Skip to main content
Log in

The Association of Type 2 Diabetes Patient and Spouse Illness Representations with Their Well-being: A Dyadic Approach

  • Published:
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to examine the relation between certain illness representations and the physical and psychological well-being of persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus and their spouses.

Purpose

In this study, we examined the relation of type 2 diabetes patients and their spouses’ representations of illness consequences and timeline (chronicity and cyclicality/predictability) to the physical and psychological well-being of both. The interaction between patient and spouse illness representations was also studied.

Methods

A dyadic analysis approach was employed, while the Actor–Partner Interdependence Model was used to examine dyadic effects. One hundred and sixty-eight individuals nested in 84 couples participated.

Results

Regarding illness representations, both actor (i.e., the effects of a person’s own characteristics on own outcomes) and partner (i.e., the effects of the partner’s characteristics on a person’s outcomes) effects were identified but only for patients’ well-being. Certain significant interactions were also found: patients’ timeline-cyclical representations were weakly associated with their anxiety and depression symptoms when spouses perceived diabetes as less unpredictable. Also, spouses’ perceptions of consequences were more strongly related to their anxiety when patients perceived diabetes as less burdensome.

Conclusions

Overall, the findings indicate a type of synergy between patient and spouse illness representations. They also emphasize the interdependence between diabetes patients and their partners, and the need to examine adaptation to illness within a dyadic-regulation framework as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aikens JE, Wagner LI. Diabetes mellitus and other endocrine disorders. In: Camic P, Knight S, editors. Clinical handbook of health psychology. Cambridge: Hogrefe & Huber; 2004. p. 117–38.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Woodcock A, Bradley C. Diabetes mellitus. In: Ayers S, Baum A, McManus C, Newman S, Wallston K, Weinman J, West R, editors. Cambridge handbook of psychology, health and medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. p. 670–3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vijan S. Type 2 diabetes. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:ITC31–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fritschi C, Quinn L. Fatigue in patients with diabetes: a review. J Psychosom Res. 2010;69:33–41.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Renn BN, Feliciano L, Segal DL. The bidirectional relationship of depression and diabetes: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011;31:1239–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Roy T, Lloyd CE. Epidemiology of depression and diabetes: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2012;142S1:S8–S21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fisher L, Skaff MM, Mullan TJ, Arean P, Glasgow R, Masharani U. A longitudinal study of affective and anxiety disorders, depressive affect and diabetes distress in adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetic Med. 2008;25:1096–101.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Li C, Barker L, Ford ES, Zhang X, Strine TW, Mokdad AH. Diabetes and anxiety in US adults: findings from the 2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Diabetic Med. 2008;25:878–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lloyd CE, Roy T, Nouwen A, Chauhan AM. Epidemiology of depression in diabetes: international and cross-cultural issues. J Affect Disord. 2012;142S1:S22–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Katon WJ. The comorbidity of diabetes mellitus and depression. Am J Med. 2008;121:S8–S15.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. August KJ, Rook KS, Parris Stephens MA, Franks MM. Are spouses of chronically ill partners burdened by exerting health-related social control? J Health Psychol. 2011;16:1109–19.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fisher L, Chesla CA, Skaff MM, Mullan JT, Kanter RA. Depression and anxiety among partners of European-American and Latino patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:1564–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Franks MM, Lucas T, Stephens MAP, Rook KS, Gonzalez R. Diabetes distress and depressive symptoms: a dyadic investigation of older patients and their spouses. Fam Relat. 2010;59:599–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hunt KJ, Heiss G, Sholinsky PD, Province MA. Familial history of metabolic disorders and the multiple metabolic syndrome: the NHLBI family heart study. Genet Epidemiol. 2000;19:395–409.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Khan A, Lasker SS, Chowdhury TA. Are spouses of patients with type 2 diabetes at increased risk of developing diabetes? Diabetes Care. 2003;26:710–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Searle A, Norman P, Thompson R, Vedhara K. Illness representations among patients with type 2 diabetes and their partners: relationships with self-management behaviors. J Psychosom Res. 2007;63:175–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bodenmann G. Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In: Revenson TA, Kayser K, Bodenmann G, editors. Couples coping with stress: emerging perspectives on dyadic coping. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2005. p. 33–50.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Badr H, Carmack CL, Kashy DA, Cristofanilli M, Revenson TA. Dyadic coping in metastatic breast cancer. Health Psychol. 2010;29:169–80.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Berg CA, Upchurch R. A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span. Psychol Bull. 2007;133:920–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Coyne JC, Smith DAF. Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: a contextual perspective on wives’ distress. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991;61:404–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Coyne JC, Smith DAF. Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: contextual perspective on patient self-efficacy. J Fam Psychol. 1994;8:43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Leventhal H, Meyer D, Nerenz D. The Common-Sense Representations Of Illness Danger. In: Rachman S, editor. Medical psychology, vol. 2. New York: Pergamon; 1980. p. 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Leventhal H, Diefenbach M, Leventhal EA. Illness cognition: using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition treatment. Cogn Ther Res. 1992;16:223–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Heijmans M, de Ridder D, Bensing J. Dissimilarity in patients’ and spouses’ representations of chronic illness: explorations of relations to patient adaptation. Psychol Health. 1999;14:451–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Benyamini Y, Medalion B, Garfinkel D. Patient and spouse perceptions of the patient’s heart disease and their associations with received and provided social support and undermining. Psychol Health. 2007;22:765–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Figueiras MJ, Weinman J. Do similar patient and spouse perceptions of myocardial infarction predict recovery? Psychol Health. 2003;18:201–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sterba KR, DeVellis RF, Lewis MA, DeVellis B, Jordan JM, Baucom DH. Effect of couple illness perception congruence on psychological adjustment in women with rheumatoid arthritis. Health Psychol. 2008;27:221–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Moss-Morris R, Weinman J, Petrie KJ, Horne R, Cameron LD. The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R). Psychol Health. 2002;17:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hemphill RC, Parris Stephens MA, Rook KS, Franks MM, Salem JK. Older adults’ beliefs about the timeline of type 2 diabetes and adherence to dietary regimens. Psychol Health. 2012. doi:10.1080/08870446.2012.685740.

  30. Hampson SE, Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ. Personal models of diabetes and their relations to self-care activities. Health Psychol. 1990;9:632–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Paddison CAM, Alpass FM, Stephens CV. Psychological factors account for variation in metabolic control and perceived quality of life among people with type 2 diabetes in New Zealand. Int J Behav Med. 2008;15:180–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Searle A, Norman P, Thompson R, Vedhara K. A prospective examination of illness beliefs and coping in patients with type 2 diabetes. Br J Health Psychol. 2007;12:621–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hagger MS, Orbell S. A meta-analytic review of the Common-Sense Model of Illness Representations. Psychol Health. 2003;18:141–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Martin R, Leventhal H. Symptom perception and health care-seeking behavior. In: Boll TJ, Raczynski JM, Leviton LC, editors. Handbook of clinical health psychology, vol. 2. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2004. p. 299–328.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Paschalides C, Wearden AJ, Dunkerley R, Bundy C, Davies R, Dickens CM. The associations of anxiety, depression and personal illness representations with glycaemic control and health-related quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Psychosom Res. 2004;57:557–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Watkins KW, Connell CM, Fitzgerald JT, Klem L, Hickey T, Ingersoll-Dayton B. Effect of adults’ self-regulation of diabetes on quality-of-life outcomes. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:1511–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hampson SE, Glasgow RE, Foster LS. Personal models of diabetes among older adults: relationship to self-management and other variables. Diabetes Educ. 1995;21:300–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Leventhal H, Benyamini Y, Brownlee S, Diefenbach M, Leventhal EA, Patrick-Miller L, et al. Illness representations: theoretical foundations. In: Weinman J, Petrie K, editors. Perceptions of health and illness. London: Harwood Publishers; 1997. p. 19–45.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mann DM, Ponieman D, Leventhal H, Halm EA. Predictors of adherence to diabetes medications: the role of disease and medication beliefs. J Behav Med. 2009;32:278–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Weinberger M, Kirkman S, Samsa GP, Cowper PA, Shortliffe EA, Simel DL, et al. The relation between glycemic control and health-related quality of life in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Med Care. 1994;32:1173–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Stewart AL, Ware JE, editors. Measuring functioning and well-being: the Medical Outcome Study approach. Durham: Duke University Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ware Jr JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (validity and reliability). Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Mystakidou K, Tsilika E, Parpa E, Katsouda E, Galanos A, Vlahos L. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in Greek cancer patients: psychometric analyses and applicability. Support Care Cancer. 2004;12:821–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL. Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Joreskog KG, Sorbom D. LISREL 8 user’s guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Cook WL, Kenny DA. The Actor–Partner Interdependence Model: a model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. Int J Behav Dev. 2005;29:101–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Whitford DL, McGee H, O’Sullivan B. Will people with type 2 diabetes speak to family members about health risk? Diabetes Care. 2009;32:251–3.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Williams PG, Wasserman MS, Lotto AJ. Individual differences in self-assessed health: an information-processing investigation of health and illness cognition. Health Psychol. 2003;22:3–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Martire LM, Lustig AP, Schulz R, Miller GE, Helgeson VS. Is it beneficial to involve a family member? A meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for chronic illness. Health Psychol. 2004;23:599–611.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evangelos C. Karademas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dimitraki, G., Karademas, E.C. The Association of Type 2 Diabetes Patient and Spouse Illness Representations with Their Well-being: A Dyadic Approach. Int.J. Behav. Med. 21, 230–239 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-013-9296-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-013-9296-z

Keywords

Navigation