blinding]
-
6.
Methods [design, type of study, objectives specified in Methods section]
-
7.
Interventions [number of conditions (including control condition), description of intervention, duration of intervention, who delivers the intervention, what special training was provided for treatment delivery providers, was the intervention manualised]
-
8.
Outcomes, outcome measures [measures at baseline, primary outcome (pain, disability, depression, anxiety), measures at end of treatment]
-
9.
Reported outcomes [when and how the measurement was conducted, follow-up period, measures at follow-up, statistical technique used, attrition rate and whether attrition was adequately dealt with]
-
10.
Results [main findings]
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, SY., McCracken, L.M. & Moss-Morris, R. Psychological Treatments for Chronic Pain in East and Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review. Int.J. Behav. Med. 23, 473–484 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-015-9481-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-015-9481-3